Re: Multi-tiered maps

2003-03-14 Thread Mike Dustan
Hi Rich: Subject: Re: Multi-tiered maps, feature requests From: Richard E. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 13 Mar 2003 14:14:06 EST Mike: Thanks for the comments. --- Mike Dunstan wrote: I'd like to see the ability to export a map and a snapshot of the latest status of everything on it in a

Re: Multi-tiered maps

2003-03-14 Thread Jakob Peterhänsel
Hi.. On fredag, mar 14, 2003, at 19:27 Europe/Copenhagen, Mike Dustan wrote: This is pretty much the way that the Map Status probe works now. The sub-map does the work to poll all the devices, and only sends summary information (in the form of updates to the state) to the device on the top-level

InterMapper(R) 4.0.3 Available

2003-03-14 Thread Richard E. Brown
Folks: InterMapper 4.0.3 is now available. Two important bugs have been fixed recently. - Windows users could see crashes when a page was sent via a modem (fixed in 4.0.3) - There was a bug in notification schedules: anyone who had used InterMapper Remote/Console 4.0 or 4.0.1 should

Feature request: eliminate redundant polling via a global devicelist

2003-03-14 Thread Doug Weathers
Hi, I tend to put the same device on several different maps. For example, I have a big map with all my devices on it. Then I have smaller maps that show specific subsets of my devices, such as my WAN, my servers, etc. The problem with InterMapper's current design is that a device is polled

Re: Sub-map questions

2003-03-14 Thread Richard E. Brown
Folks: --- Rich Brown wrote: - Matt and Steve suggested that a top-level icon should be blue if everything on its sub-map has been acknowledged. Do you agree? Is there some other representation that would be better? --- end of quote --- --- and then Steve Campbell wrote: Did I say that? ;-)

Re: Multi-tiered maps

2003-03-14 Thread Doug Weathers
Mike said: I realise that, but what I'm suggesting is a file-based transfer, so we don't have to open ports between otherwise secure network tiers. OK, how about this: The IM server in an outgoing-traffic-only zone is monitoring local devices with a probe. The probe has notifications set for

More feature requests: more automation

2003-03-14 Thread Doug Weathers
Hi, it's me again. My brain won't shut up this evening :) I am currently monitoring 327 devices with InterMapper, with a fairly dynamic network. I'm spending a lot of time modifying maps, and I want more automation. Specifically: 1) Automatic topology detection. This would be HUGELY