Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Drop IPC from display 13 and newer

2022-05-05 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 13:45 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 04 May 2022, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > This feature is supported from display 9 to display 12 and was > > incorrectly being applied to DG2 and Alderlake-P. > > > > While at is also taking the oportunity to drop it from > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/pvc: read fuses for link copy engines

2022-05-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 09:34 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > From: Lucas De Marchi > > The new Link Copy engines in PVC may be fused off according to the > mslice_mask. Each bit of the MEML3_EN_MASK we read from the > GEN10_MIRROR_FUSE3 register disables a pair of link copy engines. Reviewed-by: José

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/pvc: Reduce stack usage in reset selftest with extra blitter engine

2022-05-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 09:34 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > From: John Harrison > > PVC adds extra blitter engines (in the following patch). The reset > selftest has a local array on the stack which is sized by the number > of engines. The increase pushes the size of this array to the point > where

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/pvc: Engines definitions for new copy engines

2022-05-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 09:34 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > This patch adds the basic definitions needed to support > new copy engines. Also updating the cmd_info to accommodate > new engines, as the engine id's of legacy engines have been > changed. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/pvc: Reset support for new copy engines

2022-05-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 09:34 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > This patch adds the reset support for new copy engines > in PVC. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Bspec: 52549 > Original-author: CQ Tang > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 8 + >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/pvc: skip all copy engines from aux table invalidate

2022-05-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 09:34 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > From: Lucas De Marchi > > As we have more copy engines now, mask all of them from aux table > invalidate. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Cc: Prathap Kumar Valsan > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/display: Do not schedule DRRS work thread when it is not active

2022-04-29 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 19:00 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:10:56PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Frontbuffer updates were scheduling the execution of DRRS work thread > > even if DRRS is not active. > > There was no issues with it because

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add infrastructure to allow seamless mode switches

2022-04-26 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 21:08 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:22:03PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Intel hardware supports change between modes with different refresh > > rates without any glitches or visual artifacts, that feature is called > > seamless DRRS. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/display: Replace crtc_state's has_drrs by drrs_downclock_mode

2022-04-26 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 14:55 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2022, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Will be adding some additional control options to DRRS that will > > require to have the DRRS downclock mode stored in the crtc_state. > > > > So to optimize memory usage a bit here

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix SEL_FETCH_PLANE_*(PIPE_B+) register addresses

2022-04-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 19:22 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > Fix typo in the _SEL_FETCH_PLANE_BASE_1_B register base address. > Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > Fixes: a5523e2ff074a5 ("drm/i915: Add PSR2 selective fetch registers") > References:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/drrs: Split the DRRS status per connector

2022-04-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 15:17 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 01:52:20PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Instead of keep the DRRS status of all connectors/pipe into a single > > i915_drrs_status what makes user-space parsing terrible moving > > each eDP connector status

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Add workaround 22014263786 (rev3)

2022-04-20 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 15:49 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Add workaround 22014263786 (rev3) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102835/ State: success Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Add workaround 22014263786 (rev2)

2022-04-19 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 20:25 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/display: Add workaround 22014263786 (rev2) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102835/ State: failure Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix DISP_POS_Y and DISP_HEIGHT defines

2022-04-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 17:09 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Commit 428cb15d5b00 ("drm/i915: Clean up pre-skl primary plane registers") > introduced DISP_POS_Y and DISP_HEIGHT defines but accidentally set these > their masks to REG_GENMASK(31, 0) instead of REG_GENMASK(31, 16). > > This breaks the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl-n: Differentiate ADLP and ADLN steppings

2022-04-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 16:28 +0530, Tejas Upadhyay wrote: > ADL-N and ADL-P stepping are different, thus we > need to add check for ADL-N in IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(). > > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Do not check for PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE on alderlake-P

2022-04-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 11:13 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 09:43 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Alderlake-P don't have PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE bit, instead it have > > ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE in the same bit but > > this > > bit is clearead

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Clear more PSR state during disable

2022-04-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 11:08 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 15:59 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 07:27 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > > > Hello Jose, > > > > > > See my comment below. > > > > > > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Clear more PSR state during disable

2022-04-13 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 07:27 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > Hello Jose, > > See my comment below. > > On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 13:55 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > After commit 805f04d42a6b ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full > > frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") was

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/display: Fix warnings about PSR lock not held (rev3)

