Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-06 Thread Douglas L. Konzen

Hi John

Norman sold his motors to Al Franceour in Canada, once the family of Edwin 
Gray started to hassle him. ALF has rewound and rebuilt the motors a bit, 
but as far as I know he has not got them running at high voltage with the 
GRAY tube.
Look in files section of EVGRAY yahoo groups, and there a lots of pictures 
of those motors taken apart as ALF was redoing them.
Norman also has done without-a-doubt overunity tests of Hector Pere's AC 
motor conversion the "rotovertor" where you take a 5000W AC 3ph AC motor, 
and make it run on 20 or so watts at idle (I have done it too - its easy) 
and Norman spun a DC servo motor with the "RV"  (DC motor is PMI brand - low 
lenz design) and got it to put out way more WATTS than being inputted to it,
Norman has also made very-overunity tests and prototypes of the "MRA" 
(magnetic resonant amplifier) which was confirmed by lots of scientists too 
about 8 years ago.

ciaoK





From: "John W. Williams II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: interact@listserv.capital-master.com
To: "Interact" 
Subject: Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:51:49 -0700


Hi all,

I purchased the 2001 TeslaTech video of Norman Wootan talking about  the 
history of the EV Gray motors.  I was wondering if anyone on this  list 
(like Jerry Decker) might know what ever happened to Mr.  Wootan's project?


I created a wiki entry for him over at PESWiki.com.  Just curious  what 
fate befell his project to set up a machine shop and tinker with  those 
motors, as we're now in 2006 and have never heard a word more  from him?


I'm just getting into the Free Energy field, and happy to see all the  
great web resources people have put up to share info.


On Sep 1, 2006, at 3:58 AM, Jerry Decker - KN wrote:


Hola Folks!

Looks like Dan got the list working right again...it wasn't sending  to 
the archive and then not even to the list, but all better  now...thanks 
Dan!


I suspect most everyone knows about the claims of this Irish group  
Steorn, that they have a rotating magnetic device which I believe  they 
estimate at 218% efficient?


In the keelynet.com news I had tracked the patent and included a  diagram 
with their description of how their shielding method worked.


There are NUMEROUS patents for shielding methods and one of the  most 
famous is Ecklin.


http://www.kz1300.com/ecklin/

And there is also Jack Hilden-Brands invention of a method of  switching 
off any natural magnetic field, either mechanically or  electronically 
with very little power.  He kindly send me both the  mechanical and 
electronic prototypes which I tested and was totally  amazed with.  He has 
gone MUCH FURTHER and has a motor he estimates  is 600% efficient and 
thats just an early prototype as he thinks  his new one will be far more 
efficient. See;


http://www.keelynet.com/energy/hildenbrand.htm

What is interesting...Jack showed his technology at a product fair,  has a 
patent app well before Steorn and has been working on his for  years now.  
So I wonder if Steorn saw or stumbled on his  information and made a crude 
model which they have run to patent.


Plus the comments on some websites about how they were essentially  an 
information company in an earlier incarnation and had converted  to a 
security products company, now put an advert in the Economist,  not Sci-AM 
or any physics or electronics media...as the Economist  is read by finance 
type people, not scientists.  Peculiar approach.


Plus the 10% of scientists who they claim have verified the claim  won't 
come forth with their names or to back it up.


This is one comment about it from a weblog;

"The more I think about this I am of two minds: 1. These guys  really do 
think they've succeeded in breaking the laws of  thermodynamics. 2. Recall 
that Steorn is a former e-business  company that saw its market vanish 
during the dot.com bust. It  stands to reason that Steorn has re-tooled as 
a Web marketing  company, and is using the "free energy" promotion as a 
platform to  show future clients how it can leverage print advertising and 
a  slick Web site to promote their products and ideas. If so, it's a  
pretty brilliant strategy."

-
I KNOW it is possible to redirect magnetic flux (you can't actually  
shield it, but you can cancel or redirect it) as I've seen it in  Jacks 
devices, so perhaps they do have something.


Jack has switched off the field of a magnet holding 400 pounds of  weight, 
but using only some 8 Watts of power...and in one  configuration, it was 
80 pounds of lift switched off with just .6  Watts...yes, you read that 
right600mW!!!


