On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Hi internals,
I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
the internals and the necessary backing from his company to be able to
dedicate the
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Hi internals,
I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
the internals
Roger captain :)
I'll soon be on IRC to check this out and get used to PHP build tools
and environment :)
Julien.P
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
-Hannes
AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
Julien.P
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Hi internals,
I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
is an active member of the PHP.net community, has deep knowledge of
the
2012/9/17 jpauli jpa...@php.net
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like
--disable-all ?
-Hannes
AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
Julien.P
I don't like the idea, because once --enable-all is
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
On 2012-09-08, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Hi internals,
I would like to go ahead and propose Julien Pauli as the RM for 5.5. He
is an
hi Ferenc,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow, I've expected a bigger discussion about the election of the RMs.
Right, but if only one team volunteers, there is no need of voting,
except if there were objections to one of the members, but there is
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
-Hannes
AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
I'm +1 to add such an option if possible :)
Can you please explain to me how it is
Hi,
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Let's keep things simple here, stay on topic and debate if we want to
start with 5.5 and who can RM it.
I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
back when I was busy with different things at work,
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
a RM/vice-RM kind of pairing.
--
Herman Radtke
hermanrad...@gmail.com |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke hermanrad...@gmail.com wrote:
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong reason to have only one RM, then maybe we should consider
a
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
-Hannes
AFAIR no :) We have a --disable-all , but no --enable-all.
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:05 +0200, jpauli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Herman Radtke hermanrad...@gmail.com wrote:
David, I think you're experienced enough to fill this role alone.
One benefit to having two RM's is that Julien is learning from DSP. If
there is a strong
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual process? Is there something in it that
cannot be described in a
I haven't seen a maintenance notification, and it appears git.php.net may
be down. Anyone else able to reproduce this?
On 09/17/2012 08:47 AM, Will Fitch wrote:
I haven't seen a maintenance notification, and it appears git.php.net may
be down. Anyone else able to reproduce this?
It is down at the moment yes. Slight mixup trying to add some firewall
rules.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
On Sep 17, 2012, at 8:30 AM, jpauli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
I'm confused.. --enable-all is already supported, just like --disable-all ?
-Hannes
AFAIR no :)
Hi, all -
There's a bug in the current version of 5.3 and 5.4 with pdo_pgsql and
boolean PDO types. Here's a summary of the issue:
The following cases cause pgsql boolean types to be converted to an
incompatible (long) format:
1. PQprepare is not available (HAVE_PQPREPARE is undefined). This
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org wrote:
On Sep 17, 2012, at 8:30 AM, jpauli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, jpauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
I'm confused.. --enable-all
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 17:45 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual
On 2012-09-17, Sebastian Bergmann sebast...@php.net wrote:
Am 17.09.2012 17:36, schrieb Johannes Schl?ter:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README.
Does this have to be manual
hi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 07:49 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
I wonder if we really need two RMs. This two-RM-thing was introduced
back when I was busy with different things at work, university,
live, ... when
hi,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
There are very few special processes. In fact the only RM-specific
things are around packaging the tarballs up, while that's described in
an README. Besides that all processes affect everybody in the
24 matches
Mail list logo