2022-04-07 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-04-07 at 21:01 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/display: Fix warnings about PSR lock not held (rev3) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102298/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22818/index.html CI

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915/display/psr: Set partial frame enable when forcing full frame fetch

2022-04-06 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 21:50 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: series starting with [CI,1/3] drm/i915/display/psr: Set partial frame enable when forcing full frame fetch URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/102209/ State: failure Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/display/psr: Lock and unlock PSR around pipe updates

2022-04-04 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 07:41 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > Hello, > > Couple of questions below. > On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 15:29 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other > > and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,v3,1/3] drm/i915/display/tgl+: Set default values for all registers in PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL

2022-03-30 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 19:29 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: series starting with [CI,v3,1/3] drm/i915/display/tgl+: Set default values for all registers in PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101965/ State: failure Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [CIv2,1/4] drm/i915/display/tgl+: Set default values for all registers in PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL

2022-03-30 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 15:54 +, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [CIv2,1/4] drm/i915/display/tgl+: Set default > values for all registers in PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101963/ > State : failure > > == Summary

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915/display: Program PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL with adl-p values

2022-03-29 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 21:14 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:16:15PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > From: Caz Yokoyama > > > > B credits set by IFWI do not match with specification default, so here > > programming the right value. > > > > Also while at it,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-29 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 16:10 +0300, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:36:10PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 09:49 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for docs: gpu: i915.rst: Fix DRRS documentation (rev2)

2022-03-29 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 00:00 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: docs: gpu: i915.rst: Fix DRRS documentation (rev2) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/101806/ State: success Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22699/index.html CI Bug Log -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations

2022-03-25 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 14:21 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > Hello Jose, > > See my comments below. > > On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 11:13 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can > > enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/display/adlp: Fix programing of PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL

2022-03-24 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 13:30 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:46:15PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL was only being programmed when a pipe is being > > enabled but that could potentially cause issues as it could have > > mismatching values while

Re: [Intel-gfx] [External] Re: drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-23 Thread Souza, Jose
Hi Mark See comment below. On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 10:23 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > Thanks Stanislav, > > On 3/22/22 10:18, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:55:35AM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 3/21/22 06:49, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/display: Remove MBUS joining invalid TODOs

2022-03-22 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 14:58 -0700, Caz Yokoyama wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:45 PM José Roberto de Souza > wrote: > > skl_compute_ddb() will for a modeset in all pipes when MBUS joining > > changes between states, so all pipes will be disabled, have all > > MBUS related registers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/display/adlp: Fix programing of PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL

2022-03-22 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 23:28 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:55:22PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL was only being programmed when a pipe is being > > enabled leaving other pipes with a wrong A_CREDIT value in cases > > like when going from one

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-22 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 09:49 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 07:01:27PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 12:49 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > > > when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-22 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 15:30 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:16:41PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 09:48 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-22 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 09:48 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 12:49 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > > > when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: s/enable/active/ for DRRS

2022-03-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 22:23 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 06:54:21PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Rename the DRRS functiosn to say &quo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 12:49 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround > or patches, which can fix that issue(were expecting some recent > selective fetch update and DBuf bw/SAGV fixes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 12:49 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround > or patches, which can fix that issue(were expecting some recent > selective fetch update and DBuf bw/SAGV fixes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 16:22 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 02:27:53PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 05:22 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 10:52 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 16:19 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 10:52 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > > > when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 05:22 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 10:52 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > > when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround > > or patches, which can fix that issue(were

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adl_p: Increase CDCLK by 15% if PSR2 is used

2022-03-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 10:52 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > We are currently getting FIFO underruns, in particular > when PSR2 is enabled. There seem to be no existing workaround > or patches, which can fix that issue(were expecting some recent > selective fetch update and DBuf bw/SAGV fixes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Add logical mapping for video decode engines

2022-03-17 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 16:45 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > From: Matthew Brost > > Add logical mapping for VDBOXs. This mapping is required for > split-frame workloads, which otherwise fail with > > -F8C53528: [GUC] 0441-INVALID_ENGINE_SUBMIT_MASK > > ... if the application is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Fix renamed struct field

2022-03-17 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 16:45 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Earlier versions of commit a5b7ef27da60 ("drm/i915: Add struct to hold > IP version") named "ver" as "arch" and then when it was renamed it > missed the rename on MEDIA_VER_FULL() since it it's currently not used. Reviewed-by: José