So you can imagine how a motor could be designed that was like the  EV 
Gray motor but using natural magnets being switched on and off  to produce 
rotation and torque.  And apply that to generators!!!

Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-05 Thread Dave Narby

Hey Konehead!  Glad to see you're still alive and kickin'!

Would you consider sharing what you know about getting the "Rotoverter" 
to work?  I've looked into it but what I uncovered was a morass.  It 
would be really nice to get the facts from someone with direct 
experience who is available for comment.


Best,

Dave Narby

Douglas L. Konzen wrote:

Hi John

Norman sold his motors to Al Franceour in Canada, once the family of 
Edwin Gray started to hassle him. ALF has rewound and rebuilt the 
motors a bit, but as far as I know he has not got them running at high 
voltage with the GRAY tube.
Look in files section of EVGRAY yahoo groups, and there a lots of 
pictures of those motors taken apart as ALF was redoing them.
Norman also has done without-a-doubt overunity tests of Hector Pere's 
AC motor conversion the "rotovertor" where you take a 5000W AC 3ph AC 
motor, and make it run on 20 or so watts at idle (I have done it too - 
its easy) and Norman spun a DC servo motor with the "RV"  (DC motor is 
PMI brand - low lenz design) and got it to put out way more WATTS than 
being inputted to it,
Norman has also made very-overunity tests and prototypes of the "MRA" 
(magnetic resonant amplifier) which was confirmed by lots of 
scientists too about 8 years ago.

ciaoK





From: "John W. Williams II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: interact@listserv.capital-master.com
To: "Interact" 
Subject: Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:51:49 -0700


Hi all,

I purchased the 2001 TeslaTech video of Norman Wootan talking about  
the history of the EV Gray motors.  I was wondering if anyone on 
this  list (like Jerry Decker) might know what ever happened to Mr.  
Wootan's project?


I created a wiki entry for him over at PESWiki.com.  Just curious  
what fate befell his project to set up a machine shop and tinker 
with  those motors, as we're now in 2006 and have never heard a word 
more  from him?


I'm just getting into the Free Energy field, and happy to see all 
the  great web resources people have put up to share info.


On Sep 1, 2006, at 3:58 AM, Jerry Decker - KN wrote:


Hola Folks!

Looks like Dan got the list working right again...it wasn't sending  
to the archive and then not even to the list, but all better  
now...thanks Dan!


I suspect most everyone knows about the claims of this Irish group  
Steorn, that they have a rotating magnetic device which I believe  
they estimate at 218% efficient?


In the keelynet.com news I had tracked the patent and included a  
diagram with their description of how their shielding method worked.


There are NUMEROUS patents for shielding methods and one of the  
most famous is Ecklin.


http://www.kz1300.com/ecklin/

And there is also Jack Hilden-Brands invention of a method of  
switching off any natural magnetic field, either mechanically or  
electronically with very little power.  He kindly send me both the  
mechanical and electronic prototypes which I tested and was totally  
amazed with.  He has gone MUCH FURTHER and has a motor he estimates  
is 600% efficient and thats just an early prototype as he thinks  
his new one will be far more efficient. See;


http://www.keelynet.com/energy/hildenbrand.htm

What is interesting...Jack showed his technology at a product fair,  
has a patent app well before Steorn and has been working on his for  
years now.  So I wonder if Steorn saw or stumbled on his  
information and made a crude model which they have run to patent.


Plus the comments on some websites about how they were essentially  
an information company in an earlier incarnation and had converted  
to a security products company, now put an advert in the Economist,  
not Sci-AM or any physics or electronics media...as the Economist  
is read by finance type people, not scientists.  Peculiar approach.


Plus the 10% of scientists who they claim have verified the claim  
won't come forth with their names or to back it up.


This is one comment about it from a weblog;

"The more I think about this I am of two minds: 1. These guys  
really do think they've succeeded in breaking the laws of  
thermodynamics. 2. Recall that Steorn is a former e-business  
company that saw its market vanish during the dot.com bust. It  
stands to reason that Steorn has re-tooled as a Web marketing  
company, and is using the "free energy" promotion as a platform to  
show future clients how it can leverage print advertising and a  
slick Web site to promote their products and ideas. If so, it's a  
pretty brilliant strategy."

