Re: [Interest] [Development] [Releasing] download.qt.io is down

://bugreports.qt.io/secure/CreateIssueDetails!init.jspa?pid=10510&issuetype=1&components=19211 Yours, Tuukka From: Alexandre Ribeiro Date: Wednesday, 27. January 2021 at 14.24 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Qt Project Development , Interests Qt Subject: Re: [Interest] [Dev

Re: [Interest] [Development] [Releasing] download.qt.io is down

link for filing a bug for the right component: https://bugreports.qt.io/secure/CreateIssueDetails!init.jspa?pid=10510&issuetype=1&components=19211 Yours, Tuukka From: Alexandre Ribeiro Date: Wednesday, 27. January 2021 at 14.24 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Qt Project Dev

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

Hi, The plan has been not to tag the release in the public repo as part of the commercial-lts phase. Yours, Tuukka From: Interest on behalf of Benjamin TERRIER Date: Thursday, 4. March 2021 at 16.21 To: Qt Interest Subject: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag Hi, Given that

Re: [Interest] Qt WebEngine 5.15.3 tag

Hi, I do understand the desire to have a supported / tagged release of QWE and it is possible that it might even work quite well on an earlier release of Qt. However, we are testing it in conjunction with the other changes of a new patch level release and do not want to give a guarantee that n

Re: [Interest] Mixing Commercial and Open Source license for different projects

Hi James, You asked if it is allowed for a developer who has purchased commercial license of Qt for project A to work on project B using open-source license of Qt. Assuming that these projects are separate (independent and not related to each other in any way), this is possible. The reason for

Re: [Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 114, Issue 23

Hi, Feedback on the Qt 6 API is valuable and we are very interested in it. Portability was one of the key design principles and we have avoided making changes when not needed. That said, there can surely be some items that are unnecessarily changed. Knowing what is the problem and the intende

Re: [Interest] the path forward - that 7 year thing - was, , willy-nilly

“When Qt chased these markets it knew what the lifetimes would be. Now it has abandoned them.” I would like to point out that this is not a true statement. We do offer long term support and also extended support for those customers who need it. There are some who every now and then still need s

Re: [Interest] the path forward - that 7 year thing - was, , willy-nilly

, maaliskuuta 28, 2021 4:52 ip. Vastaanottaja: Tuukka Turunen Kopio: Roland Hughes; interest@qt-project.org; mike.jack...@bluequartz.net Aihe: Re: [Interest] the path forward - that 7 year thing - was, , willy-nilly Tukka, you (Digia, aka "QtCo") no longer offer the perpetuity clause of the lice

Re: [Interest] L Word

Hi, Perhaps we have been too long tolerant for the behavior that many see problematic (myself included). The challenge is the mix of valid and invalid items. It is easier to react to things that are clear violations to our CoC: http://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0012-Code-of-Conduct.html and

Re: [Interest] L Word

Hi, Functional safety is a complex topic with multiple different standards depending upon what you are creating. In essence the needed measures are depending upon how likely someone is to get hurt when something goes wrong. The need depends upon what is done and typically there are multiple way

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

Hi, Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in place for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc. To some extent things will work also with Qt 5.15 if you build yourself, but there are some rough edges (and Qt 5.15 is not tested for M1). Yours, Tuuk

Re: [Interest] [Development] Mac Big Sur - Qt Open-Source Support For

so far so good. Thanks! Regards, Nuno On 7 May 2021, at 11:16, Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi, Supporting Apple silicon is something we are actively working to have in place for Qt 6.2 including full CI coverage etc. To some extent things will work also w

Re: [Interest] Qt design studio with Qt 5.15.3 commercial license

Hi, Qt Design Studio is part of some commercial products (packages): https://www.qt.io/pricing If unsure how this will be for you, please contact Qt sales. Yours, Tuukka From: Interest on behalf of Ramakanth Kesireddy Date: Monday, 5. July 2021 at 12.29 To: Qt Interest Sub

