> On 4 Sep 2016, at 6:48 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/16 22:53, Rowan Collins wrote:
>> I guess we could have a philosophical debate about what it means for
>> something to be "the standard" rather than "a standard", and whether
>> PEAR was "more official" than
> On 19 Jun 2016, at 7:57 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
>
> I am well familiar with this approach, and it does not scale - not
> only would you be aggressively loading every installed view-helper
> anytime you render a view, you would even be loading them when you're
> *not*
On 14 May 2015, at 9:27 pm, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Arvids,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Arvids Godjuks arvids.godj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello, I have read through your blog post, and I agreed on the issue
earlier, nut I have a question that bugs me for a while:
On 18 Mar 2015, at 3:44 pm, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015 11:26 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
I didn't have my time to spent for the patch. So I don't verify
On 16 Mar 2015, at 11:16 pm, Pavel Kouřil pajou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com wrote:
On 16 March 2015 at 11:49, Pavel Kouřil pajou...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, think about it for a while - when some setting that changes
how
On 14 Mar 2015, at 6:41 am, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 13/03/15 18:53, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
By considering PHP's nature, having a dual mode is a WTF. I can see myself
asking multiple times a day is this file strict or not? to trace
potential bugs or type
On 17 Mar 2015, at 1:33 am, Thomas Punt tp...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hey David,
A library written in weak or strict mode will have no bearing on its public
API.
Strictly speaking (pun intended), this is not true. A library can easily
expose a
facade that enforces a user of that library
On 10 Feb 2015, at 9:29 am, Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net wrote:
Hi,
the voting on the removals in PHP7 in hereby finished. The results are
item yes:no
sapi/aolserver 32:0
sapi/apache32:0
sapi/apache_hooks 31:0
sapi/apache2filter
On 3 Feb 2015, at 3:49 am, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 02/02/2015 08:38 AM, François Laupretre wrote:
Hi,
Opening the vote for :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/streams-is-cacheable
This RFC proposes a generic way for opcode caches to decide if a given URI
is cacheable or
On 28 Jan 2015, at 8:58 pm, Ralf Lang l...@b1-systems.de wrote:
On 28.01.2015 10:46, Tony Marston wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote in message news:54c75d9e.8090...@php.net...
Am 27.01.2015 um 10:00 schrieb Lester Caine:
composer has not even managed to get added to some distributions yet
Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-webmas...@lists.php.net
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Jan 2015, at 4:45 am, Thomas Hruska thru...@cubiclesoft.com wrote:
On 12/28/2014 4:47 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 12/7/2014 10:52 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
On 11/29/2014 6:27 AM,
On 4 Jan 2015, at 12:34 pm, Thomas Hruska thru...@cubiclesoft.com wrote:
On 1/3/2015 4:56 PM, David Muir wrote:
Shouldn't this be directed to the webmaster mailing list?
php-webmas...@lists.php.net
See below. They said that they don't have access to that server. :)
Ah, missed
On 21 Dec 2014, at 10:32 am, Kevin Israel pleasest...@live.com wrote:
On 12/20/2014 05:16 PM, Paul Dragoonis wrote:
It's too big of a BC change firstly.
Secondly it has no language benefit or developer benefit.
Are you sure? Autoloading schemes such as PSR-4 derive pathnames from
Not a voter, but I don't really see the usefulness of this in core either.
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Nov 2014, at 11:45 am, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
My -1 is pretty much the same as Levi's:
On 19 November 2014 13:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
- The RFC does not
On 29/10/2014, at 12:43 AM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:27 PM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
On 2014-10-26, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Weinand wrote:
On 21/07/2014, at 10:04 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I want to finish and close this issue.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Also, Deprecating crypt() without first discussing it (and having an
RFC to vote on) is not
On 09/10/13 07:39, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Gordon Oheim g...@php.net wrote:
Since the feedback so far was few but positive, I'll advance the RFC to
the next stage. Apart from this, any feedback is still welcome.
Thanks and Regards, Gordon
For the lazy folks,
On 23/08/2013, at 11:24 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
We need better function as basic feature of PHP. unique_hash() or
hash_unique() might be good. UUID works and is much better but generating
unique hash
On 23/04/13 07:35, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ben Ramsey ram...@php.net wrote:
I've just submitted the following pull request for updates to the
array_column() function:
https://github.com/php/php-**src/pull/331https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/331
I asked about
On 23/04/13 14:50, David Muir wrote:
On 23/04/13 07:35, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ben Ramsey ram...@php.net wrote:
I've just submitted the following pull request for updates to the
array_column() function:
https://github.com/php/php-**src/pull/331https
On 09/04/13 10:29, Joe Watkins wrote:
On 04/08/2013 09:07 PM, Madara Uchiha wrote:
I'm with Morrison, I see no actual use for this.
