Re: [Interest] Official linuxdeployqt ?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 12:31:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt via Interest wrote: > > When your OpenSource project includes the scripts to make a proper > > Debian or RPM package, you dramatically increase the odds of getting > > your package into the actual distro repos. Does any distro actually put >

[Interest] Small survey on necessary Qt Container size

Hi all. In order to base my potential arguments in a certain discussion on a neighboring list not purely just on my own experience with both Qt and (independently) large data (a.k.a. "gut feeling") I would appreciate if /you/ could help me to find a - very rough, readily admitted in advance to

Re: [Interest] spurious breakpoints in Qt Creator

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:09:43AM +0200, Elvis Stansvik wrote: >Den sön 15 maj 2022 21:45Matej Košík <[1]q...@matej-kosik.net> skrev: > > Hi, > > While using Qt Creator, I noticed that it generates "spurious > breakpoints". > > How to reproduce: > - I start Qt

Re: [Interest] QtCreator >= 6 - Problems using code indentation shift with tab key

On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 06:28:34AM +0100, Nuno Santos wrote: > Kevin, > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Is anyone from the Qt Creator team around and aware of this? Is this a new > setting? A bug? A feature? > > Should we open bug report? That would probably be the best approach. Andre' >

Re: [Interest] Qt creator latest version for Qt 5.15.7

On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:14:01AM +0530, Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: >Hi, >Can you let me know latest Qt creator version compatible with Qt 5.15.7? It is. Andre' ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org

Re: [Interest] Android debugger: ignore SIGILL

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 02:34:06PM +0300, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > Hello, > > I'm  using OpenSSL in my Qt Android project. Every time I start debugging, > Qt Creator interrupts execution at the very start of the app and shows me > the following: > > (Signal Received The inferior stopped

Re: [Interest] Warning about QHash keys().toVector()

On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 06:20:31PM +0200, Kevin André wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following piece of code: > > QVector CompatibilityInterfaceImpl::getActionIds() const > { > return _actions.keys().toVector(); // _actions is a QHash > } > > In Qt Creator this generates the

Re: [Interest] Guide me through the Qt offerings for GUIs

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 06:41:17PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote: > > One thing I noticed contributing to this effect is that it is apparently > > difficult to pass objects of "medium" complexity through the glue layer > > Simple stuff like integers and strings are fine (enums already get > >

Re: [Interest] Guide me through the Qt offerings for GUIs

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:31:33PM +0100, Nuno Santos wrote: >For me, the major benefit of Qml is speed. Before using Qml I’ve done a >couple of years doing Qt Widgets. The glue code to make things work is a >big pain. Hi Nuno. This is an interesting statement. My personal

Re: [Interest] Guide me through the Qt offerings for GUIs

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:42:50PM +0200, Jason H wrote: >You probably won't  -- it's too new. Unless you call automotive >Infotainment consoles success stories. >The lack of proper QtQuick Controls (v2) held it back for a while. >  >Personally, I think the exsting QtQuick

Re: [Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience methods (was: Mixing Commercial and Open...)

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:17:02PM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > [...] > The other reason was more profound and related to the deprecation of these > APIs, meaning that in the huge majority of usages found was a form of > algorithmic abuse. Should we offer APIs which facilitate

Re: [Interest] The willy-nilly deletion of convenience, methods (was: Mixing Commercial and Open...)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:09:51PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 22 March 2021 14:55:04 PDT Roland Hughes wrote: > > A deprecation message at compile time is __not__ a warning to the > > installed base. This is especially true for things that were built with > > earlier versions of Qt

Re: [Interest] QtCreator annoying message

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:38:41AM +, Kai Köhne wrote: > I also have that sometimes on Windows, but couldn’t quite figure out what > causes it. So maybe we can make it reproducible .. I get it regularly when I start Creator from the command line and then change my mind, usually because I

Re: [Interest] rebooted QtWebKit for Qt4??

