osure are by-value, so I can't
> see what side effects you might be thinking of ?
>
It's clear to me that foo() will return NULL, but how many warnings about
unused variable $y will we get?
Thanks. Dmitry.
>
> Cheers
> Joe
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dm
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 02:13 PM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, September
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 11:58 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com
> > <mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com>> wrote:
> > Redhat ena
e hits
231,287,491,307
cycles
107.742837269 seconds time elapsed
May be we should enable this by default in RC (may be also file cache) and
make decision based on feedback?
Thanks. Dmtiry.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@php.net> wrot
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol@belski.net>
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:58 PM
> > To: Anatol Belski <a...@php.ne
Hi Stas,
I don't see the crash. Integer keys are supported in exactly the same way
as it was in PHP-5.
$ sapi/cli/php -r '$a = [1=>5]; $o = (object)$a; var_dump($o); $s =
serialize($o); var_dump($s);var_dump(unserialize($s));'
object(stdClass)#1 (1) {
[1]=>
int(5)
}
string(27)
corresponding API in zend.h
and SAPI.h.
Thanks. Dmitry
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dmitry Stogov dmi...@php.net
Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 4:10 PM
Subject: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: HANDLE_BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS() is not used by
SAPIs anymore. It may be useful only when PHP configured
Hi Anatol,
I don't see any problem adding ZEND_LONG_INT_OVF and similar macros into
7.0.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net
wrote:
Hi Rowan,
-Original Message-
From: Rowan Collins [mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015
This is good idea.
Some times ago I played with hot attribute, and didn't get any
improvement, but we really may
This is good idea.
Some times ago I played with hot attribute, and didn't get any
improvement, but we really may get something with cold.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry, all,
Has it been considered to use
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
H Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
[...]
Look at e.g. is_numeric() or strpos
Hi Matt,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi again,
- Original Message -
From: Matt Wilmas
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Hi Dmitry, all,
Help me understand this. :-) It's been more puzzling to me recently
since just coming to the
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Hi Matt,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi again,
- Original
I can confirm minor but consistent speed up on applications with big code
base.
The PR was merged into master.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Andone, Bogdan bogdan.and...@intel.com
wrote:
Running php-cgi -T1 on WordPress4.1/index.php I see ~1%
performance
increase for
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi again Dmitry, all,
Hopefully the final update on this, before all is revealed... :-)
- Original Message -
From: Matt Wilmas
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015
Hi again Dmitry, all,
[...]
Just
Hi Bogdan,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andone, Bogdan bogdan.and...@intel.com
wrote:
Hi Guys,
My name is Bogdan Andone and I work for Intel in the area of SW
performance analysis and optimizations.
We would like to actively contribute to Zend PHP project and to involve
ourselves in
On Jul 31, 2015 2:12 AM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry, Bogdan,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015
Hi Bogdan,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Andone, Bogdan bogdan.and...@intel.com
wrote:
Hi Guys,
My name is Bogdan
I use 'CC=gcc -m32 ./configure' to build 32-bit PHP on 64-bit Linux.
This works fine, if you have all necessary 32-bit libraries and dev
packages.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Jul 10, 2015 11:14 PM, Bishop Bettini bis...@php.net wrote:
Hi!
Is it expected that compiling as 32-bit on 64-bit will succeed?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 29.06.2015 um 19:14 schrieb Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me:
Hi again,
On 29 Jun 2015, at 18:02, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yes, it generally makes sense...
Then I have other questions:
- Why do we
Hi Anatol,
I don't see any problems committing this.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net
wrote:
Hi,
regarding the mentioned tickets I've prepared a patch
https://github.com/php/php-src/compare/master...weltling:pipe_blocking_win
.
I, personally, don't have strong opinion. Both behaviors work for me.
Bob, if you are going to change this, please show the patch first.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi again,
On 29 Jun 2015, at 18:02, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com
. It will be a separate
optional commit. You’ll see if time allows to include it. Anyway, this
mustn’t be blocking inclusion in 7.0.
Regards
François
*De :* Anatol Belski [mailto:anatol@belski.net]
*Envoyé :* vendredi 26 juin 2015 21:16
*À :* 'Dmitry Stogov'; 'francois'
*Cc :* 'Anatol
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry, all,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry, all,
- Original
xdebug_check_branch_entry_handler(ZEND_OPCODE_HANDLER_ARGS)
Is there a different way for declaring/defining these functions now? (I
could just expand the ZEND_OPCODE_HANDLER_ARGS macro myself, but that's
cheating...
cheers,
Derick
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Commit
Hi Francois,
From the source code review, I don't see any problems.
May be too aggressive usage of inline functions in zend_string
implementation, but I hope, it shouldn't make any harm.
I'll need to check, if C compilers are smart enough to produce good
optimized code after inlining.