It's cool, but what would you use it for?
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Levi Morrison
morrison.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I see little value in having a function
On 06/04/2013, at 1:40 AM, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
why not make struct almost like a class except
that $this is a copy (on write) - modifying and returning $this would
be a new instance of that struct/class. That would give you
On 24/03/13 09:26, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/23/2013 03:01 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
realpath the document root(which is a symlink to the actual release
directory) from your index.php/bootstrap file and use that as a base
path for making absolute paths everywhere?
that way the requests
On 18/03/2013, at 6:07 PM, Matīss Roberts Treinis mrtrei...@gmail.com wrote:
Not only that. This potentially might break compatibility with many
software products already out there. Also, this might lead to many
misunderstandings and, in fact, ambiguous code. Consider the sample.
$name =
When do you upgrade to a new release of php e.g. 5.3 - 5.4
- As soon as released
- wait for the x.1 release
- Once our OpCode cache supports it
- When previous version hits EOL
- When a new feature warrants the upgrade
- When my Framework (Zend/Symfony/cake) or Software (Wordpress,
On 01/03/2013, at 7:00 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core, I've
come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and Suhosin into
core at the same time.
1. It has integration issues with ZO+
On 01/03/2013, at 9:22 AM, Jan Ehrhardt php...@ehrhardt.nl wrote:
Raymond Irving in php.internals (Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:56:11 -0500):
I'm very sure users will not complain if 5.5 is delayed for a few months.
Most websites will not be installing 5.5 immediately after it has been
released.
On 21/02/2013, at 6:12 AM, Lazare Inepologlou linep...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/20 Sanford Whiteman swhitemanlistens-softw...@cypressintegrated.com
It still looks like some random characters bashed together by a monkey
with a keyboard.
+1, I am a fiend for ternary expressions and crazy
On 20/02/2013, at 10:47 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:26:26AM -0800, Sara Golemon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
Opening RFC to allow trailing comma in function call argument lists
We still don't have a way to auto load non class entities. Other than that,
PSR-0 does solve the majority of autoload use cases.
Cheers,
David
Sent from my iPhone
On 04/02/2013, at 5:18 PM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
On 02/03/2013 08:51 PM, Matt Wilson wrote:
Hello all.
On 16/01/13 08:22, Thomas Bley wrote:
Hello,
I created a small ticket to propose a shorter syntax for htmlspecialchars:
old:
?= htmlspecialchars($str, ENT_QUOTES) ?
new:
?+ $str ?
or:
?~ $str ?
any comments, pros and cons?
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62574
Best regards,
Thomas
The
On 21/12/12 10:34, Christopher Jones wrote:
On 12/20/2012 08:31 AM, Larry Garfield wrote:
On 12/19/12 10:30 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
On 12/19/2012 03:18 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
You could likely simplify the code even further using an infinite
iterator:
On 11/12/12 06:59, Herman Radtke wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Ángel González keis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/12/12 16:18, Nikita Nefedov wrote:
So there had been at least two or three messages (subjects) about
DateTime object and everytime there was this problem - people tend to
On 30/11/12 05:25, Ángel González wrote:
On 29/11/12 18:17, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
Just pointing this out: that's NOT what this RFC recommends, and is
NOT what's being voted on. This RFC is talking about ONLY adding
E_DEPRECATED to core. And the way it's proposed to be done, the
moves-to-PECL
On 29/11/12 05:09, Ángel González wrote:
I see it as simple to show E_DEPRECATED but not when installed from PECL.
1) Add a
int mysql_extension_triggers_deprecated_warning = 1;
And use it as a conditional for triggering the warning.
2) Copy the extension code to PECL
3) Add these changes in
,
David
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 07:00 AM, David Muir wrote:
On 29/11/12 05:09, Ángel González wrote:
I see it as simple to show E_DEPRECATED but not when installed from
PECL.
1) Add a
int mysql_extension_triggers_deprecated_warning = 1;
And use it as a conditional for triggering
On 29/11/12 07:33, Kris Craig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.comwrote:
Patrick,
Sorry, but removing the E_DEPRECATED notice when moved to PECL is not
part of the proposed RFC and should certainly not happen.
The proposal doesn't actually propose
On 20/11/12 21:22, Lester Caine wrote:
Ulf Wendel wrote:
1. Add this link to the RFC?:
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/mysql/Converting+to+MySQLi
As the author I cannot recommend materials created in 2006 and not
updated since then for inclusion into a RFC.