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 06:02:00PM -0700, Donald Carr wrote: > [...] > It is sad to see people miss the necessity for hardware accelerated UI > that QML addresses Qt widgets backing onto QPainter was extremely > problematic to accelerate and the Qt company addressed this with > scenegraph/QML. It

Re: [Interest] Set manipulation in Qt 6

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:34:11PM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > With my hat of the guy going around and deprecating toSet() and friends: the > rationale for these deprecations is the terrible code that those methods > encourage, and the While I sympathize to some degree with the

Re: [Interest] Set manipulation in Qt 6

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:44:19AM +0200, Vadim Peretokin wrote: >Being good users open-source of Qt, [1]we're looking into our >compatibility early on to help report any issues and we're finding this >compatibility code to be rather problematic from the developer >experience point

Re: [Interest] QMake contains and include

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:30:41PM +, Jérôme Godbout wrote: >It kinda work, it’s really weird, but all the project get display, the >.pri and the include/source no matter the condition, but they are grey >out if the include condition is false, so it does scan the .pri no >

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:04:38AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 19/04/2020 08.23, André Pönitz wrote: > > QVariant(TypeA) and QVariant(TypeB) can be ordered for different TypeA and > > TypeB based e.g. on alphabetical order of their .typeName(). > > > > If

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:40:24AM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > Before bikeshedding on the actual semantics we _want_ to have: if they > don't 100% match the ones we have right now, then it's a silent breakage > for end-users, which is a very bad idea. In other cases this such

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:21:39PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > I don't think we need "incomparable" here. > > > > QVariant(TypeA) and QVariant(TypeB) can be ordered for different TypeA and > > TypeB based e.g. on alphabetical order of their .typeName(). > > > > If wanted, this can be

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Sonntag, 19. April 2020 13:05:05 CEST André Pönitz wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On Saturday, 18 April 2020 12:57:55 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:44:40PM -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 18 April 2020 12:57:55 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > > I guess that's the reason for dropping the comparisons in 6.0 and, > > eventually, reintroduce it in 7.0. With the hope that we've learned the > >

Re: [Interest] QVariant compare operator

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 04:53:04PM +0200, Bernhard Lindner wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Relational comparisons with QVariant are deprecated in 5.15 and will be > > > > removed because they are a misfeaure. > > > > Redesign your code so your question does not need to be asked. > > > > > > Could you

Re: [Interest] Qt Account email verification needed

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:32:01PM +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > On 29/01/2020 15:01, The Qt Company wrote: > > Thank you for creating a Qt Account. Please verify your email > > address 'interest@qt-project.org' within 72 hours to complete the > > registration process. > > ^ This

Re: [Interest] Klocwork errors in Qt

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 02:36:37PM +1300, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 13:05, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > > IMHO, it is legit to write code like: > > > const QUrl url(urlString); > > > const auto appId = url.host() + "." + url.path().mid(1); > > > doSomeThing(appId); //

Re: [Interest] CPU load in busy indicator widget based on Q(Variant)Animation

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:58:44PM +0200, René J. V. Bertin wrote: > Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest wrote: > > > By default non-QQ2 related animations run every 16ms. Do you have a > > minimal testcase showcasing a suspicious activity of an animation? > > I never said anything about suspicious

Re: [Interest] QPainter drawLine zValue?

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:28:17PM -0800, Israel Brewster wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2019, at 12:26 PM, Jason H wrote: > > > > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:06 PM From: "Israel Brewster" > >> To: "Giuseppe D'Angelo" > >> Cc: > >> interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re:

Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:57:27PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 August 2019 12:09:02 PDT Roland Hughes wrote: > > If you do not need the latest bells and whistles, drop back to Qt 4.8 > > No, don't. That is not receiving security fixes. To make this a valid line of reasoning

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.9 app with multiple display sizes

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 10:19:25PM +0530, Ramakanth Kesireddy wrote: > Hi, > > Our Qt app is based out of Qt 5.6 C++ widgets. Inorder to support for > multiple display sizes on embedded linux, could you please let me know if > it is recommended to move the existing app to Qt Quick app? Qt

Re: [Interest] Debugger encountered an exception

On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 02:59:20PM -0700, David M. Cotter wrote: > on Windows, has anyone seen the debugger itself throwing an exception like > this: > > > Debugger encountered an exception: > > Exception at 0x7fffaffd9129, code: 0xe0434352: , > > flags=0x1 (execution cannot be continued)

Re: [Interest] Operator QMap[] is casting to int?