Re: [Interest] Qt design studio with Qt 5.15.3 commercial license

immediately apparent. Yours, Tuukka From: Ramakanth Kesireddy Date: Monday, 5. July 2021 at 15.31 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Qt Interest Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt design studio with Qt 5.15.3 commercial license Sorry I got it wrong. I mean if we can use community edition of Qt

Re: [Interest] Qt design studio with Qt 5.15.3 commercial license

purchase Creator separately. Yours, Tuukka From: Ramakanth Kesireddy Date: Tuesday, 6. July 2021 at 10.38 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Qt Interest Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt design studio with Qt 5.15.3 commercial license Thanks for the detailed response. Is it applicable even for the

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.2.0 RC released

Hi, We have gotten a lot of valuable feedback on the Qt 6.2 pre-releases and the RC looks very solid. There are always some things to fix, and now it is crucially important to get all feedback quickly to the release team. There is time to fix issues before the Qt 6.2.0 final, but that requires

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 LTS vs Qt 6.2 LTS

Hi, Without knowing the details, of course a bit difficult to give definite guidance. Generally, if you are now using an earlier release of Qt, it is a good approach to first migrate to Qt 5.15 and fix all deprecation warnings etc before migrating to Qt 6.x. Just from the development / porting

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 LTS vs Qt 6.2 LTS

Hi Roland et al, Certain industries have also defined approach to safety by separating the safety critical functionality from other functionality. Typically, in these the approach is such that the system needs to ensure the safety critical functionality to work with desired likelihood and the o

Re: [Interest] Qt add on modules in Qt 6.2 commercial license

Hi, These are dual licensed, so in that manner the code is available for both commercial and open-source users. However, as you can see from https://www.qt.io/product/qt6/qt-5-15-vs-6-2-feature-comparison none of these is currently released or supported for Qt 6.2. Yours, Tuuk

Re: [Interest] Graphical edition of state machines in QT

Hi, With the new Qt SCXML module you need to use an external editor that can output SCXML format, or edit manually your SCXML state machine description. Yours, Tuukka > -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Beh

Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features?

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Michael R Nelson > Sent: keskiviikkona 22. kesäkuuta 2016 19.11 > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features? > > I have to say I completely agree w

Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features?

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Jason H > Sent: maanantaina 27. kesäkuuta 2016 21.15 > To: "Daniel França" > Cc: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features? > > > Could we possibly c

Re: [Interest] Qt LGPLv3 and Qt LGPL Exception

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin TERRIER > Sent: tiistaina 28. kesäkuuta 2016 11.40 > To: qt qt > Subject: [Interest] Qt LGPLv3 and Qt LGPL Exception > > Hi everyone, > > Within the topic "[Dev

Re: [Interest] Qt LGPLv3 and Qt LGPL Exception

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin TERRIER > Sent: keskiviikkona 29. kesäkuuta 2016 9.13 > To: qt qt > Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt LGPLv3 and Qt LGPL Exception > > 2016-06-28 20:53 GMT+02:00 André S

Re: [Interest] GPL violator

Hi, Yes, please report to le...@qt-project.org with as much details as possible, including the product in question, Qt version (if known), country (countries) as well as other details available. Yours, Tuukka From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6LTS vs 5.7+

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Roland Hughes > Sent: sunnuntaina 4. syyskuuta 2016 21.14 > To: 2202873.hgKzyLeXCm@patux.local; Interests Qt project.org> > Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt 5.6LTS vs 5.7+ > >

Re: [Interest] Qt for Integrity

Hi, Full support for INTEGRITY is still with Qt 4.8 version. There is work ongoing by Rolland and others to bring new versions of Qt to support INTEGRITY and basics work already. Rather than using Qt 5.5.1, perhaps try 5.8 and help to complete the port? Yours, Tu

Re: [Interest] Can't build Qt 5.8 alpha (Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: torstaina 22. syyskuuta 2016 4.40 > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Can't build Qt 5.8 alpha (Windows) > > On quarta-feira, 21

Re: [Interest] What you don't like about Qt

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Roland Hughes > Sent: perjantaina 23. syyskuuta 2016 13.50 > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] What you don't like about Qt > > Tried replying to this e

Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt?

