Le 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov a écrit :
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
Hi,
We talked about this RFC with other people at AFUP, and it seems we are
on the +1 side.
Basically, with strict warnings, one might wonder whether or not his
code
Hi Matteo,
On 16.03.15 12:43, Matteo Beccati wrote:
On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote:
In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method
signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and
hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now know it
On 16/03/2015 13:28, Markus Fischer wrote:
am I correct assuming that your existing test suite was running with
E_STRICT excluded from error_reporting ?
Of course.
Cheers
--
Matteo Beccati
Development Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
Hi Nikic,
On 15/03/2015 19:30, Matteo Beccati wrote:
In PHP4 times it was in fact quite common to change inherited method
signatures to bend them to one's will and/or remove parameters and
hardcode them in the parent constructor call. We now know it is bad
practice, but I bet there's lot of
On 15 March 2015 at 15:46, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
Nikita, don't forget to start a new thread with the tag [VOTE] in the
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
Thanks,
Nikita
On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
From the RFC:
Signature mismatch during inheritance
...
Possible alternative: Convert to E_DEPRECATED, if we intend
Hi Nikita,
On 15/03/2015 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
I know I'm late, but with I just have found the required time to test
the branch with
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Markus Fischer mar...@fischer.name wrote:
On 15.03.15 16:46, Nikita Popov wrote:
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
From the RFC:
Signature mismatch
hi Nikita,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals!
To ensure we have no shortage of new RFC votes...
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reclassify_e_strict#vote
Voting is open for ten days :)
I am late on that but I need one clarification about:
Hello Pierre,
Am 16.03.2015 um 02:34 schrieb Pierre Joye:
Some of the strict standards notices are converted to an error
category that is considered more severe. As such error handlers might
treat it more severely, resulting in BC breakage.
Does it mean that some errors may end on
11 matches
Mail list logo