On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 05:49:03PM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > > (Honorable mention: QStringView is 64-bit ready.) > > You were asking when static_casts between int and size_t are needed. > Interfacing Qt-based code with Standard Library types is one of such cases. C++20 and

Re: [Interest] android deployment is painfully slow (Windows 10, Qt Creator 4.8.2)

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 11:13:39AM +0300, Alexander Ivash wrote: > ...ooops, previous email got truncated, not sure why > > Maybe there is something wrong with my environment, not sure, but it takes > several minutes to even start debugging! In android studio it happens much > much > faster... >

Re: [Interest] QTabWidget scroll buttons

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:19:37PM +, Murphy, Sean wrote: > > > there doesn't appear to be an easy way to add widgets in the tab widget's > > tab bar. > > > > QTabWidget::tabBar(), layout(), addItem() ? > > I meant "easy" in the sense of a functions like these (which don't exist): >

Re: [Interest] QTabWidget scroll buttons

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:02:42PM +, Murphy, Sean wrote: > Honestly, an decent solution would be where if I could modify the tab widget's > tab bar to never show the scroll buttons (easy enough with the > usesScrollButtons > property), and instead always show the tool button. This looks

Re: [Interest] QTabWidget scroll buttons

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:15:19AM -0400, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Instead, you might want to look at e.g. KDevelop, Konqueror or Falkon > (maybe Qt Creator can be added to that list also?) to see what they do. Qt Creator is notorious for not using tabs. Or at least it was notorious, looks like

Re: [Interest] QTabWidget scroll buttons

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:56:00PM +, Murphy, Sean wrote: > Is there a way to get access to the scroll buttons on a QTabWidget to > customize > them? You can always check where the code driving the feature hides in the code and then drill down using findChild() in the application. From a

Re: [Interest] QProcess overload slot connection

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 08:14:38AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday, 14 March 2019 07:04:53 PDT Jason H wrote: > > perhaps adding a QProcess::notRunning signal is in order? Or at least some > > clarification in the docs? > > Sorry, no. Just the name of the signal you proposed shows

Re: [Interest] Get rid of "Could not connect to the in-process QML debugger"

On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 05:10:24AM +0300, Alexander Dyagilev wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way to get rid of this annoying message from Qt Creator > debugger? By switching off the QML debugger in the run configuration. Andre' ___ Interest mailing

Re: [Interest] Individual static analysis warning suppression in Qt Creator

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 09:55:12AM +0100, Bernhard Lindner wrote: > Hi! > > > This is https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-20201 > > Again, thanks a lot for your help! > > Such a significant defect... still it isn't even evaluated :-( Not every field in JIRA is actively used. Andre'

Re: [Interest] Android IRC channels

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:45:58AM +, Mitch Curtis wrote: > We have #necessitas for Android discussion, Right. > and I remember #qtforandroid was recently created after the spam > attacks. Today I learned we also have #qt-android. #qt-android has been the hideout during the spam attack. I

Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:52:07AM +0300, coroberti . wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > >> > It might

Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform > kit name structure. This has irked me for a while, too. > > I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop Qt > 5.10.1 for iOS Qt

Re: [Interest] Chromium build failure, SSL and Qt 5.6.3 vs 5.6.0,

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:09:03AM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 31 July 2018 at 23:55, Kai Koehne wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Interest On Behalf > >> Of Christian Gagneraud > >> [...] > >> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. > >> >> I recently had

Re: [Interest] qmlscene install problems (was: Interest, Digest, Vol 82, , Issue 5)

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 09:51:22AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > When the virus known as QML was unleashed on the world, Released in September 2010. > the "teaser app" was the Welcome screen in QtCreator. First draft in November 2010, submitted in June 2011, release in September 2011. Andre'

Re: [Interest] qmlscene install problems (was: Interest, Digest, Vol 82, Issue 5)

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:10:20AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > On 07/16/2018 11:10 AM, Ulf Hermann wrote: > > And none of that has anything to do with qmlscene being installed or not, or > > how Qt Creator deals with it. Also, the qmlscene utility and the QML > > language > > are two rather

Re: [Interest] How to programatically make a tab's text bold?

