Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO ODBC #42765 uninitialized length bug patch

PDO ODBC #42765 uninitialized length bug patch https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=42765 Any takers? Would we be able to get this patch committed? It's a pretty straight forward fix. Thanks, -- Anish On 11/02/2016 10:32, Anish Mistry wrote: > Would a developer be able look at the patch in this

[PHP-DEV] Error of codes on page https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading

Hi, The codes that show usage of smart_string: - smart_str str = {0}; - smart_str_appendl(str, " ", sizeof(" ") - 1); - smart_str_0(str); - RETURN_STRINGL(implstr.c, implstr.len, 0); + smart_string str = {0}; + smart_string_appendl(str, " ", sizeof(" ") - 1); + smart_string_0(str); +

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Vote] Doxygen

On 17/6/17 5:53 pm, Fleshgrinder wrote: Hi! I started voting on the Doxygen RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/doxygen Did I miss seeing when the vote ends? Chris -- http://twitter.com/ghrd -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit:

[PHP-DEV] NEUTRAL Benchmark Results for PHP Master 2017-06-20

Results for project PHP master, build date 2017-06-20 08:30:24-07:00 commit: c18ba68 previous commit:e0403eb revision date: 2017-06-20 10:11:41-04:00 environment:Haswell-EP cpu:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2, LLC 45 MB

Re: [PHP-DEV] Missing commits in 7.0 branch

Hi! > From the history it looks like you didn't push the 7.0 branch. > > See also the commit mail which only references 7.1 and master. > http://news.php.net/php.cvs/96748 Ok, I've re-added them to 7.0 and pushed it. Anatol, could you also add these to the release branch so that 7.0 would be

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions

On 19 June 2017 21:22:53 BST, Rasmus Schultz wrote: >So what's on the table is a syntax-improved but feature-crippled >variant of >closures, not an all-round replacement? I haven't the time right now to dig out my summary from the mail archives, but this is one of the

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Add support for stream-wrapped URLs inopcode cache

Hi, Le 20/06/2017 à 18:35, 江湖大虾仁 a écrit : Hi François, Good work, but I'm not sure if I missed something because I didn't find any discuss relating to this RFC in my mail box, as well as the PR on GitHub. I have a question about the detail of `cache_key`: Discussion :

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions

> I just think your example is an exaggeration to what happens in practice. I think it's an example of what happens with any inconsistent feature in any language. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Markus Fischer wrote: > Hello Rasmus, > > On 19.06.17 22:22, Rasmus Schultz

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Add support for stream-wrapped URLs inopcode cache

Hi François, Good work, but I'm not sure if I missed something because I didn't find any discuss relating to this RFC in my mail box, as well as the PR on GitHub. I have a question about the detail of `cache_key`: > If the method is not defined, every path associated to this wrapper are >

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions

Well, the Ruby/Rust syntax would serve us well here too: $things->forEach(|$v| {     foo($v);     bar($v); }); On 19 Jun, 2017, at 09:43 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote: I actually like this syntax, but what would it look like for multi-statement closures? A nested set of curly

Re: [PHP-DEV] Missing commits in 7.0 branch

On Mo, 2017-06-19 at 17:58 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > I've discovered something weird in 7.0 branch. There are two commits > of > a bugfix - > https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/d1d002fc4dd25a80e20163b18880f40 > a445276e7 > and >

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Allow loading extensions by name

I'll double check later today, it might be that this comes in from the startup phase and we can't do zend_error() for some reason. Either way I'll get it merged soonish. Thanks. -Sara On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:53 AM, François Laupretre wrote: > Hi Sara, > > Le 19/06/2017 à

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Allow loading extensions by name

Hi Sara, Le 19/06/2017 à 23:33, Sara Golemon a écrit : I was about to merge this, but ran into some issues (mostly minor). Could you at least address the fwrite(stderr, ...) item (and preferably clean up the style nits while you're at it)? Oh, and I forgot to include it in the CR, but there

Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC]Discuss] Syntax for Arrow Functions

Hello Rasmus, On 19.06.17 22:22, Rasmus Schultz wrote: If I have to factor back and forth between new and old syntax every time a closure changes from one to multiple or back to one statement, then, frankly, what's the point? I think I would just keep using the old syntax, then - for