> -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: keskiviikkona 5. lokakuuta 2016 12.34 > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] What don't you like about Qt? > > Em quarta-feira, 5 d

Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

Hi Kim, Even partial Posix will help you get going. It is possible to do without, but then more work will be needed. When looking into QPA, perhaps the one for INTEGRITY is the one that you want to start with. What kind of hardware and applications you are thinking about? Yours, Tuu

Re: [Interest] Priority of bugs

Hi, Just to note that more than “two minor fixes” were done related to widgets in Qt 5.11.2 of the total 262 fixes: https://bugreports.qt.io/issues/?filter=19635 Widgets is an important area and we are actively maintaining those. There is less new development than on some other areas, but Widg

Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

Hi, I focused mainly in the tooling and cross-platform features in the roadmap blog post. There are other items done as well – more than what reasonably fits into a post. Mobile is an area where we are making constant development, just like we do on desktop and embedded. Currently the biggest

Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

2019 at 11.06 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Bernhard B , "interestqt-project. org" Subject: Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter Tukka, I don't think that there is a single Mobile user that finds your reply adequate. It sounds like you're dragging Mobile users along. We need a specific m

Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter

ting device APIs? > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 11:34 PM > From: "Tuukka Turunen" > To: "Jason H" > Cc: "Bernhard B" , "interestqt-project. org" > Subject: Re: [Interest] Fwd: vs. Flutter > >

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.9 and OpenSSL 1.1?

Hi, Let's create (if not yet created) and link the QTBUG JIRA tasks for Qt 5.9 and Qt 5.12 to the mailing list. Continue discussion there. Easier than mailing list for this type of a task. In principle switch to new version should be well justified. We just need to check the practicalities.

Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy

Hi, Qt’s approach to open-source is publicly described, but perhaps a bit hidden, check for example: * Section 3 of https://www.qt.io/faq/ * https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Project_Open_Governance * https://www.qt.io/licensing/ We have been releasing new add-on modules under GPLv3 and commer

Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy

August 2019 at 22.18 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: qt qt Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy Le mer. 14 août 2019 à 20:36, Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> a écrit : Hi, Qt’s approach to open-source is publicly described, but perhaps a bit hidden, check for e

Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy

ales, they could at least contribute to growing the community. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:17 AM Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> wrote: “This is wrong to say that the only alternative to Commercial + GPLv3 is Commercial only.” I did not say the _only_ alternative. Some new th

Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy

August 2019 at 12.18 To: Tuukka Turunen , qt qt Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt free software policy Le ven. 16 août 2019 à 08:41, Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> a écrit : I do agree that we should clarify this, especially the GPLv2 and GPLv3 part is not clearly explained at qt.i

Re: [Interest] Licensing questions for iOS and Android

Hi Vyacheslav, Where are you located? It is probably easiest that our regional sales team or local reseller is in contact to discuss. Commercial Qt licensing is developer based, so each person working on the same project (e.g. same end user application) needs to have a commercial license. One

Re: [Interest] Licensing

“In the latter case, the rational is (I guess) to prevent a company, say, to work with 20 developers for 3 years on an OSS Qt license, then switch to commercial when it's time to ship the product and the team is reduced to a core maintenance crew. That late switch is unfair to companies that are

Re: [Interest] Licensing

Hi Uwe, This is not about making closed source applications with LGPL licensed Qt, or whatever kind of business is done with such. The point is that Qt as a dual licensed technology has some rules related to the commercial license option. One of these rules is that the whole team should go co

Re: [Interest] Licensing

Hi, If there is misleading or incorrect information in the website, please let us know: https://www.qt.io/contact-us/other Open-source licensing is a complex topic, so it is always easiest to look into it case by case as it depends a lot upon what and how is developed. The qt.io website trie

[Interest] Change in open-source licensing of Qt Wayland Compositor, Qt Application Manager and Qt PDF

be in effect by Qt 5.14 release timeframe and later releases. Yours, Tuukka Turunen The Qt Company ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Re: [Interest] Missing Qt versions in archives

