Multiple misunderstandings of the expectations of the test and some
missed parts of the shell-to-c conversion caused a couple of issues to
remain.

First, we need to actually disable a subbank before we check that a
subbank is disabled (invoke the tool with -d).

Second, the original pipe to wc -l was to check that the tool prints
only one line, not that it prints "at least" a line. Modify the last
check to verify that an "is disabled" text is _not_ printed.

v2: Add a TODO comment

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101650
Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janul...@linux.intel.com>
---
 tests/tools_test.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/tools_test.c b/tests/tools_test.c
index 132bb88b..6aea7a8a 100644
--- a/tests/tools_test.c
+++ b/tests/tools_test.c
@@ -28,26 +28,31 @@
 #include <fcntl.h>
 
 struct line_check {
-       bool found;
+       int found;
        const char *substr;
 };
 
 /**
  * Our igt_log_buffer_inspect handler. Checks the output of the
- * intel_l3_parity tool and returns line_check::found to true if
- * a specific substring is found.
+ * intel_l3_parity tool and increments line_check::found if a specific
+ * substring is found.
  */
-static bool check_cmd_return_value(const char *line, void *data)
+static bool check_cmd_output(const char *line, void *data)
 {
        struct line_check *check = data;
 
-       if (!strstr(line, check->substr)) {
-               check->found = false;
-               return false;
+       if (strstr(line, check->substr)) {
+               check->found++;
        }
 
-       check->found = true;
-       return true;
+       return false;
+}
+
+static void assert_cmd_success(int exec_return)
+{
+       igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
+                     "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
+       igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
 }
 
 igt_main
@@ -56,46 +61,54 @@ igt_main
 
        igt_subtest("sysfs_l3_parity") {
                int exec_return;
+               struct line_check line;
 
+               /* Sanity check that l3 parity tool is usable: Enable
+                * row,bank,subbank 0,0,0.
+                *
+                * TODO: Better way to find intel_l3_parity. This path
+                * is relative to piglit's path, when run through
+                * piglit.
+                */
                igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
                               "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 "
                               "-s 0 -e");
-               igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
-                             "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
-               igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
+               assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
 
+               /* Disable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0. */
+               igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 
"
+                              "-s 0 -d");
+               assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
+
+               /* Check that disabling was successful */
                igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
-               if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) {
-                       struct line_check line;
-                       line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
-                       igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value,
-                                              &line);
-                       igt_assert_eq(line.found, true);
-               }
+               assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
+               line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
+               line.found = 0;
+               igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output,
+                                      &line);
+               igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1);
 
+               /* Re-enable row,bank,subbank 0,0,0 */
                igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
                               "../tools/intel_l3_parity -r 0 -b 0 "
                               "-s 0 -e");
-               igt_skip_on_f(exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SKIP,
-                             "intel_l3_parity not supported\n");
-               igt_assert_eq(exec_return, IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS);
+               assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
 
-               /* Check that we can clear remaps:
-                * In the original shell script, the output of intel_l3_parity 
-l
-                * was piped thru wc -l to check if the tool would at least
-                * return a line. Just watch for one of the expected output
-                * string as an alternative.
-                * ("is disabled" unique only to intel_l3_parity.c:dumpit())
+               /* Check that re-enabling was successful:
+                * intel_l3_parity -l should now not print that Row 0,
+                * Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled.
+                *
+                * The previously printed line is already in the log
+                * buffer so we check for count 1.
                 */
-               igt_system_cmd(exec_return,
-                              "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
-               if (exec_return == IGT_EXIT_SUCCESS) {
-                       struct line_check line;
-                       line.substr = "is disabled";
-                       igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_return_value,
-                                              &line);
-                       igt_assert_eq(line.found, true);
-               }
+               igt_system_cmd(exec_return, "../tools/intel_l3_parity -l");
+               assert_cmd_success(exec_return);
+               line.substr = "Row 0, Bank 0, Subbank 0 is disabled";
+               line.found = 0;
+               igt_log_buffer_inspect(check_cmd_output,
+                                      &line);
+               igt_assert_eq(line.found, 1);
        }
 
        igt_subtest("tools_test") {
-- 
2.14.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to