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:10:07AM +, Vadim Peretokin wrote: > How can I programatically make a tab's text bold? I'm looking to notify the > user that they need to look at it. > > Note that this is different from using a stylesheet to set the selected tab > bold - I'd like to set any random

Re: [Interest] QtCreator, the past...

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:59:12PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > Real programmers use edlin.exe That would imply using Windows. Nah... Andre' ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:03:46PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > > are there plans to retire QtWebKit support, migrate to using QtWebEngine > > > or > > > to improve QTextBrowser's HTML support? > > > > WebEngine is plainly inacceptable as dependency for QTextBrowser which is > > part > >

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:10:26PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 10 November 2017 11:41:56 PST André Pönitz wrote: > > > are there plans to retire QtWebKit support, migrate to using QtWebEngine > > > or to improve QTextBrowser's HTML support? > > > >

Re: [Interest] [Development] Short/medium term evolution of the Assistant?

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Friday November 10 2017 13:19:39 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > > >(switched mailing list to interest since this post is not about qt > >development per se) > > Where Qt development does come in is with this: > > are there plans

Re: [Interest] Flickering when animating QWidget resize

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:26:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Friday, 25 August 2017 09:26:22 PDT Michael Jackson wrote: > > In our application, we are attempting to create a "fly out" effect with a > > QWidget based window and when the animation happens the QWidget flickers > > badly. We

Re: [Interest] QML debugger doesn't work for big cmake-based project

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 05:48:43PM +0300, Alexander Ivash wrote: > I'm experiencing issues with enabling QML debugger for huge > cmake-based project. I've added add_definitions(-DQT_QML_DEBUG) and > enabled checkbox in Qt Creator but breakpoints never triggered. On > launching debugger I see 'QML

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 68, Issue 13

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:17:22PM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > > On 05/18/2017 08:31 AM, Kevin Funk wrote: > >Citing you from the thread: > >>... > >>No, KDevelop does things completely different from Qt so not an > >>option... > >>... > >KDevelop is an IDE, Qt is an application development

Re: [Interest] Getting a QImage from an QML Image, protocol, , agnostic QImage?

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:56:18AM -0500, Roland Hughes wrote: > And some 12 year old kid will do a Web search, find the interest archive > messages then do exactly that. Once they release their app into the wild > they will be in all kinds of legal trouble. That is why I chimed in. These > posts

Re: [Interest] Optimizing performance with hundreds of widgets

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:28:22PM +, Gibbs, Matt wrote: > Hi All, > > I’m working on a Qt-based project to display rapidly updating > information from a control system. I want to display hundreds of > signals, each updating at about 10 Hz. As a performance test, I’ve > thrown 500 Labels in

Re: [Interest] QDateTime Issue in Qt5.8.0 msvc2013,msvc2015

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 09:46:13AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em quarta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2017, às 16:33:33 PST, Günter Michel > escreveu: > > OK my fault, qDebug() results are also ok here, seems debug view related. > > I have looked at debugger Output in Qt Creator 4.2.0 ( dt

Re: [Interest] Debugging helpers in Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Viktor Engelmann wrote: > If it has to do with certain variables, then that only makes sense if > the "locals and expressions" panel wants to display an object that has > been deleted already, so there would be a dangling pointer. Does that > happen in

Re: [Interest] Debugging helpers in Ubuntu

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:56:28AM +0100, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Hi, > > I have a fresh & clean Ubuntu 16.04 install which is up to date. > > With QtCreator, if I enable the debugging helpers and stop on some > breakpoints, I get a bunch of "Segmentation fault" dialog boxes opening >

