I too was suprised by Vadim's reply. Often there is a dicsussion here before deciding it is a bug or operator error or something else. Vadim's suggested use of going straight to the bug tracker does not seem to fit with the purpose of this list.
FWIW, I am on mac (2016 MBPro) with two
On 16 Sep 2019, at 16:56, Alexander Dyagilev
mailto:alervd...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On my android 9.0 phone it returns one "/" volume only. But I have SD card
installed.
Is it a bug? Should I file a report?
Back when we implemented QStorageInfo it looked like this for me on one device
that I
On 9/16/19 10:41 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 16/09/2019 14:44, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 9/16/19 5:00 AM,interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Il 14/09/19 14:53, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Please keep in mind there is no version of SSL which is secure.
Do you have any reference/source
Hi,
On 13/09/2019 16:49, David M. Cotter wrote:
this seems unexpected
Not a mac user myself, but if you have a minimal testcase, please
consider submitting a bug report.
HTH,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group
On my android 9.0 phone it returns one "/" volume only. But I have SD
card installed.
Is it a bug? Should I file a report?
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
On Monday, 16 September 2019 07:56:20 PDT Alexander Dyagilev wrote:
> On my android 9.0 phone it returns one "/" volume only. But I have SD
> card installed.
>
> Is it a bug? Should I file a report?
There was a bug parsing the mountpoints that affected Android, but I think it
was fixed a while
On 16/09/2019 18:51, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 9/16/19 10:41 AM, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 16/09/2019 14:44, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 9/16/19 5:00 AM,interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Il 14/09/19 14:53, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Please keep in mind there is no version of SSL which is
On Monday, 16 September 2019 11:48:20 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest
wrote:
> And this again just mentions that earlier SSL versions had security
> vulnerabilities. It does not sustain the claim that there is NO version
> which is secure.
>
> (As Thiago has already reminded, we're way past
On 9/16/19 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Il 14/09/19 14:53, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Please keep in mind there is no version of SSL which is secure.
Do you have any reference/source for this (quite extraordinary) claim?
You know, for you it wouldn't matter. It would be a
On 16/09/2019 14:44, Roland Hughes wrote:
On 9/16/19 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
Il 14/09/19 14:53, Roland Hughes ha scritto:
Please keep in mind there is no version of SSL which is secure.
Do you have any reference/source for this (quite extraordinary) claim?
You know,
10 matches
Mail list logo
