I agree with adding XDebug to core distribution but it must be disabled by
default.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > 2013/3/1 Julien Pauli :
> > > I guess the ini declaration order and then t
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2013/3/1 Julien Pauli :
> > I guess the ini declaration order and then the order the modules get
> loaded
> > in the engine.
>
> We could also look at implementing a module-load-order internally in
> the zend_module struct, as
Hi
2013/3/1 Julien Pauli :
> I guess the ini declaration order and then the order the modules get loaded
> in the engine.
We could also look at implementing a module-load-order internally in
the zend_module struct, as in some extensions like EXIF relies on
mbstring, while the ZEND_MODULE_DEP()s w
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core, I've
> > come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and Suhosin
> into
> > core at the same time.
>
> Suhosin has multiple BC-incompatible and perfor
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:39 AM, David Muir wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2013, at 7:00 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core, I've
> > come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and Suhosin
> into
> > core at th
On 01/03/2013, at 7:00 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core, I've
> come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and Suhosin into
> core at the same time.
>
> 1. It has integration issues with ZO+ in that it h
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> 1. It has integration issues with ZO+ in that it has to be included in a
> specific order (specifically around ini declarations). If it was included
> into core, this could be accounted for allowing for more robust behavior.
I don't use Su
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> It appears that xdebug is borking generator exception handling. Without
> xdebug the following two tests pass, but with it they fail:
>
> Generator::throw() where the exception is caught in the generator
> [Zend/tests/generators/throw_caught.phpt]
>
Derick:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
>
> > Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core,
> > I've come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and
> > Suhosin into core at the same time.
>
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core,
> I've come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and
> Suhosin into core at the same time.
Suhosin has a large performance impact (even the normal patch, without
tu
[...]
Sorry, but I hope you are in some funny sort of mood...
Mike
Hi!
> Based off of the recent discussion around pulling in ZO+ into core, I've
> come to the conclusion that we should also pull in XDebug and Suhosin into
> core at the same time.
Suhosin has multiple BC-incompatible and performance-problematic changes
and limits and the author refused many time
12 matches
Mail list logo