-
I KNOW it is possible to redirect magnetic flux (you can't actually  
shield it, but you can cancel or redirect it) as I've seen it in  
Jacks devices, so perhaps they do have something.


Jack has switched off the field of a magnet holding 400 pound

Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-05 Thread Dave Narby

Pretty sure the CIK (Canuck In Question) is Al Francouer.

Jerry Decker - KN wrote:

Hola John et al!

Norman is still around, busy as always and living on his ranch in Waco.

As I understood it at the time, the people who actually owned the 2 EV 
Gray motors shown at the conference sold them to someone I think in 
Canada.  The problem I think was the power tube, but you'd have to ask 
Norm about all the details.


Perhaps he'll provide us with all the details and current status of 
the motors.


There appears to be a company in Australia who has a very similar 
technology which was reported in KeelyNet news last year I think.  I 
did a search and found the three brief article from the archived July 
2005 files;


07/30/05 - Another report on the Welsh engine

(Thanks for the URL Nick! - JWD) IMP has been working on the 
development and optimisation of a high torque, low speed silent 
electric motor which was launched to great acclaim in Hanover in April 
this year. IP Wales has given IMP help with taking out a patent for a 
new design of a 5-stage high torque electric motor. The motor has no 
brushes, making it ideal for use in the petrochemical industry and 
other sectors where sparks present a hazard - meaning it has a huge 
functional advantage over competitors products. The motor design 
offers several other important features, which include full torque 
from 0 rpm, and no gearbox is required. The motor also has 100 per 
cent speed control with the motor only taking power as and when 
required. IP Wales has given IMP help with taking out a patent for a 
new design of a 5-stage high torque electric motor. This will be 
extended to cover not only the UK but also mainland Europe, USA and 
Hong Kong.


07/29/05 - Revolutionary new Welsh Electric Motor

Imagine an electric car that produces hardly any noise, no air 
pollution, and is as fast as a Ferrari. As well as high performance 
vehicles, there are plans for a battery-powered family car with a 
range of hundreds of miles. The motor is revolutionary in that it 
contains no bulky permanent magnets. Instead it relies on transmitting 
electric pulses across up to seven rotors, arranged in different 
phases. These are "fired up" in turn, much like the pistons of an 
internal combustion engine. There are no gears - the motor provides 
enough torque at one revolution per minute to put a vehicle into 
motion - and it spins at up to 2,500rpm. "Size for size, we can 
provide 400% more torque than any type of motor currently available," 
says managing director John Bryant. At present, providing enough 
battery life is a problem. But battery technology is improving all the 
time, and Mr Bryant does not see it as a major obstacle.


07/29/05 - Is this Welsh motor the 'new' EV Gray motor?

The control unit, acting in a manner similar to that of a distributor 
in an internal combustion engine, regulates the spikes, determines 
their polarity (whether they be north or south) and directs their 
power to selected electro-magnets in the main unit.

While this occurs, the recycle/regeneration system is recharging the 
batteries with 60 to 120-amp pulses. The electro-magnets are located 
on both the rotor and stator of the large motor. Attraction and 
repulsion between the two sets of magnets causes the motor to operate 
and generate horsepower. Note: EV Gray used 3 phase, the Welsh motor 
is using 7 phase.


All the EV Gray information with many other related items has been 
compiled into George Moonhies eBook called "High Voltage and Free 
Energy Devices" which can be downloaded for $15 at;


http://www.vanguardsciences.biz

I think its a rather good book because it gives a lot of experimental 
details and insights for those working in this field.


There was a note at ZPEpower that Peter Lindemann is about to come out 
with his 2nd videotape, though I don't think they've been able to 
duplicate any of the work he first announced at the conference. 
Specifically a working power tube based on Teslas unidirectional 
current experiments.



John W. Williams II wrote:


Hi all,

I purchased the 2001 TeslaTech video of Norman Wootan talking about  
the history of the EV Gray motors.  I was wondering if anyone on 
this  list (like Jerry Decker) might know what ever happened to Mr.  
Wootan's project?


I created a wiki entry for him over at PESWiki.com.  Just curious  
what fate befell his project to set up a machine shop and tinker 
with  those motors, as we're now in 2006 and have never heard a word 
more  from him?


I'm just getting into the Free Energy field, and happy to see all 
the  great web resources people have put up to share info.






Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-05 Thread Jerry Decker - KN

Hola John et al!

Norman is still around, busy as always and living on his ranch in Waco.

As I understood it at the time, the people who actually owned the 2 EV 
Gray motors shown at the conference sold them to someone I think in 
Canada.  The problem I think was the power tube, but you'd have to ask 
Norm about all the details.


Perhaps he'll provide us with all the details and current status of the 
motors.


There appears to be a company in Australia who has a very similar 
technology which was reported in KeelyNet news last year I think.  I did 
a search and found the three brief article from the archived July 2005 
files;


07/30/05 - Another report on the Welsh engine

(Thanks for the URL Nick! - JWD) IMP has been working on the development 
and optimisation of a high torque, low speed silent electric motor which 
was launched to great acclaim in Hanover in April this year. IP Wales 
has given IMP help with taking out a patent for a new design of a 
5-stage high torque electric motor. The motor has no brushes, making it 
ideal for use in the petrochemical industry and other sectors where 
sparks present a hazard - meaning it has a huge functional advantage 
over competitors products. The motor design offers several other 
important features, which include full torque from 0 rpm, and no gearbox 
is required. The motor also has 100 per cent speed control with the 
motor only taking power as and when required. IP Wales has given IMP 
help with taking out a patent for a new design of a 5-stage high torque 
electric motor. This will be extended to cover not only the UK but also 
mainland Europe, USA and Hong Kong.


07/29/05 - Revolutionary new Welsh Electric Motor

Imagine an electric car that produces hardly any noise, no air 
pollution, and is as fast as a Ferrari. As well as high performance 
vehicles, there are plans for a battery-powered family car with a range 
of hundreds of miles. The motor is revolutionary in that it contains no 
bulky permanent magnets. Instead it relies on transmitting electric 
pulses across up to seven rotors, arranged in different phases. These 
are "fired up" in turn, much like the pistons of an internal combustion 
engine. There are no gears - the motor provides enough torque at one 
revolution per minute to put a vehicle into motion - and it spins at up 
to 2,500rpm. "Size for size, we can provide 400% more torque than any 
type of motor currently available," says managing director John Bryant. 
At present, providing enough battery life is a problem. But battery 
technology is improving all the time, and Mr Bryant does not see it as a 
major obstacle.


07/29/05 - Is this Welsh motor the 'new' EV Gray motor?

The control unit, acting in a manner similar to that of a distributor in 
an internal combustion engine, regulates the spikes, determines their 
polarity (whether they be north or south) and directs their power to 
selected electro-magnets in the main unit.


While this occurs, the recycle/regeneration system is recharging the 
batteries with 60 to 120-amp pulses. The electro-magnets are located on 
both the rotor and stator of the large motor. Attraction and repulsion 
between the two sets of magnets causes the motor to operate and generate 
horsepower. Note: EV Gray used 3 phase, the Welsh motor is using 7 phase.


All the EV Gray information with many other related items has been 
compiled into George Moonhies eBook called "High Voltage and Free Energy 
Devices" which can be downloaded for $15 at;


http://www.vanguardsciences.biz

I think its a rather good book because it gives a lot of experimental 
details and insights for those working in this field.


There was a note at ZPEpower that Peter Lindemann is about to come out 
with his 2nd videotape, though I don't think they've been able to 
duplicate any of the work he first announced at the conference. 
Specifically a working power tube based on Teslas unidirectional current 
experiments.



John W. Williams II wrote:


Hi all,

I purchased the 2001 TeslaTech video of Norman Wootan talking about  the 
history of the EV Gray motors.  I was wondering if anyone on this  list 
(like Jerry Decker) might know what ever happened to Mr.  Wootan's project?


I created a wiki entry for him over at PESWiki.com.  Just curious  what 
fate befell his project to set up a machine shop and tinker with  those 
motors, as we're now in 2006 and have never heard a word more  from him?


I'm just getting into the Free Energy field, and happy to see all the  
great web resources people have put up to share info.




--

from Jerry Decker @ http://www.keelynet.com
   Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
  Donations : http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
Books/Videos : http://www.keelynet.com/products.htm
  MexiStim Energy Stimulator
  http://www.keelynet.com/mexistim/nexcrock.htm

  Vanguard Sciences (eBooks and DVD

Re: [Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-05 Thread John W. Williams II


Hi all,

I purchased the 2001 TeslaTech video of Norman Wootan talking about  
the history of the EV Gray motors.  I was wondering if anyone on this  
list (like Jerry Decker) might know what ever happened to Mr.  
Wootan's project?


