On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me
and Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has
started (again). It
Good stuff everyone. Glad the vote went through.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
My sincerest apologies about all the mess
On 23 Jul 2014, at 14:38, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me and
Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has started
(again). It shall end on 2014-07-30 (next Wednesday, a week’s time) and it
Good afternoon,
My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me and
Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has started
(again). It shall end on 2014-07-30 (next Wednesday, a week’s time) and it
won’t be cancelled this time.
Somewhat unrelated to this vote in particular, but someone mentioned on
IRC that it would be cool to see votes chronologically so I wrote a
short JS snippet that does just that. In case anyone is interested for
archeological purposes:
https://gist.github.com/Seldaek/bc0ae0e2bf1617d71ed7
--
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good afternoon,
My sincerest apologies about all the mess earlier and the delay. Both me
and Zeev are happy enough with the RFC, so the voting for this RFC has
started (again). It shall end on 2014-07-30 (next Wednesday, a
did you consider resetting the vote as the text was changed multiple times
after the voting begun?
It was reset.
S
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the votes to
come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that There'd be a
minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is brought
up on
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the votes
to
come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that There'd be a
minimum of 2
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Sean Coates s...@seancoates.com wrote:
did you consider resetting the vote as the text was changed multiple times
after the voting begun?
It was reset.
S
whoops, sorry.
then I'm really surprised the number of votes already in.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l -
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the
votes
to
On 23/07/14 19:23, Kris Craig wrote:
Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to
avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version
increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote.
Since PHP6 existed then sorry but using it again is just as
On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think
13 matches
Mail list logo