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: s/enable/active/ for DRRS

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Rename the DRRS functiosn to say "(de)activate" rather than > "enable/disable". This let's us differentiate between the > logically enabled vs. actually currently active cases. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Do DRRS disable/enable during pre/post_plane_update()

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Let's just do a full DRRS disable/enable across all pipe updates. > This guarantees that the DRRS work doesn't interfere with anything > while the atomic commit is busy reprogramming the pipe. > > Needed so that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Put the downclock_mode check back into can_enable_drrs()

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > With static DRRS the user might ask for the lowest possible refresh > rate of the panel, in which case we're not going to find a suitable > downclock mode for it and we should not try to enable seamless DRRS. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Schedule DRRS work from intel_drrs_enable()

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Schedule the DRRS downclock work already from intel_drrs_enable() > instead of waiting around for a frontbuffer flush that may or > may not ever come. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Don't cancel/schedule drrs work if the pipe wasn't affected

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Skip all the DRRS work cancel/schedule stuff if the pipe's > frontbuffer bits were not among those affected by the frontbuffer > rendering. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i195: Determine DRRS frontbuffer_bits ahead of time

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Pre-determine the frontbuffer_bits for the each pipe during > intel_drrs_enable(). Will become useful for bigjoiner use cases > soon. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Fix DRRS frontbuffer_bits handling

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Now that DRRS can operate on multiple pipes we need to make sure > one pipe doesn't throw away the other pipe's frontbuffer_bits before > said pipe can handle them. > Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Add missing tab to DRRS debugfs

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 15:27 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The DRRS refresh rate should be indented by one tab like the > other per-crtc DRRS stuff. > Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Report steering details in debugfs

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 16:42 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > Add a new 'steering' node in each gt's debugfs directory that tells > whether we're using explicit steering for various types of MCR ranges > and, if so, what MMIO ranges it applies to. > > We're going to be transitioning away from implicit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reduce stack usage in debugfs due to SSEU

2022-03-15 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 19:08 -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > From: John Harrison > > sseu_dev_info is already a pretty large structure which will likely > continue to grow when future platforms increase potential DSS and EU > counts. Let's switch the stack placement of this structure in debugfs >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display: Fix HPD short pulse handling for eDP

2022-03-11 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 23:52 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:05:17PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Commit 13ea6db2cf24 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel > > powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is > > usually generated by

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Stash DRRS state under intel_crtc

2022-03-10 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 02:47 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Get rid of the ugly intel_dp dependency, and one more crtc->config > usage by storing the DRRS state under intel_crtc. intel_drrs_enable() > copies what it needs from the crtc state, after which DRRS can be >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Do not re-enable PSR after it was marked as not reliable

2022-03-09 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 13:51 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > Hello Jose, > > See my question/comment below. > > On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 07:41 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be > > disabled > > for good but that is not happening. >

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/psr: Set "SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update (rev5)

2022-03-03 Thread Souza, Jose
On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 05:27 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/psr: Set "SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update (rev5) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100633/ State: success Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Use unions per platform in intel_dpll_hw_state

2022-02-24 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 17:39 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:49:36PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:25 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:17:35PM +, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Allow users to disable PSR2

2022-02-24 Thread Souza, Jose
+ Rodrigo On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:11 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:06:30PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:01:24PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:12 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Use unions per platform in intel_dpll_hw_state

2022-02-24 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 15:25 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 01:17:35PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:20 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:55:51PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/display: Use unions per platform in intel_dpll_hw_state

2022-02-24 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:20 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:55:51PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > + union { > > + /* icl+ TC */ > > + struct { > > + u32 mg_refclkin_ctl; > > + u32

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Allow users to disable PSR2

2022-02-24 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-24 at 12:12 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:41:03AM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or > > issues that were root caused to panel firmware, to make life of those > > users easier here

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Use unions per platform in intel_dpll_hw_state

2022-02-23 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 21:58 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 06:20:45AM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h > > index ba2fdfce15792..4360e1c9266d8 100644 > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/rps/tgl+: Remove RPS interrupt support

2022-02-23 Thread Souza, Jose
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 17:35 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/rps/tgl+: Remove RPS interrupt support URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100426/ State: success Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22336/index.html CI Bug Log -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/psr: Set "SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update

2022-02-23 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 14:48 +0200, Jouni Högander wrote: > Currently we are observing occasional screen flickering when > PSR2 selective fetch is enabled. More specifically glitch seems > to happen on full frame update when cursor moves to coords > x = -1 or y = -1. > > According to Bspec SF