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.8.0 RC build under windows

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2017 00:20:03 PST Prav wrote: > > So finally : Qt version 5.8.0 can NOT be build under Win7 with Win7SDK!? (It > > seems Qt for desktop need some definitions from WinRT ... who know why) > > Qt

Re: [Interest] Failed first try with Qt on Android

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 06:35:32PM +0300, Serge K via Interest wrote: > I think this question better ask in conventional Qt-user's forums. This here is the conventional Qt User forum. Andre' [And no, I can't answer the original question. Last time I tried SameGame on Android a couple of months

Re: [Interest] Which "Widget" technology to use when starting a new desktop app

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:03:56PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > > > After watching the webinar "The Curse of Choice: An overview of GUI > > technologies in Qt?"[1] I am even more confused as to what to use for > > our new desktop app. Here are a few of the background details. The app > > will be

Re: [Interest] QtDesigner needs redesign.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:40:51PM +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > On 2 Jan 2017, at 14:15, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > > > On segunda-feira, 2 de janeiro de 2017 13:55:43 BRST Serge K via > > Interest wrote: > >> Is there anybody now creating NEW QtDesigner?

Re: [Interest] QtDesigner needs redesign.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 01:55:43PM +0300, Serge K via Interest wrote: > I used QtCreator with older Qt versions. Now I use QtCreator 4.0.1 > with Qt5.6.1 but I cannot see major difference between it's QtDesigner > and old one. There is none. > Through years Designer remains the same with ugly >

Re: [Interest] 2017

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:50:06PM -0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 3 de janeiro de 2017 16:19:27 BRST René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > >Another alternative of course is to use some other client-server protocol > > >such that only the “model” of MVC is on the server, and UI rendering > >

Re: [Interest] QLineEdit::editingFinshied()

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:55:11PM +0100, André Somers wrote: > > > Op 29/11/2016 om 15:53 schreef Duane: > >On 29/11/2016 9:16 AM, Duane wrote: > >>On 29/11/2016 8:54 AM, Robert Buchinger wrote: > > > >Putting a breakpoint in the code was causing the focusOut to fire when the > >slot was hit

Re: [Interest] Qt containers deprecated with 5.0?

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0100, André Somers wrote: > There is nothing wrong with using Qt containers either (with the exception > of QList (Irrational hatred [TM]) Andre' ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:43:37AM +0300, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > I quite like QML as a declarative markup language, but am less enthused > > about > > JavaScript. It seems like kind of a toy programming language. I'm a bit > > shocked that you can write "code" where you can happily call

Re: [Interest] What you don't like about Qt

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:13:44PM +0200, Jason H wrote: > > > Not an isolated case. Client after client tells the same story. The > > licensing > > team at Digia must be paid on commission because _every_ use requires a > > license when you first contact them. > > FWIW, My dealings with the

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:42:44AM +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2016, at 22:52, Rob Allan wrote: > > My biggest gripe is that the Qt Quick object model seems to be much > > more poorly supported in C++ than it is in QML. For example, in C++ > > you really

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:43PM +0100, Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > It's not unusual for us developers and contributors to lose > perspective of what's important. > After many years spent on very particular implementation details, it > becomes difficult to see outside of the box. > >

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:37:01AM +0200, Xavier Bigand wrote: > I am using Qt for my day job, > > Our first difficulty with Qt is the release cycle that is really long and the > difficulty to test the futur versions. As we often need the latest features > or > bug fixes, waiting 3-4 month

Re: [Interest] Using QtQuick Controls 2 on android

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:10:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Baron wrote: > > Am 07.09.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Alexandru Croitor: > >If my memory serves, it used to work about a year ago with Qt 5.5 + Quick > >Controls 1, because I tested a QML app on an Android emulator. Don't know > >what changed now. > >

