Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-05-24 Thread Tex Clayton
On May 24, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Hans Heger wrote: I have contacted other users and I am not standing alone in de idea that the new interface is a step backwards. It works more slowly because the users have to take more steps to change something. Please give us detailed feedback describing

Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-05-24 Thread Hans Heger
| | | | Subject| |Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-05-24 Thread Levinson, Don A.
. -Original Message- From: InterMapper-Talk@list.dartware.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tex Clayton Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:36 AM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder On May 24, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Hans Heger wrote: I

Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-05-22 Thread Jon Myers
Are the results in for this? It would be interesting to see what features people wanted... And if available, an idea on what features Dartware plans on implementing for the next few releases... List archives:

Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-12 Thread Jakob Peterhänsel
On 12/04/2006, at 2:16, Myers, Jon W wrote: I dont understand.. whats this term restart you refer to? =) Ahh.. sorry.. my fault - that was an internal slang statement from this WinSlow environment.. :-) I should have said save device status' between all those funky InterMapper upgrades

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-11 Thread Jon Myers
That feature survey thing doesnt reflect that if I spend $50 of the 100 to go twards SQL, then theoretically things like No redundant polling cost would go down quite a bit. Same with the MAC address bit... and some other high cost things. Of course, I can't imagine how bad the internal coding

Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-11 Thread Jakob Peterhänsel
To be honest, My custom request was: Preserve Device uptime/outages between restarts. Jakob Peterhänsel Tell me why, don't we try, not to break our hearts and make it so hard for our selfs P.S.B. 1987 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: Marook Phone: +45 22684961 On

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-11 Thread Myers, Jon W
on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 4/11/2006 6:37 PM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder I second that. At 12:16 AM +0200 4/12/06, Jakob Peterhänsel wrote: To be honest, My custom request was: Preserve Device uptime/outages between restarts

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-10 Thread Quezada, Pedro
Richard: I think the below will launch intermapper to another level... SQL Database: Write data to an SQL database for later analysis Cost: 15 Report Writing: Generate ad-hoc and scheduled (daily, weekly, etc.) reports from data collected in the SQL database. Cost: 15 -Original

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-10 Thread Mike Bramm
: Monday, April 10, 2006 12:13 PM To: InterMapper Discussion Subject: RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder Richard: I think the below will launch intermapper to another level... SQL Database: Write data to an SQL database for later analysis Cost: 15 Report Writing: Generate ad-hoc

RE: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder

2006-04-10 Thread Richard E. Brown
Pedro, Mike: It looks as if the survey application got stuck (we found the database was locked). If you went to fill out the survey, and found that you couldn't go past the first page, please try it again - it's OK now... http://intermapper.com/surveys/survey2526/ Thanks! Rich Brown