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/tgl: Simply subplatform detection (rev2)

2022-02-23 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 11:03 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/tgl: Simply subplatform detection (rev2) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/100517/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22354/index.html CI Bug Log -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/adlp: Add TypeC PHY TBT->DP-alt/legacy mode switch workaround

2022-02-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 14:31 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > Add display workaround # 1309179469 , which fixes a PHY hang when > switching from TBT mode to DP-alt/legacy mode. The workaround also > requires an IFWI/PHY firmware change, before that this change has no > effect (the DKL_PCS_DW5/SOFTRESET

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/dg2: Do not use phy E

2022-02-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 01:54 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > PORT_TC1 is still not being initialized - that is the port that uses phy > E. However the intel_phy_is_snps() reports that phy as being present, > which causes warnings about unclaimed access to the PHY_MISC register. > Even with some

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Group PSR2 prog sequences and workarounds

2022-02-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 00:04 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display: Group PSR2 prog sequences and workarounds URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99989/ State: success Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display/tgl+: Implement new PLL programming step (rev3)

2022-02-17 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 13:32 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/display/tgl+: Implement new PLL programming step (rev3) URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/99867/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_22296/index.html CI

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disconnect PHYs left connected by BIOS on disabled ports

2022-02-17 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 17:22 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > BIOS may leave a TypeC PHY in a connected state even though the > corresponding port is disabled. This will prevent any hotplug events > from being signalled (after the monitor deasserts and then reasserts its > HPD) until the PHY is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_16013835468

2022-02-16 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:31 +, Hogander, Jouni wrote: > On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 10:52 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > PSR2 workaround required when mode has delayed vblank. > > > > BSpec: 52890 > > BSpec: 49421 > > Cc: Jouni Högander > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza > > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_16013835468

2022-02-16 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 15:47 +0200, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:52:23AM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > PSR2 workaround required when mode has delayed vblank. > > > > BSpec: 52890 > > BSpec: 49421 > > Cc: Jouni Högander > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Disable PSR2 selective fetch for all TGL steps

2022-02-08 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 16:38 -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > As we've unfortunately started to come to expect from PSR on Intel > platforms, PSR2 selective fetch is not at all ready to be enabled on > Tigerlake as it results in severe flickering issues - at least on this > ThinkPad X1 Carbon 9th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/i915: Do not spam log with missing arch support

2022-02-01 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Following what was done in drm_cache.c, when the stub for > remap_io_mapping() was added in commit 67c430bbaae1 ("drm/i915: Skip > remap_io_mapping() for non-x86 platforms"), it included a log message > with pr_err(). However just the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm: Stop spamming log with drm_cache message

2022-02-01 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Only x86 and in some cases PPC have support added in drm_cache.c for the > clflush class of functions. However warning once is sufficient to taint > the log instead of spamming it with "Architecture has no drm_cache.c > support" every few

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915: Fix header test for !CONFIG_X86

2022-02-01 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 08:59 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Architectures others than x86 have a stub implementation calling > WARN_ON_ONCE(). The appropriate headers need to be included, otherwise > the header-test target will fail with: > > HDRTEST drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mm.h > In file

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/adlp: Fix TypeC PHY-ready status readout

2022-01-26 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 12:43 +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > The TCSS_DDI_STATUS register is indexed by tc_port not by the FIA port > index, fix this up. This only caused an issue on TC#3/4 ports in legacy > mode, as in all other cases the two indices either match (on TC#1/2) or > the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Clean up pre-skl primary plane registers

2022-01-21 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 13:30 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. for the pre-skl primary plane registers. > Also give everything a consistent namespace. > > v2: s/DSP/DISP/ to avoid confusion (José) > Use DISP_WIDTH rather than DISP_POS_X for DSPSIZE

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Clean up pre-skl primary plane registers

2022-01-18 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 02:55 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:12:31PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > @@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static void i9xx_plane_update_noarm(struct > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Clean up cursor registers

2022-01-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. to polish the cursor plane registers. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cursor.c | 25 --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915: Clean up g4x+ sprite plane registers

2022-01-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. to polish the g4x+ sprite plane registers. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 12 ++-- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915: Clean up vlv/chv sprite plane registers

2022-01-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. to polish the vlv/chv sprite plane registers. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 9 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915: Clean up ivb+ sprite plane registers

