Until version 5.3.2 this worked fine, starting from version 5.3.3
parent::getFoo() calls __callStatic() instead of __call().
This is a really bad BC change which i thought you decided to accept only
in minor versions change and not patch-level versions change.
Anyway, I would even be
2010/10/24 Giovanni Giacobbi giova...@giacobbi.net
Greetings,
in reference to bug #52713 i'd like to inquire you about this decision
which actually broke my codebase in different parts.
The situation is this one:
class ActiveRecord {
public function __call($method, $args) {
if
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:56:28AM +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Exactly, if Bar::getFoo is not called statically, parent::getFoo() will
not be a static call, it should not get through __callStatic.
That logic sounds good. Unfortunately, things aren't behaving that way:
?php
// Rework of
On 26 October 2010 15:48, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:56:28AM +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Exactly, if Bar::getFoo is not called statically, parent::getFoo() will
not be a static call, it should not get through __callStatic.
That logic
Greetings,
in reference to bug #52713 i'd like to inquire you about this decision which
actually broke my codebase in different parts.
The situation is this one:
class ActiveRecord {
public function __call($method, $args) {
if ($method == getFoo) {
// implement some default
Hi!
class Bar {
// override getFoo() to add some specific behaviour
public function getFoo() {
// do the specific stuff
parent::getFoo();
}
}
I think you meant Bar to extend ActiveRecord? But anyway, I think that
this particular call should be done through __call, not
On Oct 24 15:41:44, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
class Bar {
// override getFoo() to add some specific behaviour
public function getFoo() {
// do the specific stuff
parent::getFoo();
}
}
I think you meant Bar to extend ActiveRecord? But anyway, I think
that this
On Oct 25 0:56:28, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Oct 24 15:41:44, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
class Bar {
// override getFoo() to add some specific behaviour
public function getFoo() {
// do the specific stuff
parent::getFoo();
}
}
I think you meant Bar to
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:04:00AM +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
On Oct 25 0:56:28, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
I think you meant Bar to extend ActiveRecord? But anyway, I think
that this particular call should be done through __call, not
__callStatic, since it's basically non-static call.