Hi, This is due to mirror’s disk space. If the size of the mirrored folders grows too big, we lose some mirrors completely. You can find also the old releases from: http://download.qt.io/new_archive/qt/ Note that this is not mirrored, so it can be slow to download. Yours, Tuu

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi, Correct. All users need to have commercial license. It is not allowed for part of the team to use commercial and part use open-source. Even though Qt Creator is great, it can feel odd to pay for full Qt license and only use the Creator IDE. We have been thinking about selling Qt Creator

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

commercial and open-source Qt affects the case originally asked. Yours, Tuukka From: Jakub Narolewski Date: Friday 27. March 2020 at 15.27 To: Jérôme Godbout , Tuukka Turunen , Vyacheslav Lanovets , "interest@qt-project.org" Subject: RE: Re: [Interest] Qt Creator lic

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi, This seems to become a longer thread than I envisioned, as apparently my original response was not clear enough. In general, if there are any questions or concerns related to licensing, check the FAQ: https://www.qt.io/faq/ If you are looking for advise on licensing, I recommend either t

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Application Development does not allow use of open-source versions of its contents in the same project (and Qt Creator is part of Qt for Application Development). Yours, Tuukka From: Andy Date: Friday 27. March 2020 at 17.29 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Giuseppe D'Angelo , &quo

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

restriction, a company could have a team of 10 developers, but only 1 or 2 commercial license for Qt. Yours, Tuukka From: Jean-Michaël Celerier Date: Friday 27. March 2020 at 17.46 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Giuseppe D'Angelo , "interest@qt-project.org" Subject

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi Michael, Please read the commercial license agreement and the licensing FAQ. The restriction has nothing to do with open-source licensing. It is about a company, who is using a commercially licensed Qt not to use parts of the same licensed Qt product under open-source license. If there was n

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

te: Monday 30. March 2020 at 20.50 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Giuseppe D'Angelo , "interest@qt-project.org" Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers That makes no sense. Your license prevents a company from using an open-source tool? It

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

it is *not* allowed consider me a lost supporter of Qt anything. -- Michael Jackson | Owner, President BlueQuartz Software [e] mike.jack...@bluequartz.net [w] www.bluequartz.net On 3/30/20, 1:54 PM, "Tuukka Turunen" wrote: Hi Michael,

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi Thiago, As I wrote a bit earlier, for completely independent projects/products it is fine that one is using commercial and one open-source. This is much more likely to happen in a big corporation than a small company, but possible scenario in both. Note that these really should not be sam

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

to prevent. Yours, Tuukka On 31.3.2020, 15.03, "Interest on behalf of Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest" wrote: On 3/31/20 1:22 PM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > For completely independent projects/products this is fine. Note that these really should not be same or in p

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

open-source version. Yours, Tuukka From: Andy Date: Tuesday 31. March 2020 at 16.47 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Giuseppe D'Angelo , "interest@qt-project.org" Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers > "This is a

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

Hi, I apologise, if I have been unclear with words 'company' and project'. If you read the license agreement and faq behind the links I have posted multiple times, it should be rather clear what is meant. Yours, Tuukka On 31.3.2020, 18.50, "Roland Hughes" wrote: I sent

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

the revenues gained from commercial licensing. Yours, Tuukka From: Jérôme Godbout Date: Tuesday 31. March 2020 at 17.56 To: Tuukka Turunen , Andy Cc: "interest@qt-project.org" Subject: RE: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developer

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

is commercially licensed. That said, see comments inline below. Hopefully this clarifies, and does not confuse more. Yours, Tuukka From: Jean-Michaël Celerier Date: Tuesday 31. March 2020 at 22.02 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Jérôme Godbout , "interest@qt-project.org" S

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi, This disclaimer is because every case can be a bit special. We are trying to avoid a case where someone clearly violates the license and then comes with explanation, because N.N. said years ago that ABCDC is ok. The basic rules are simple: - If you use Qt under open-source, check what LGPL

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi, To me your example does not sound problematic assuming that your application is like a typical app - a clearly different thing than the store that sells apps (the store sells a lot of different apps and your is in no way relevant for operating the store etc). Also, for any particular real