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6LTS vs 5.7+

On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 07:38:18PM +, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > -Original Message- From: Interest > > [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- project.org] On > > Behalf Of Roland Hughes Sent: sunnuntaina 4. syyskuuta 2016 21.14 To: > > 2202873.hgKzyLeXCm@patux.local;

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:16:46PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 20:23:44 PDT André Pönitz wrote: > > > Stop using QtWidgets, including QtWebView and QLabel, and transition > > > to Qt Quick instead. Qt Quick uses the GPU, QtWidgets do no

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:10:37PM +, J-P Nurmi wrote: > > On 06 Jul 2016, at 19:41, Uwe Rathmann > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:58:48 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> > >> So what you want isn't QWidget with OpenGL support. We've proven it > >> won't

Re: [Interest] Utilizing the GPU, how to start?

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 05:41:33PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 5 de julho de 2016 11:45:41 PDT Jason Kretzer wrote: > > How does one get Qt widgets to take advantage of a GPU? If this > > question seem naïve, it is because it is. > > > > With my application, I am displaying

Re: [Interest] Qt ownership model

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 08:13:40PM +0300, Антон Жилин wrote: > The aim of these suggestions is not to change how memory management works > in Qt, but to wrap it in a uniform syntax, and by the way, eliminate the > need for explicit usage of `new`. > We need to view each case of memory allocation

Re: [Interest] Why int for size() of containers instead of quint32?

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:29:38PM +0300, Николай Шатохин wrote: > Hello. > > I see that Qt uses int type many times in containers implementations? Why? > Why do you not use your own quint32? Why do you using signed and platform > dependent type for this purpose? Both signed-vs-unsigned, and

Re: [Interest] Preferred way to create custom look-and-feel GUI

On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:40:02PM +0200, Jan Müller wrote: > What does QtCreator use to implement the GUI? A few of the ~50 standard plugins (the Welcome screen and the QML tooling) are using Qt Quick but the bulk of plugins as well as the shell including the mode bar on the left are all Qt

Re: [Interest] using cmake to build Qt projects.

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:54:53AM -0400, william.croc...@analog.com wrote: > > > > >>I have never been able to get creator to work. The 5 series won't even run > >>under my versions of VNC and the NX virtual desktops. This apparently due > >>to a > >>dependency on new visual fluff. > > > >Qt

Re: [Interest] using cmake to build Qt projects.

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:53:54AM -0400, Bill Crocker wrote: > >>I am trying to port my Qt project to a cmake based build so I can use CLion > >>for debugging. > > > >Why is CLion preferable for you to do Qt debugging, opposed to e.g. using Qt > >Creator? > > > > Because CLion works out of the

Re: [Interest] What's the recommended way to put QObjects in smart pointers?

On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:24:48AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 04/05/16 21:35, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >On quarta-feira, 4 de maio de 2016 20:56:52 PDT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> From what I can tell, QPointer does not delete the object, so that's a > >>no go. > >> > >>Putting the

Re: [Interest] Broken Android gdb debugging ?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:02:13PM +, Edward Sutton wrote: > Thank you Andre. > > After rolling back to r10E I still cannot deploy and debug. It no > longer hangs at the deploy stage. This is an improvement. > > The Android Kit GDB Server is still pointing to the Android Studio >

Re: [Interest] Broken Android gdb debugging ?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:57:55PM +, Edward Sutton wrote: > My Android gdb debugging and deployment broke recently after I switched from > Eclipse to Android Studio and installed Qt 5.6.0. > > I am not sure what to check? Try NDK 10e, not 11b or 11c Andre'

Re: [Interest] Very large QRC file

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:49:41PM +, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > > > > CONFIG += resources_big > > > Nice. Since 5.4. Never knew. "Just works". Thanks! > > > What does this flag do? It replaces the creation of a big .cpp with a char[] containing the data by two passes, first

Re: [Interest] Very large QRC file

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:39:02PM +0100, Jason H wrote: > I have a qrc devoted to media: audio and video. It's only about 100 > megs total of both (2 videos and several languages for each). It > results in about a 500MB cpp file. It takes 8 gigs to compile, which > is what my hardware ram is, so

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:23:48AM +0300, Constantin Makshin wrote: > Another thing I personally don't like in the new connection syntax is > that it forces signals to be public, making it possible to do all type > of wonders by faking/simulating events on behalf of other objects. > > For

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +, Gian Maxera wrote: > > I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I don't intend to ever use > > the old-style connect syntax, is there a reason to have "public > > slots:" anymore? > > One reason that for me it’s fundamental: Readability of your code !!!