I created a wiki entry for him over at PESWiki.com.  Just curious  
what fate befell his project to set up a machine shop and tinker with  
those motors, as we're now in 2006 and have never heard a word more  
from him?


I'm just getting into the Free Energy field, and happy to see all the  
great web resources people have put up to share info.


On Sep 1, 2006, at 3:58 AM, Jerry Decker - KN wrote:


Hola Folks!

Looks like Dan got the list working right again...it wasn't sending  
to the archive and then not even to the list, but all better  
now...thanks Dan!


I suspect most everyone knows about the claims of this Irish group  
Steorn, that they have a rotating magnetic device which I believe  
they estimate at 218% efficient?


In the keelynet.com news I had tracked the patent and included a  
diagram with their description of how their shielding method worked.


There are NUMEROUS patents for shielding methods and one of the  
most famous is Ecklin.


http://www.kz1300.com/ecklin/

And there is also Jack Hilden-Brands invention of a method of  
switching off any natural magnetic field, either mechanically or  
electronically with very little power.  He kindly send me both the  
mechanical and electronic prototypes which I tested and was totally  
amazed with.  He has gone MUCH FURTHER and has a motor he estimates  
is 600% efficient and thats just an early prototype as he thinks  
his new one will be far more efficient. See;


http://www.keelynet.com/energy/hildenbrand.htm

What is interesting...Jack showed his technology at a product fair,  
has a patent app well before Steorn and has been working on his for  
years now.  So I wonder if Steorn saw or stumbled on his  
information and made a crude model which they have run to patent.


Plus the comments on some websites about how they were essentially  
an information company in an earlier incarnation and had converted  
to a security products company, now put an advert in the Economist,  
not Sci-AM or any physics or electronics media...as the Economist  
is read by finance type people, not scientists.  Peculiar approach.


Plus the 10% of scientists who they claim have verified the claim  
won't come forth with their names or to back it up.


This is one comment about it from a weblog;

"The more I think about this I am of two minds: 1. These guys  
really do think they've succeeded in breaking the laws of  
thermodynamics. 2. Recall that Steorn is a former e-business  
company that saw its market vanish during the dot.com bust. It  
stands to reason that Steorn has re-tooled as a Web marketing  
company, and is using the "free energy" promotion as a platform to  
show future clients how it can leverage print advertising and a  
slick Web site to promote their products and ideas. If so, it's a  
pretty brilliant strategy."

-
I KNOW it is possible to redirect magnetic flux (you can't actually  
shield it, but you can cancel or redirect it) as I've seen it in  
Jacks devices, so perhaps they do have something.


Jack has switched off the field of a magnet holding 400 pounds of  
weight, but using only some 8 Watts of power...and in one  
configuration, it was 80 pounds of lift switched off with just .6  
Watts...yes, you read that right600mW!!!


So you can imagine how a motor could be designed that was like the  
EV Gray motor but using natural magnets being switched on and off  
to produce rotation and torque.  And apply that to generators!!!


I guess we'll see about Steorn...I think they might have something  
but wish they'd cut all the smoke and mysteryas it just  
confuses the issue.


The patent application posted at;

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser? 
Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch- 
bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=dublin&s2=mccarthy&OS=dublin+ 
AND+mccarthy&RS=dublin+AND+mccarthy


McCarthy; Shaun David - March 30, 2006 - #20060066428 - A low  
energy magnet actuator allows magnetic fields to be turned on and  
off using a small amount of energy. The magnetic actuator according  
to the invention generally includes a base suitable for the support  
of a plurality of magnets. An actuatable shield is positioned in  
relation to the plurality of magnets so that it effectively blocks  
the magnetic field when it is positioned over at least one of the  
magnets. The magnetic fields of the plurality of magnets interact  
in a manner that allows low energy actuation of the shield. - A low  
energy magnet actuator allows magnetic fields to be turned on and  
off using a small amount of energy. The magnetic actuator according  
to the invention generally includes a base suitable for the support  
of a plurality of magnets. An actuatable shield is 

[Keelynet] Steorn claims vs Jack Hilden-Brands invention

2006-09-01 Thread Jerry Decker - KN

Hola Folks!