At the end of the day this is
On 21/11/12 15:47, Adam Harvey wrote:
On 19 November 2012 20:44, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
My intention at this stage is to call a vote next Monday: it feels
like the discussion has mostly died down now (which isn't to say I
think we're at a consensus necessarily — it just
On 21/11/12 16:08, Adam Harvey wrote:
On 21 November 2012 13:03, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/11/12 15:47, Adam Harvey wrote:
2. If we decide not to generate E_DEPRECATED notices in PHP 5.5, what
should the next course of action be:
(a) Enhance the manual text to make
On 14/11/12 03:17, Adam Harvey wrote:
On 14 November 2012 00:07, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
There's one important thing that I think you all are missing here. You keep
bringing up that we should just use the normal deprecation process. The
problem is that the deprecation
On 29/10/12 03:02, Clint Priest wrote:
So... to be explicit here, you think in this situation:
class a {
public $b {
set($x) { $this-b = $x; }
}
}
$o = new a();
if(!isset($o-b)) {
/* delete files */
}
echo (int)isset($o-b); /* This should return false and not emit any
sort of
On 19/10/12 07:41, David Strauss wrote:
The full RFC, including initial patches, is here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/socketactivation
In short, this allows spawning a PHP-FPM pool on-demand with systemd
initializing the main socket.
Upstart support would be good to have too.
I take it that
On 16/10/12 22:34, Clint Priest wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 6:06 AM
To: Clint Priest
Cc: Nikita Popov (nikita@gmail.com); internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property
On 16/10/12 13:37, Clint Priest wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Clint Priestcpri...@zerocue.com wrote:
Because fundamentally interfaces are designed to explain a way of
communicating and properties are symmetrical and non-
observable.
The implementing class cannot know when a
On 16/10/12 14:55, Jazzer Dane wrote:
I'm going to agree with David here. It is most sensible to either
allow properties AND accessors in interfaces, or don't allow either of
them. __get/__set is a different subject that I'd rather not dig into
while discussing this RFC.
I tossed in the
On 09/10/12 19:20, Jazzer Dane wrote:
- If we ever get return type hinting/checks then we needn't consider how
the syntax has to look From what I know, this isn't planned for PHP 5.5
and any proposals for it have been largely ignored. Return type hinting
won't help when setting either, although
On 20/09/12 07:48, Michael Shadle wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Pádraic Brady padraic.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
See the link near the bottom of the RFC - even htmlspecialchars() has
unusual behaviour that's potentially insecure. I have no objections to
there being
On 15/09/2012, at 8:38 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Remi Collet wrote:
Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the
shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ...
Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7;)
(I have backports for f17)
18 is
On 26/08/2012, at 4:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
2012.08.25. 19:50, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com ezt írta:
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the
On 20/07/12 09:38, Andrew Faulds wrote:
I'm curious, how do I make my objects have scalar passing semantics, then?
On Jul 20, 2012 12:35 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
How about this?
class String {
protected $string='';
public function __construct($string){
On 19/07/12 04:49, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 07/18/2012 01:02 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
See the other answers, clear APIs, no more argument mess, cleanness.
Cleanness has nothing to do with pseudo-objects.You
Took the words from my mouth. Removing legacy support is a terrible idea
for PHP6. It makes it impossible to write forwards compatible code that
currently runs in PHP5. Even having it optional is a bad idea IMO since
it will fragment PHP hosting. Some will be able to run PHP6 only (no
legacy),
On 14/07/12 01:33, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
Hey all,
I know that 6.0 was originally supposed to be the unicode conversion of the
engine. However it appears that all progress on that has stopped for quite
some time.
So, I was curious if we could start a conversation around what 6.0 would
look
What about replacing the existing array with array_slice?
David
On 12/07/2012, at 9:43 PM, Jille Timmermans ji...@quis.cx wrote:
Hello,
array_shift() currently reindexes the array after shifting one element. The
reindexing has quite some impact on it's performance. I would like to suggest
On 13/07/12 01:04, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
On 2012-07-12, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
--e89a8f235453d7a80104c4975c55
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.comwrote:
One thing to keep in mind when doing this is to think about consistency.
I think
I'd assume that array_map() only works with arrays, while list comprehension
should work with anything traversable.
David
On 28/06/2012, at 10:43 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Whats the difference to the (already existing) function array_map() (except
the syntax and
On 29/06/12 14:06, minwei zhou wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
Python and several other languages include support for list
comprehensions and generator expressions and I'd like to see something
why PHP should going to like other
On 28/06/12 23:45, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
2012/6/28 David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com
I'd assume that array_map() only works with arrays, while list
comprehension should work with anything traversable.