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt, Commercial developers

Hi, I think you are now twisting and mixing things incorrectly. For example, working in a company who has a commercial license of Qt does not in any way hinder contributing to Qt. Yours, Tuukka On 1.4.2020, 9.32, "Interest on behalf of Roland Hughes" wrote: On 3/30/20

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

conjunction with a commercially licensed Qt. We have been considering of separately licensing some of the tools, but no decisions done yet. Yours, Tuukka From: tomek Date: Wednesday 1. April 2020 at 13.28 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Krzysztof Kawa , "interest@qt-project.org"

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

ehlke" wrote: On 27/03/2020 08.55, Tuukka Turunen wrote: > Correct. All users need to have commercial license. It is not allowed for part of the team to use commercial and part use open-source. Even though Qt Creator is great, it can feel odd to pay for full Qt license and only use the

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi Matthew, I have tried to be very clear in explaining that the whole point of this email thread is about mixing open-source and commercial, which not a the most common use case. I do not know what are the questions that I have tried to avoid answering. Yes, there are many users of Qt who use

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi Bernhard, See answers inline below. Yours, Tuukka On 2.4.2020, 12.56, "Bernhard Lindner" wrote: Hello Tuukka, maybe I missed something. Did you answer the following most critical question brought up by Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel and others? From Juergens E-Mail:

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

Hi, We have now clarified the license agreement to allow use of independent open-source items in conjunction with commercially license Qt. The updated agreement (version 4.2.3) states: "Permitted Software" shall mean any (i) open source software (excluding Open Source Qt) that is a) generally

Re: [Interest] Qt Creator licensing for companies with Qt Commercial developers

conjunction with commercial license? Could you please let me know in this regard? Thanks and Regards, Ramakanth On Mon, 11 May, 2020, 18:01 Tuukka Turunen, mailto:tuukka.turu...@qt.io>> wrote: Hi, We have now clarified the license agreement to allow use of independent open-source it

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?!

Hi, Apologies for not sending the mail also to the interest mailing list. This is nothing new, as this was announced in already February 2020. Otherwise Qt continues to be available for open-source users, but the long-term support releases of Qt will be available only for the commercial license

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?!

Qt 5.6). Yours, Tuukka From: Michael Jackson Date: Thursday, 7. January 2021 at 17.01 To: Tuukka Turunen , interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?! Dear Tuukka, As an open source developer who has used Qt since 2009, I am still a bit

Re: [Interest] Qt 5.15 pull out of open source?!

release dates. In essence the situation for open-source users is just like it was for everyone before introducing the long-term supported releases (with Qt 5.6). Yours, Tuukka From: Michael Jackson Date: Thursday, 7. January 2021 at 17.01 To: Tuukka Turunen , interest@qt-project.org

Re: [Interest] download.qt.io is down

Hi, Update on the status. The downtime is caused by severe disk system failure at our cloud service provider. The service provider has notified us that they will not be able to repair the disk systems during today. Two important servers related to open-source package delivery are affected (dow

Re: [Interest] download.qt.io is down

Lähettäjä: Mark Long Lähetetty: tiistaina, tammikuuta 19, 2021 9:58 ip. Vastaanottaja: Tuukka Turunen Kopio: Jani Heikkinen; developm...@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org; Interests Qt Aihe: Re: [Interest] download.qt.io is down It seems that the only mirror list I can find online is

Re: [Interest] [Releasing] download.qt.io is down

Hi, Yes, this is correct. Yours, Tuukka From: Sze Howe Koh Date: Wednesday, 20. January 2021 at 0.10 To: Tuukka Turunen Cc: Mark Long , developm...@qt-project.org , Interests Qt , releas...@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Releasing] [Interest] download.qt.io is down On Wed

Re: [Interest] [Development] [Releasing] download.qt.io is down

: Friday, 22. January 2021 at 11.32 To: Nils Jeisecke , Tuukka Turunen , Qt Project Development Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] [Interest] download.qt.io is down On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:38 AM Nils Jeisecke via Development wrote: > > Hi there, > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 7:59 AM Tu

