Morning Andrea,
Who is widely deploying something that does absolutely nothing ?
The only reason to keep it would be that we are going to change the
default representation, as pointed out we're not.
This cannot have been left in for considered reasons, it was just
forgotten about.
نمي دانم تا به حال با کسي رفيق بوده ايد يا نه، اما طبيعي است که هر کسي در طول
زندگي با افراد زيادي ارتباط برقرار مي کند; خواه اين ارتباط قوي و صميمي باشد،
خواه ضعيف و در حد يک سلام و احوال پرسي. جالب است و شايد هم باور کردنش خت باشد،
اما واقعيت دارد و آن اين که هيچ کسي نيست که به شهداء سلام
Hi Pedro,
I don't support this removal.
Currently, yes, the flag doesn't do anything, and it's unlikely to do so
in future, as Nikita points out.
However, it's not improbable that we might see a `u` flag in future, and
if that was added, `b` might still be useful as an explicit counterpart.
Hi,
Fleshgrinder wrote:
It is not very readable and repetitive. It would be interesting to
support a more mathematical notation for this:
```
if (0 < $x < 42) {
echo 'x is in (0, 42)';
}
if (0 <= $x <= 42) {
echo 'x is in [0, 42]';
}
```
I cannot judge how complicated it is to
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Scott Arciszewski
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can we change openssl_public_encrypt() and openssl_private_decrypt() from
>> defaulting to PKCS1v1.5 padding, in favor of
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:56 PM, François Laupretre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it was stated during the pre-7 discussions, that this flag would be kept
> for possible future unicode-compliant developments. So, people needing
> binary strings are still encouraged to use the flag, even if
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:59 PM David Rodrigues
wrote:
> I guess that the biggest problem is about the code parsing. Currently PHP
> should supports what you wrote, but with another meaning. And personally I
> think that this feature is not too common on programming
I guess that the biggest problem is about the code parsing. Currently PHP
should supports what you wrote, but with another meaning. And personally I
think that this feature is not too common on programming language in
general, once that it is possible from first format (maybe more clear too).
Em
Validating whether a number is within a closed or open interval is
currently possible only via a construct like the following:
```
if (0 < $x && $x < 42) {
echo 'x is in (0, 42)';
}
if (0 <= $x && $x <= 42) {
echo 'x is in [0, 42]';
}
```
It is not very readable and repetitive. It would
Hi,
it was stated during the pre-7 discussions, that this flag would be kept
for possible future unicode-compliant developments. So, people needing
binary strings are still encouraged to use the flag, even if it is not
used in the current versions.
Regards
François
Le 06/11/2016 à 20:22,
2016-11-06 20:19 GMT+01:00 Jakub Zelenka :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Scott Arciszewski
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can we change openssl_public_encrypt() and openssl_private_decrypt() from
> > defaulting to PKCS1v1.5 padding, in favor of
Hi internals,
I've created a PR (https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2187) aiming at
the removal of the binary string forward compatibility.
Reproducing the description of the PR:
In version 5.2.1, the b prefix and the (binary) cast were introduced for
forward compatibility with the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Scott Arciszewski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can we change openssl_public_encrypt() and openssl_private_decrypt() from
> defaulting to PKCS1v1.5 padding, in favor of defaulting to OAEP?
>
> I'll create an RFC for this later. It will just prevent a
Hi everyone,
Two weeks have passed since this RFC was put to discussion here.
Therefore, I'm going to put it to a vote for inclusion in PHP 7.2.
Voting starts today, 2016-11-06, and will close after two weeks on the
Sunday 2016-11-20 at midnight.
The RFC and voting widget can be found here:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 at 19:13 Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > On 24/10/2016 07:16, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >> c. Get some specific people to volunteer to review patches in security
> >> repo regularly - how? Any takers?
> >
> > I'd be happy to help with reviewing and
15 matches
Mail list logo