That sounds more like a bug (better: Missing feature) in array_map()
and less
Coming from a pleb, my only concern is the name if the class is in the
global scope. A BreakIterator to me sounds like something related to
breaking out of a looping structure, and not something used for
iterating over various language structure boundaries.
If it's in a ICU namespace, then it's
On 14/04/12 03:41, Kris Craig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:37 PM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com
mailto:davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/04/12 15:13, Kris Craig wrote:
Again, the controller should NOT be a .phpp file. Likewise,
your model
should NOT be hooking
On 15/04/12 16:29, Kris Craig wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, John LeSueur john.lesu...@gmail.comwrote:
The second thing that still needs nailing down as far as implementation is
how to determine parsing mode. If it has to be specified at include time,
then we're putting the burden
Wohoo!!! Congrats everyone!
Bye bye magic quotes!
David
ps. Now to get my host to upgrade to 5.3 grumble grumble!
On 02/03/12 10:29, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hello!
The PHP Development Team would like to announce the immediate
availability of PHP 5.4.0. This release is a major leap
I noticed that too.
The migration guide is also missing a lot of stuff.
A quick overview:
http://au.php.net/manual/en/migration54.changes.php:
content missing
http://au.php.net/manual/en/migration54.new-features.php:
missing a lot of new features listed elsewhere
, at 4:18 PM, David Muir wrote:
I noticed that too.
The migration guide is also missing a lot of stuff.
A quick overview:
http://au.php.net/manual/en/migration54.changes.php:
content missing
http://au.php.net/manual/en/migration54.new-features.php:
missing a lot of new features listed
I can't comment on the internal implementation, but I like the use of
the casting syntax. It's not as pretty, but make the intent clear, and
there's not BC issues with class names.
David
On 02/03/12 14:48, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
Hey all,
I know given all the discussion about this topic
On 12/21/2011 03:37 AM, jpauli wrote:
I guess constant array would mean that all the variables inside the array
dimensions should not change.
Just saying that, is a nonsense.
If a constant could be an array, then that array could not contain
variables, if not it wouldn't be constant any more
On 15/12/11 21:17, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
I believe he's referring to sys/time.h, but this introduces
portability issues. If it were just unix, that would be one thing.
But maintaining this and a Windows
On 24/11/11 06:25, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
The only case where the 5.4 branch works differently as before if you
reference a string type(int, float, etc. won't trigger this) variable
using an associative index and you expect it that to be undefined
variable even though that the
On 24/11/11 11:42, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
If you want this fix to be palatable, we'll need a new language
construct that effectively runs a series of is_array array_key_exists
with a final !== null check.
I'm not sure RC time is a good place for introducing new language
constructs.
On 24/11/11 12:44, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:38 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com
mailto:davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, the changes introduced in 5.4 will result in the
following:
?php
$string = 'foo';
$array = array
Surprised to say that I agree on just about everything you mentioned. I
would however love to see a useful autoloader included in core. I have
only one comment below.
4. The RFC should avoid implementing any pattern or style that may
make future feature addition difficult or pose risks towards
On 11/11/2011 01:31 PM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Thanks immensely for your input.
Without such action, it's extremely hard to improve the RFC. =)
Awesome action from your side.
I'll place my comments inline.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Anthony Ferrara
On 08/26/2011 04:12 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2011/8/24 David Soria Parra d...@php.net:
Hi Internals,,
after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be explained
in more detail, let me know.
I won't
On 22/08/11 17:44, Lester Caine wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Just for the record ... the libreoffice clone I started 9 hours ago is
still going strong, and I'm estimating that it will finish some time
tomorrow afternoon, another 20 hours or so. A single huge repo is going
to take time to
, but
Thunderbird picks up your address instead of internals.
David
On 23/08/11 09:52, Pierre Joye wrote:
then the gain will be zero. By the way, no need to go private to reply :)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:29 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
That still requires the extension. I
On 08/19/2011 10:54 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Arpad Ray array...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Arpad Ray array...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Ferenc
On 08/08/11 07:37, Richard Riley wrote:
David Soria Parra d...@php.net writes:
On 2011-08-07, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
As somebody that have seen reasonably big project switch from SVN to git
and worked quite actively with git since then, I think describing my
On 09/08/11 01:07, Lester Caine wrote:
David Muir wrote:
John Szakmeister, who is a Subversion developer himself, has a good
comparison of svn, hg, bzr and git:
http://www.szakmeister.net/blog/2011/feb/17/choosing-new-version-control-system/
Long story short, his company went with git
On 30/06/11 11:13, Matt Pelmear wrote:
Seems odd to me that is_subclass_of returns true for interfaces... I never
realized that before.