2022-01-14 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. to polish the ivb+ sprite plane registers. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.c | 20 +++-- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/display/adlp: Implement new step in the TC voltage swing prog sequence

2022-01-13 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 19:59 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/display/adlp: Implement new step in the TC voltage swing prog sequence URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98853/ State: success Details:

Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/display/ehl: Update voltage swing table

2022-01-13 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 17:56 +, Patchwork wrote: Patch Details Series: drm/i915/display/ehl: Update voltage swing table URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98844/ State: failure Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21994/index.html CI Bug Log -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915: Clean up pre-skl primary plane registers

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Use REG_BIT() & co. for the pre-skl primary plane registers. > Also give everything a consistent namespace. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c| 99

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for universal plane bits

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 13:57 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:26:50PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Polish the skl+ universal plane register d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Sipmplify PLANE_STRIDE masking

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > There's no need to have separate masks for the stride bitfield > in PLANE_STRIDE for different platforms. All the extra bits > are hardcoded to zero anyway. > > Also the masks we're using now don't even match the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use new has_psr2_sel_fetch flag

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 16:00 +0200, Jouni Högander wrote: > Now as we have has_psr2_sel_fetch flag we can rely that > instead of checking each platform separately. > > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 7 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: remove unused lines_to_wait vbt info

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:27 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > The lines_to_wait info from VBT is never used. Remove. > Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > Cc: José Roberto de Souza > Cc: Jouni Högander > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > > --- > > Not exactly a v2, but rather a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TGL-U][iGFX] Monitoring the freq of iGFX with kernel 5.10 on TGL-U i5-1145GRE

2022-01-12 Thread Souza, Jose
-Original Message- From: Souza, Jose mailto:jose.so...@intel.com>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 8:14 PM To: Schweikhardt, Markus mailto:markus.schweikha...@intel.com>>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [Intel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/snps: vswing value refined for SNPS phys

2022-01-11 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 15:45 -0800, clinton.a.tay...@intel.com wrote: > From: Clint Taylor > > Updated new values from BSPEC. > > BSPEC: 53920 > Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: José Roberto de Souza > Cc: Imre Deak > Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor > --- >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [TGL-U][iGFX] Monitoring the freq of iGFX with kernel 5.10 on TGL-U i5-1145GRE

2022-01-10 Thread Souza, Jose
On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 18:56 +, Schweikhardt, Markus wrote: > Hi all, >   > I would like to monitor the frequency of the iGPU of my TGL platform while > running glmark2 in bursts which means glmark2 is 5secrunning and 5sec not > running.I disabled RC6 by echo 0 >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/5] drm/i915/panelreplay: Initializaton and compute config for panel replay

2022-01-04 Thread Souza, Jose
On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 21:21 +0530, Manna, Animesh wrote: > Hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Souza, Jose > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 1:19 AM > > To: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Manna, Animesh > > ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.o

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Get rid of the "sizes are 0 based" stuff

2021-12-03 Thread Souza, Jose
On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 13:56 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:18:54PM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 17:25 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Replace the "sizes are 0 based&qu

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ddi: add use_edp_hobl() and use_edp_low_vswing() helpers

2021-12-03 Thread Souza, Jose
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 15:13 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Localize HOBL and low vswing VBT lookups to a couple of small helpers, > and get rid of a bunch of local variables. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > --- > .../drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: replace X86_FEATURE_PAT with pat_enabled()

2021-12-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 16:30 -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > PAT can be disabled on boot with "nopat" in the command line. Replace > one x86-ism with another, which is slightly more correct to prepare for > supporting other architectures. Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Cc: Matt Roper >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 2/3] drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCH Support for Raptor Lake S

2021-12-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 02:33 -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Add the PCH ID for RPL-S. > > v2: Self contained commit message (Jani) Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza > > Cc: Jani Nikula > Cc: Swathi Dhanavanthri > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pch.c | 1

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3 1/3] drm/i915/rpl-s: Add PCI IDS for Raptor Lake S

2021-12-02 Thread Souza, Jose
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 02:33 -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote: > Raptor Lake S(RPL-S) is a version 12 > Display, Media and Render. For all i915 > purposes it is the same as Alder Lake S (ADL-S). > > Introduce RPL-S as a subplatform > of ADL-S. This patch adds PCI ids for RPL-S. > > v2: Update PCI

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >