Le 15/03/2015 20:18, Daniel Lowrey a écrit :
As the discussion period has reached its conclusion I'd like to announce a
two week voting period on the Generator Delegation RFC
Hi,
Only a few people at AFUP discussed this RFC (I suppose it's the kind of
feature not everyone will use), but
Hi Daniel,
In the formal definition, you have:
$throw $e;
... which I assume is a typo?
Damien
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Daniel Lowrey rdlow...@php.net wrote:
Hi folks!
As the discussion period has reached its conclusion I'd like to announce a
two week voting period on the
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Damien Tournoud d...@damz.org wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In the formal definition, you have:
$throw $e;
... which I assume is a typo?
Damien
Woops! Yes, this is a typo. Thanks for the heads-up; fixing now ...
Hi Daniel,
Would you mind clarifying the relationship between the Generator
Delegation RFC and the Generator Return Expressions RFC?
While I really appreciate the Generator Delegation RFC, the Generator
Return Expressions looks both unnecessary and kind of a hack to me. In
evented system based
2015-03-15 21:13 GMT+01:00 Damien Tournoud d...@damz.org:
Hi Daniel,
Would you mind clarifying the relationship between the Generator
Delegation RFC and the Generator Return Expressions RFC?
While I really appreciate the Generator Delegation RFC, the Generator
Return Expressions looks both
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Damien Tournoud d...@damz.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Lowrey rdlow...@php.net wrote:
This is actually a *vastly* inferior solution to language-level support
for generator returns. greenlet/gevent does it this way because these
libraries
Hi folks!
As the discussion period has reached its conclusion I'd like to announce a
two week voting period on the Generator Delegation RFC here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/generator-delegation
Voting ends Sunday, March 29.
I know everyone is busy and your time is valuable; thanks for spending a
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Lowrey rdlow...@php.net wrote:
This is actually a *vastly* inferior solution to language-level support
for generator returns. greenlet/gevent does it this way because these
libraries were created before Python supported generator delegation (and
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Damien Tournoud d...@damz.org wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Would you mind clarifying the relationship between the Generator
Delegation RFC and the Generator Return Expressions RFC?
Sure, thanks for the question. As mentioned in the RFC:
In short: generator delegation