Looks like Dan got the list working right again...it wasn't sending to 
the archive and then not even to the list, but all better now...thanks Dan!


I suspect most everyone knows about the claims of this Irish group 
Steorn, that they have a rotating magnetic device which I believe they 
estimate at 218% efficient?


In the keelynet.com news I had tracked the patent and included a diagram 
with their description of how their shielding method worked.


There are NUMEROUS patents for shielding methods and one of the most 
famous is Ecklin.


http://www.kz1300.com/ecklin/

And there is also Jack Hilden-Brands invention of a method of switching 
off any natural magnetic field, either mechanically or electronically 
with very little power.  He kindly send me both the mechanical and 
electronic prototypes which I tested and was totally amazed with.  He 
has gone MUCH FURTHER and has a motor he estimates is 600% efficient and 
thats just an early prototype as he thinks his new one will be far more 
efficient. See;


http://www.keelynet.com/energy/hildenbrand.htm

What is interesting...Jack showed his technology at a product fair, has 
a patent app well before Steorn and has been working on his for years 
now.  So I wonder if Steorn saw or stumbled on his information and made 
a crude model which they have run to patent.


Plus the comments on some websites about how they were essentially an 
information company in an earlier incarnation and had converted to a 
security products company, now put an advert in the Economist, not 
Sci-AM or any physics or electronics media...as the Economist is read by 
finance type people, not scientists.  Peculiar approach.


Plus the 10% of scientists who they claim have verified the claim won't 
come forth with their names or to back it up.


This is one comment about it from a weblog;

"The more I think about this I am of two minds: 1. These guys really do 
think they've succeeded in breaking the laws of thermodynamics. 2. 
Recall that Steorn is a former e-business company that saw its market 
vanish during the dot.com bust. It stands to reason that Steorn has 
re-tooled as a Web marketing company, and is using the "free energy" 
promotion as a platform to show future clients how it can leverage print 
advertising and a slick Web site to promote their products and ideas. If 
so, it's a pretty brilliant strategy."

-
I KNOW it is possible to redirect magnetic flux (you can't actually 
shield it, but you can cancel or redirect it) as I've seen it in Jacks 
devices, so perhaps they do have something.


Jack has switched off the field of a magnet holding 400 pounds of 
weight, but using only some 8 Watts of power...and in one configuration, 
it was 80 pounds of lift switched off with just .6 Watts...yes, you read 
that right600mW!!!


So you can imagine how a motor could be designed that was like the EV 
Gray motor but using natural magnets being switched on and off to 
produce rotation and torque.  And apply that to generators!!!


I guess we'll see about Steorn...I think they might have something but 
wish they'd cut all the smoke and mysteryas it just confuses the issue.


The patent application posted at;

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=dublin&s2=mccarthy&OS=dublin+AND+mccarthy&RS=dublin+AND+mccarthy

McCarthy; Shaun David - March 30, 2006 - #20060066428 - A low energy 
magnet actuator allows magnetic fields to be turned on and off using a 
small amount of energy. The magnetic actuator according to the invention 
generally includes a base suitable for the support of a plurality of 
magnets. An actuatable shield is positioned in relation to the plurality 
of magnets so that it effectively blocks the magnetic field when it is 
positioned over at least one of the magnets. The magnetic fields of the 
plurality of magnets interact in a manner that allows low energy 
actuation of the shield. - A low energy magnet actuator allows magnetic 
fields to be turned on and off using a small amount of energy. The 
magnetic actuator according to the invention generally includes a base 
suitable for the support of a plurality of magnets. An actuatable shield 
is positioned in relation to the plurality of magnets so that it 
effectively blocks the magnetic field when it is positioned over at 
least one of the magnets. The magnetic fields of the plurality of 
magnets interact in a manner that allows low energy actuation of the shield.


As you can see, it gives some information about the flux redirection 
technique, but to my eyes, it looks rather primitive when compared to 
Jack Hilden-Brands original version.  In other words, it looks like a 
cheap copy...


Since his application preceded theirs, no matter what they try to claim, 
he'll win the case.  So let them have their day and I hope it does prove 
out with many replications of