Re: [Interest] Qt for Device Creation installer

Hi, Please contact support helpdesk, they can assist you in installation issues. Yours, Tuukka > -Original Message- > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Nuno Santos > Sent: perjantaina 3. helmikuuta 2017 13.34 > To: inte

Re: [Interest] [Development] Testing help needed

Hi, There were quite many people who expressed interest a few months ago to help in making the releases, so hopefully we get a lot of suggestions to better engage with the whole community for testing the releases. Quite many are testing new Qt versions with their applications and reporting is

Re: [Interest] Using Widgets for new projects

Hi, If you make a desktop application widgets are often a solid choice – especially if you want the application to look like other apps in that OS and not create your own style for the app. Qt Creator, for example, is an application that uses widgets extensively. You may want to check out our

Re: [Interest] News about Qt on QNX ?

Hi Julien, Qt 5.9 LTS (and later versions) support QNX 7.0 (http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/supported-platforms.html). You are right that the HTML5 engine offering on QNX is somewhat complicated as Qt WebEngine does not work on it due to lacking Chromium port for QNX. According to QNX this is something

Re: [Interest] Future of Qt3d

Hi Christian, KDAB is a valuable contributor to the Qt project. The biggest one, if not counting The Qt Company. According to Qt project statistics, KDAB’s contributions are about 15% or all commits to Qt: http://www.macieira.org/~thiago/qt-stats/current/qt-all.employer.relative.png We all o

Re: [Interest] strip: Customise Qt intaller, remove *.qt.io

Hi, I have asked a couple of times Australian mirroring provides to mirror Qt, but without response. Similar approach has been successful in many other countries and we have gotten new mirrors for Qt. Lately I have not been pushing in Australia, but this is a task anyone can do. To get a mirro

Re: [Interest] Qt for AR

Hi, I fully agree that marker based AR is not the proper way to do tracking. With a mobile phone, best is if you can leverage camera for "natural feature tracking" and aid the accuracy via sensor fusion. Depending upon the application / use case you may be able to use known objects as markers

[Interest] Code contributions via bug reports and forum posts

Hi, Contribution of source code is now allowed via Qt systems such as bug reports and forums. Traditionally all source code contributions to the Qt Project are governed via Contribution License Agreement (CLA), except possibility given to the commercial license holders to provide bug fixes and

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Hi, Most of the macOS users are quite quick to take on new OS versions and this is true also for adoption of macOS versions with the new numbering scheme. Apple hardware is also rather good in keeping support for new OS versions and at least between versions 10.15 and 11 there does not seem to

Re: [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant...

Hi, One clarification: we are not talking about stopping support for macOS 10.15 in the already released version of Qt. It continues to be supported target with Qt 5.15 LTS and Qt 6.2 LTS as well as Qt 6.4. Of course within reasonable limits as Apple itself has already stopped supporting it. T

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Hi, This mailing list thread is actually already part of the discussion. I am sure the relevant stakeholders will read though the mails. One important thing: the question is whether or not the _latest_ Qt version supports 3 or 4 generations of macOS – because we already support the older macOS

Re: [Interest] [Development] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

-source applications. You can learn more about Qt Insight at https://www.qt.io/product/insight Yours, Tuukka Lähettäjä: Cristian Adam Lähetetty: maanantaina, joulukuuta 19, 2022 5:58 ip. Vastaanottaja: Michael Jackson ; Tuukka Turunen ; Macieira, Thiago

Re: [Interest] on bumping the minimum Android API level to Android 8.0 API 26

Hi, “Supported” is a bit of a loaded term that can have at least the following meaning, depending upon how it is looked at: 1. When something technically works, it is “supported” to some extent 2. When something is tested in CI and release testing, some could consider calling that “suppor

Re: [Interest] Yocto is application or device creation license???

Hi, The meta-qt6 layer is available at: https://code.qt.io/cgit/yocto/meta-qt6.git/tree/ It works for both commercial as well as open-source Qt as described at: https://code.qt.io/cgit/yocto/meta-qt6.git/tree/README.md Your email mentions MCU, so in case you are looking to use Qt for MCUs it i