On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
No, goahead :)
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 18.08.2014 14:53, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Marc Bennewitz php@mabe.berlin wrote:
On 17.08.2014 22:18, Sara Golemon wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Marc Bennewitz php@mabe.berlin wrote:
I've created a draft RFC and patch to change the behavior
On 18.08.2014 17:43, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 17:30 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
foreach ($db-query(SELECT id, title FROM entries) as $row) {
echo trtd;
if ($row[0] == $_GET['highlight_id']) {
echo background='#ff';
}
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Aug 2014, at 06:52, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
1) INF conversion to zero seems wrong. May be +INF should be converted to
MAX_LONG and -INF to MIN_LONG?
I think of Infinity as more of an error value than an actual number. Not using
MAX_LONG and MIN_LONG means it casts to the
On 19.08.2014 05:07, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de mailto:johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 23:09 +0800, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
On 18 Aug, 2014, at 10:47 pm, Johannes Schlüter
On 20 Aug 2014, at 03:53, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good evening,
I have made an RFC which would make some small changes to how integers are
handled, targeted at PHP 7:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/integer_semantics
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Johannes Schlüter
johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 23:09 +0800, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
On 18 Aug, 2014, at 10:47 pm, Johannes Schlüter
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 20 Aug 2014, at 03:53, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good evening,
I have made an RFC which would make some small changes to how integers are
handled,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 20 Aug 2014, at 06:52, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
1) INF conversion to zero seems wrong. May be +INF should be converted
to MAX_LONG and -INF to MIN_LONG?
I think of Infinity as more of an error value than an
The are not defined.
They are open (or closed but not freed yet).
You probably meant get_defined_resorce_types()
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 19.8.2014 um 00:09 schrieb Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
Since we've had phpng branch merged to master the build on Travis CI is
broken for master (as in, doesn't even build). Could it be fixed? It's
On 20/08/14 11:12, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
On 18.08.2014 17:43, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 17:30 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
foreach ($db-query(SELECT id, title FROM entries) as $row) {
echo trtd;
if ($row[0] == $_GET['highlight_id']) {
Good afternoon,
I’m putting this RFC to a vote again as I haven’t heard any objections in the
past three days, and in the event something’s been missed, one week would be
long enough to spot it.
Vote is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closure_apply#vote
It ends 2014-08-27. Thanks!
--
Andrea
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Nikita,
I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that
wasn’t clear to me.
This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral changes in addition to the
AST.
Are these as a side-effect of how AST was
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nikita,
I second some of Andi's concerns about behavioural changes, some things
working from right-to-left and not left-to-right. Are these things that we
can adapt the AST part or tweak another part to make this
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Nikita,
I second some of Andi's concerns about behavioural changes, some things
working from right-to-left and not left-to-right. Are
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Paul Dragoonis dragoo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Nikita,
I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that
wasn’t clear to me.
This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral
On 20.08.2014 12:46, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 20/08/14 11:12, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
On 18.08.2014 17:43, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 17:30 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
foreach ($db-query(SELECT id, title FROM entries) as $row) {
echo trtd;
if
The only thing I'd suggest is like I said in the last email is to make the
syntax more like Closure::bind(Closure $closure, object $newThis, [mixed
$newScope = 'static']) and make it Closure::apply(mixed $newObjectOrScope
[, mixed ... $parameters]) $newObjectOrScope would then allow a user to
On 19/08/14 01:59, Stas Malyshev wrote:
- EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, we do not accept new non-security bugfixes into
5.4 branch unless they are very important ones (and that is only because
people may, in theory, have pending patches and we didn't give advance
notice). Importance would have to be
On 20.08.2014 19:50, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
2014.08.17. 21:59 ezt írta (Marc Bennewitz php@mabe.berlin):
Hi internals!
I've created a draft RFC and patch to change the behavior of
non-strict string to string comparison to be binary safe (as the strict
comparison operator does):
Hello Dmitry,
On 20.08.2014 12:08, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
To have a robust way to detect resource leaks I propose a new
function -
get_resources() that returns an array of all registered resources or
an
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Nathan nathan.br...@starin.biz wrote:
The only thing I'd suggest is like I said in the last email is to make the
syntax more like Closure::bind(Closure $closure, object $newThis, [mixed
$newScope = 'static']) and make it Closure::apply(mixed $newObjectOrScope
On 20 Aug 2014, at 19:36, Marc Bennewitz php@mabe.berlin wrote:
On 20.08.2014 19:50, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Maybe it was already mentionex, but just to make sure: this would fix
issues like https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54547
Yes, such comparison issues will go away!
It would,
On 19.08.2014 00:41, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I opted for master-only on the grounds that while it's an improvement,
it's not really a bugfix, and released versions (or versions as near
to release as 5.6 is) should be bug-fix only. I know there's an
argument for this *being* a bug-fix,
Hi!
Apparently the fix for #67724 [2] caused #67865 [1], but I already have
a fix for the fix (oh my) [3].
I've reverted it from 5.4.32, but please commit this fix in 5.4. As phar
is currently broken, fix for this qualifies as important.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM:
Hi!
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
For the function get_resources, the proto says it has no arguments, but
it actually has one S argument that is
Hi!
Removed phpdbg build from configure, and master builds fine.
Removed its tests as well to have travis finish green.
Did you commit it? I see Travis CI build is still broken.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
done.
Dmitry.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
For the
30 matches
Mail list logo
