On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:49 PM Jordan LeDoux wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 7:05 AM Rowan Tommins
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I like Larry's "4 levels", but I've been thinking that there's some
> > existing functionality in PHP which takes a different direction: rather
> > than overloading *operators
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 7:05 AM Rowan Tommins
wrote:
>
> I like Larry's "4 levels", but I've been thinking that there's some
> existing functionality in PHP which takes a different direction: rather
> than overloading *operators*, the language lets you overload *behaviour*.
> We have magic method
On Fri, May 13, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> On 6 May 2022 23:16:37 BST, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
>>I'm not sure at this point how voters think objects and operators should
>>work together into the future. I'd like to see if anyone is willing to have
>>high-level discussion about the ideas
On 6 May 2022 23:16:37 BST, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
>I'm not sure at this point how voters think objects and operators should
>work together into the future. I'd like to see if anyone is willing to have
>high-level discussion about the ideas, instead of picking at the
>implementation or details of a
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:25 PM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> Also, not proposing level 1 on the grounds that it would reduce the
> argument for level 2/3 in the future would effectively be holding level 1
> functionality "hostage" for the more advanced versions, which... would
> probably not work out
On Sat, May 7, 2022, at 3:59 PM, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
> Of the people who did vote no and also provided me feedback, there were
> *mainly* three reasons given (some in public such as on this list, and some
> in private in more direct conversation):
>
> 1. Math is not a valid use case.
> 2. Operato
On 07.05.22 22:59, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
I like the way you organized the different levels of support within the
feature, it's a good organizational structure for thinking about the
feature-set. Given the feedback though, I found myself a little concerned
that if I created a Level 1 proposal, it's
> On May 6, 2022, at 6:16 PM, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I took a while away after my operator overload RFC was declined. I've been
> mulling for the last few months how to move forward while respecting the
> concerns and feedback of those who abstained and those who voted against
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 11:40 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
>
> I would group object operators into 4 categories/levels.
>
> 1. Object-universal operators. This would be support for operators that
> make sense in all domains. Mainly this is the comparison operators but
> there may be others.
> 2. Ari
On Fri, May 6, 2022, at 5:16 PM, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I took a while away after my operator overload RFC was declined. I've been
> mulling for the last few months how to move forward while respecting the
> concerns and feedback of those who abstained and those who voted against.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
