Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-24 Thread Pascal MARTIN
Le 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov a écrit : https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) Hi, We talked about this RFC with other people at AFUP, and it seems we are on the +1 side. Basically, with strict warnings, one might wonder whether or not his code

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-16 Thread Markus Fischer
Hi Matteo, On 16.03.15 12:43, Matteo Beccati wrote: On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote: In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now know it

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-16 Thread Matteo Beccati
On 16/03/2015 13:28, Markus Fischer wrote: am I correct assuming that your existing test suite was running with E_STRICT excluded from error_reporting ? Of course. Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-16 Thread Matteo Beccati
Hi Nikic, On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote: In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now know it is bad practice, but I bet there's lot of

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-16 Thread Peter Cowburn
On 15 March 2015 at 15:46, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote: Hi internals! To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) Nikita, don't forget to start a new thread with the tag [VOTE] in the

[PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Nikita Popov
Hi internals! To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) Thanks, Nikita

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Markus Fischer
On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote: To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) From the RFC: Signature mismatch during inheritance ... Possible alternative: Convert to E_DEPRECATED, if we intend

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Matteo Beccati
Hi Nikita, On 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote: Hi internals! To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) I know I'm late, but with I just have found the required time to test the branch with

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Nikita Popov
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Markus Fischer mar...@fischer.name wrote: On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote: To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) From the RFC: Signature mismatch

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Pierre Joye
hi Nikita, On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote: Hi internals! To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes... https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote Voting is open for ten days :) I am late on that but I need one clarification about:

Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Reclassify E_STRICT notices

2015-03-15 Thread Dennis Birkholz
Hello Pierre, Am 16.03.2015 um 02:34 schrieb Pierre Joye: Some of the strict standards notices are converted to an error category that is considered more severe. As such error handlers might treat it more severely, resulting in BC breakage. Does it mean that some errors may end on