Hi guys,
After making another commit into my ucwords() pr and waiting for an hour or so
I noticed that Travis CI hasn’t picked it up yet; in fact, the previous commit
wasn’t picked up either.
Other pr’s that were created before or after mine were processed, though.
Is this a known issue? It
Hi!
LTP's lcov 1.11 seems to work fine here.
Can we make this a blacklist instead of an annoying whitelist, too, just
like the bison check?
--
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
After making another commit into my ucwords() pr and waiting for an hour
or so I noticed that Travis CI hasn’t picked it up yet; in fact, the
previous commit wasn’t picked up either.
Other pr’s that
Hi!
And while I was trying to figure out what does that mean, or why should
that prevent the travis build, I've just remembered that we don't allow
travis builds for PHP-5.3 and PHP-5.4 branches:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
And while I was trying to figure out what does that mean, or why should
that prevent the travis build, I've just remembered that we don't allow
travis builds for PHP-5.3 and PHP-5.4 branches:
Hi!
mentioned a few times now), and I think this will cause a significant
amount of pain for the people who wanna merge pull requests after the
phpng (or other similar major rewrite) is merged to the master, as they
will be required to backport the changes.
When we will have the major
Hi!
Our RC1 of PHP 5.5.15 was just released today.
You can fetch it from
http://downloads.php.net/jpauli/
The Windows binaries are available at http://windows.php.net/qa/
This release contains a number of bugfixes.
For the list of bugfixes that you can target in your
testing, please refer to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
mentioned a few times now), and I think this will cause a significant
amount of pain for the people who wanna merge pull requests after the
phpng (or other similar major rewrite) is merged to the master, as
Hi!
On 11 Jul, 2014, at 4:29 pm, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
And while I was trying to figure out what does that mean, or why should
that prevent the travis build, I've just remembered that we don't allow
travis builds for PHP-5.3 and PHP-5.4 branches:
hi Dmitry,
And now I wonder why you even bother to propose it if you are going to
push it anyway with phpng. This is not really a good way to push
things, and as phpng is getting bigger and bigger nobody has a clue
about what has been done and a vote will only be biased to begin with,
based only
On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:54, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
And now I wonder why you even bother to propose it if you are going to
push it anyway with phpng. This is not really a good way to push
things, and as phpng is getting bigger and bigger nobody has a clue
about what has been
Yes, please!
Just make sure the old versions are blacklisted (anything older than the
first white-listed version).
Thanks,
Nuno
- Original Message -
Hi!
LTP's lcov 1.11 seems to work fine here.
Can we make this a blacklist instead of an annoying whitelist, too, just
like the bison
On Jul 11, 2014 7:01 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 11 Jul 2014, at 17:54, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
And now I wonder why you even bother to propose it if you are going to
push it anyway with phpng. This is not really a good way to push
things, and as phpng is
On 11 Jul 2014, at 18:20, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
If more inconsistencies are saner, then yes. If more cryptic macros are saner
then yes. Etc.
I like that we use macros more (abstraction is good), and the fact only
refcounted things have reference counts makes far more
hi,
The 1st release of Pickle has been fired.
See the project page for all details:
https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/pickle
phar is available.
Main features:
- fully compatible with current PECL package (package.xml and from pecl.php.net)
- Package conversion
- Windows binary support
- gitco
On Fri 11 Jul 2014 19:58:21 CEST, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
The 1st release of Pickle has been fired.
This is awesome! Great work of all the people contributing!
It feels a bit rough still and throws some notices on install, but,
hey, its 0.1.0 and it worked! ;)
phar is available.
Where,
Hi mike!
On Jul 11, 2014 9:23 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On Fri 11 Jul 2014 19:58:21 CEST, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
The 1st release of Pickle has been fired.
This is awesome! Great work of all the people contributing!
It feels a bit rough still and throws some notices on
Hey Dmitry,
I wonder why you pushed that before having any vote on the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fast_zpp RFC?
Please revert this until we've voted there.
Thank you,
Bob
Am 11.7.2014 um 18:54 schrieb Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
hi Dmitry,
And now I wonder why you even bother to
On 12 Jul 2014, at 00:07, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey Dmitry,
I wonder why you pushed that before having any vote on the
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fast_zpp RFC?
Please revert this until we've voted there.
Especially since not only have we not voted for the RFC itself, none
19 matches
Mail list logo