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:02:17PM +, Scott Aron Bloom wrote: > I prefer “slotFoo” and “slotBar” as well as “sigFoo” and “sigBar” > > It really lets the methods stand out as slots and signals.. It also means, > don’t > think “sender()” can ever valid if you are not in a “slotXYZ” function.

Re: [Interest] Are slots even needed these days?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:35:39AM +0100, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > > Am 16.03.2016 um 22:37 schrieb André Pönitz <apoen...@t-online.de>: > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:31:33PM +, Gian Maxera wrote: > >>> I can connect to Foo::bar either way. If I do

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator cannot debug on iPad device, Xcode has no problem with same iPad?

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:11:38PM +0300, Robert Iakobashvili wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Edward Sutton edward.sut...@subsite.com wrote: Hi Robert, Thank you for your patience and detailed steps. I understand now. All is good! -Ed Great. I'd say that

Re: [Interest] QVariantMap: constEnd() not equal to end()?

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:35:20AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On 25/03/15 05:16, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday 24 March 2015 17:29:39 Gunnar Roth wrote: Does anybody know why QT_STRICT_ITERATORS is not standard? First, because it breaks existing, legitimate code that mixes const and

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Alejandro Exojo wrote: El Wednesday 11 March 2015, Bernhard escribió: However currently both sites seem unusable. gitbounty says nothing more than Coming Soon... and bountysource display an effectively empty page when clicking on some Qt issue (on

Re: [Interest] Qt Performance : QT Widget Application vs WPF

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:19:42PM +0530, Chandralatha Harish wrote: Hi All, I was trying to evaluate QT vs WPF in terms of Memory , Performance , Window HAndles, User objects, GDI and so on.. So built 2 identical looking controls in WPF and QT with all values harcoded. BAsically a

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:42:05AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: On Wednesday February 04 2015 23:44:25 André Pönitz wrote: Hi, The solution is to start LLDB, and use the Python it links to implicitly by using the LLDB 'script' command, instead of hoping that the system Python

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:33:09AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: On Thursday February 05 2015 08:22:09 Harri Pasanen wrote: llbd script run our script but that doesn't strike me as very elegant either. If it is a long running script, it seems quite elegant to me, as I solves the

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator (Mac) Debugger should use the system python executable

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:09:47PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: Hello, The recent discussion about debugging with Qt Creator on OS X reminded me of an issue I encountered with the version that's installed obligatorily by the Digia Qt installer. The embedded debugger uses a python

Re: [Interest] Qt 5 Creator 3.3 (Mac) Debugger locks up with endless error logging of DW_AT_specification(address) has no decl

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 03:11:48PM -0800, Jim Prouty wrote: I'm hoping someone can tell me how we can fix our Qt development environment to avoid this frustration: Way too often Qt Creator 3.3 completely locks up when it hits certain breakpoints in our app using our self-compiled Qt 5.4.1 on

Re: [Interest] Qt container size()

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Felix morack wrote: Is there any reason for this? Why dont they use size_t like the STL and the rest of the world? It's 2015, people will increasingly bump into this limitation - i just did. If you have 2^31 items or more in a container you *need*

Re: [Interest] porting to Qt 5.4 - MOC very slow on Windows

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:00:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On 15/01/15 19:23, Koehne Kai wrote: IIRC moc in Qt 5 got much more accurate in the parsing phase, which might mean it now parses included headers that it previously missed. 2 - 3 seconds is quite long though ... Maybe

  1   2   >