Reloading the module may impact subsequent tests by destabilising the
system. As we do for BAT, if we want to test reloads, it should be
handled explicitly at the end of the run, rather than placed at random
in the middle of the test list.

v2: Commentary

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106539
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarv...@intel.com>
---
 tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
index 7700a60b7..c93554a37 100644
--- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
+++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
@@ -5,6 +5,15 @@ igt@meta_test(@.*)?
 igt@drv_selftest(@.*)?
 igt@drm_mm(@.*)?
 ###############################################
+# Handle module reloads with great care!
+#
+# Reloading a module is more likely to leave
+# the machine in an unexpected state than other
+# self-contained tests, leading to random
+# failures in tests run afterwards.
+###############################################
+igt@drv_module_reload(@.*)?
+###############################################
 # GEM
 ###############################################
 igt@gem_busy@(?!.*basic).*hang.*
-- 
2.18.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to