Hello Internals,
there are several bug reports related to open_basedir and non-existant
files/directories.[1] uramihsayibok's comment on bug #53041 sheds some
light on the issue. A few weeks ago I had a closer look at it, and it
seems that using expand_filepath_with_mode() instead of
Hi all,
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 16/05/2015 20:15, Levi Morrison wrote:
The difference is that as time goes on and I've written code for PHP 7
I was hit by this
On 19/05/2015 00:07, Christoph Becker wrote:
What happens if the soft limit is exhausted, but the GC can free only a
little memory? That might trigger the GC shortly afterwards again and
again.
The usual way to stop this sort of flapping is to set the point at
which the alarm gets reset to be
On 19 May 2015 at 14:28, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan Ackroyd wrote on 19/05/2015 14:08:
* When gc_collect_cycles is called (and potentially other functions),
at the end of that function check whether the amount of memory being
used is less than reset level for each
Dan Ackroyd wrote on 19/05/2015 14:08:
* When gc_collect_cycles is called (and potentially other functions),
at the end of that function check whether the amount of memory being
used is less than reset level for each trigger. If so reduce the
current memory limit to the lowest trigger level.
Hi internals!
For PHP 7 we soft-reserved a number of class names [1] like numeric, so
that we have the ability to introduce them as typehints in a 7.x release.
Soft here means that we only document these names as being reserved and
don't throw an error when they're used.
I'd like to add void to
+1
On 19 May 2015 at 17:16, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why
should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve
typename RFC were unanimous.
Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to already
Hi all!
I’ve registered on the wiki with username trowski and would like to request
write access so I can create an RFC for the PR at
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1284
Thanks!
Aaron Piotrowski
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
For PHP 7 we soft-reserved a number of class names [1] like numeric, so
that we have the ability to introduce them as typehints in a 7.x release.
Soft here means that we only document these names as being
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why
should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve
typename RFC were unanimous.
Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why
should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve
typename RFC were unanimous.
Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to
I strongly disagree with this action. These types required an RFC; why
should this be different? Also note that neither of the reserve
typename RFC were unanimous.
Furthermore, we are past the RFC stage. We are *supposed to already
have an alpha* by now and we are proposing new changes?. Please
On 19 May 2015 17:21:58 BST, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
On a related note it is unclear what BC breaks are exactly allowed in
minor releases. Adding new reserved types is a BC break, but it was
done in PHP 5.4 with `callable`. We should solidify what we do and do
not allow in minor
Le Tue, 19 May 2015 17:28:34 +0200, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com a
écrit:
Hi internals!
For PHP 7 we soft-reserved a number of class names [1] like numeric, so
that we have the ability to introduce them as typehints in a 7.x release.
Soft here means that we only document these names as
15 matches
Mail list logo