Personally I would prefer a separate method to check for interfaces, since
they aren't really classes (at least in my head), but I suppose that would
break
On 30/06/11 15:01, Matt Pelmear wrote:
Not like class_implements(), since that requires processing the returned
array... Rather something that would function similarly to is_subclass_of()
(in that it returns a bool, not an array), but for interfaces.
I seem to run into a need for that on a
personally I find that weird, and unintuitive, but changin that in a major
or minor version could be changed if we chose to.
I think it's a behaviour that could be changed in some step like from
5.3 to 5.4 or so. Personally I don't think it would influence existing
implementations much (who
On 21/06/11 07:41, Arpad Ray wrote:
I also think once that functionality is there the next request will be
get_registered_shutdown_functions()
or something along the lines.
I don't see of what use that could be.
Completeness? Has that stupid shutdown func been registered?
Fair enough,
On 07/06/11 15:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.06.2011 04:42, schrieb Martin Scotta:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 06.06.2011 23:40, schrieb Martin Scotta:
It'd be very nice if some extension could be enabled just by dropping the
extension
On 07/06/11 18:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.06.2011 11:32, schrieb David Muir:
On 07/06/11 15:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.06.2011 04:42, schrieb Martin Scotta:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 06.06.2011 23:40, schrieb Martin Scotta
On 06/06/11 17:48, Tom Samplonius wrote:
Currently - A lot of ISP's are 'stuck' with PHP5.2 or earlier simply
I don't know if this is really the case. I work in this industry, and most
of the small to mid hosting company's use cPanel or Plesk, and both include
PHP 5.3. I've personally
On 06/06/11 07:27, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
On 2011-06-05, Pierre Joyepierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Philip Olsonphi...@roshambo.org
wrote:
I'd to say that I'm very happy to finally see such discussions
happening, let sort the base (99% is done by our existing
On 07/06/11 01:49, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
Currently off the shelf, 5.2.17 is the 'old stable' but for some
windows users
it IS the only available version. Changing the rest of the
infrastructure to
5.2.17 is unsupported. It is announced on php.net. Now, some Windows
users, due to
On 02/06/11 17:23, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for jumping into the thread, but I couldn't help noting that you seem
confused about the distro suggestion. I think Ubuntu was the example, and
there's nothing random at all
On 21/05/11 01:15, Larry Garfield wrote:
Hi all.
I'm working with a fellow developer on an experimental project. There
are some PECL modules that we want to try and use in an open source
project where we cannot guarantee that PECL modules will be available,
since it's intended for
On 26/04/11 09:37, Ben Schmidt wrote:
Back in PHP4 it was the only way to simulate an static call, but
nowadays it really don't make sense at all.
class Foo {
static function toString(Bar $bar) {
return 'Foo::toString($bar)';
}
function toString() {
On 21/04/11 08:56, Arpad Ray wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Hannes Landeholm landeh...@gmail.com wrote:
Some suggested that the ternary if comparison should suppress the notice
automatically. This would break existing code and also be confusing since
people expect a ternary if and
I'm not sure if this is needed when there are already solutions for this.
eg, syslog, error_log, or other userland solutions like Zend_Log,
sfLogger, etc.
Cheers,
David
On 19/04/11 23:44, Michael Morris wrote:
Pardon me for following up my own post, but there is room for a range of
functions
Bottom posted.
On 14/04/11 09:24, Ben Schmidt wrote:
I think these shortcuts could be really useful for array elements, but
for other variables I am really sceptical and I think they would do
more harm than good. Generally I do not really see any reason why a
variable should not be
miss a function which returns the time the script can
keep running for. If that calculate needs to be calculated to implemented to
implement this, why not make the value available to the PHP script?
~Hannes
On 9 March 2011 02:30, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Although it doesn't let
Although it doesn't let you recover from a timeout, you could use
register_shutdown_function to gracefully exit after a fatal error.
register_shutdown_function(function(){
$error = error_get_last();
if($error $error['type'] === E_ERROR){
echo 'PHAIL! Oh noes, something went
On 20/01/11 23:25, Martin Scotta wrote:
and what what happen if the extending class does not call
parent::__construct() ?
__construct is just like any other function, but with semantic added on top
of.
Changing the way it behaves will cause many headaches
---
BTW, Did you noted that self
On 12/12/10 01:47, Stefan Marr wrote:
Hi:
Traits do not provide any special provisioning for handling properties,
especially, there is no language solution for handling colliding property names.
The current solution/idiom for handling state safely in a trait is to use
either abstract set/get
98 matches
Mail list logo