In general
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
You shouldn't use opcode handlers directly, we have a use USER_OPCODE
API.
typedef int (*user_opcode_handler_t) (zend_execute_data *execute_data);
#define
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry, all,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015
We should NOT use it everywhere. It'll lead to code bloat.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 14:52 +0200, Nikita Popov wrote:
However what it doesn't do, and what I wouldn't consider feasible to do,
is
ensure that every single string conversion in library functions is
exception
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
We should NOT use it everywhere. It'll lead to code bloat.
OK. Thank you.
I'll use it only for functions called many times. e.g
yeah. thanks for catching this. moved.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Christoph Becker cmbecke...@gmx.de wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Commit:ed5fbf5e49eab435cd7a0a9a5627698de92887c1
Author:Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com Fri, 5 Jun 2015
10:04:58 +0300
/rfc/fast_zpp
Last year's Dmirty's commit message say, it should
only applied to most used functions due to the state of
Fast ZPP.
commit 27f38798a1963de1c60aae4ef8a3675138255574
Author: Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com
Date: Fri Jul 11 16:32:20 2014 +0400
Fast parameter
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 06/22/2015 05:11 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Rasmus,
Your latest changes broke more than 100 tests.
Sorry, but I had to revert your commits and related Bob's fixes.
You may find them in internal-arg-info
Hi Rasmus,
Your latest changes broke more than 100 tests.
Sorry, but I had to revert your commits and related Bob's fixes.
You may find them in internal-arg-info branch.
Please, don't do experiments on the common code base at beta stage.
On the other hand, I don't see a big problem committing
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 06/22/2015 01:27 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Actually, when you added type hints, php compiler stopped optimizing and
using ZEND_DEFINED (and others) instead of internal function calls, but
of course this shouldn't
right. thanks.
Dmitry.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Commit:48ed660cdf6fe94ac2cd8eac217ea97340766e75
Author:Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com
:28 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
I see only the test for packed array. You may create similar hash
array, initializing it in reverse order.
It's better approach to see the difference because
Hi,
I made a quick code review, and I don't see any technical problems in
implementation.
1) Anyway, I think it's a bad idea to rename EngineException (and others)
into Error(s).
This will prevent using class Error in applications, and may potentially
break some of them.
I also don't like
I see only the test for packed array. You may create similar hash
array, initializing it in reverse order.
In my experiments packed arrays are slightly (8%) faster.
$ sapi/cli/php packed.php
Time: 0.022471189498901
Time: 0.012310028076172
$ sapi/cli/php hash.php
Time: 0.024425029754639
Time:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Aaron Piotrowski aa...@icicle.io wrote:
On Jun 15, 2015, at 6:56 AM, Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com dmi...@zend.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:53 AM
Hi,
I found a problem with spaceship operator.
It doesn't define result for comparison with NaN.
$ sapi/cli/php -r 'var_dump(sqrt(-1) = 0);'
int(-1)
$ sapi/cli/php -r 'var_dump(0 = sqrt(-1));'
int(-1)
$ sapi/cli/php -r 'var_dump(0 sqrt(-1));'
bool(false)
all other comparison operators return
I think REGISTER_INTERFACE() macro in zend_interfaces.h is better.
Actually, it's not related to ITERATORs at all.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Aaron Piotrowski aa...@icicle.io wrote:
On Jun 15, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Aaron Piotrowski aa...@icicle.io wrote:
Does anyone have any questions, comments, or concerns about the
Throwable Interface RFC?
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/throwable-interface
The proposed
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hah, looks like this just changed last week after barely 3 weeks. :-P I
didn't verify, just noticed the code change:
and also forgot _DEREF suffix in IDENTICAL/NOT_IDENTICAL opcodes. :(
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
- Original Message -
From: Dmitry Stogov
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Hi Sara,
https://gist.github.com
Hi Sara,
https://gist.github.com/dstogov/6a90601872b538d2ddd6
I see no problems committing this (running tests now).
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
Dmitry, what's the reasoning behind this diff in the first place?
Doesn't the
I don't see a big problem changing this for few opcodes in PHP-7 VM, and
make behavior more defined.
On the other hand I don't think we shouldn't define the order of operand
evaluation.
This may prevent us performing optimisations in the future.
Fixing this in PHP-5.* doesn't cost the effort from
Hi Stas,
This should be fixed now.
As I understood you already fixed the second problem.
Thanks for catching this.
Dmitry.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Looking into bug #69295 I've noticed the following problem with hashes
on master: if
. Dmitry.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On May 26, 2015 11:43 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com
wrote:
On 05/26/2015 07:33 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Commit
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On May 28, 2015 1:47 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Pierre,
It looks like the training process is not a trivial task.
It may speedup one apps and slowdown others.
In my experiments training
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 05/26/2015 07:33 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Commit:7dac4d449f72d7eb029aa1a8ee87aaf38e17e1c5
Author:Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com Tue, 26 May 2015
17:33:25 +0300
Parents
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On May 13, 2015 7:57 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
Hello people.
Time is going, and summer is coming.
I think we must have branched 7.0 until end of May, and have our 2 RMs
elected.
Don't forget
Hi Kalle,
I don't think we should support all possible use cases introducing new C
functions and modifiers.
Users already have ability to get all the necessary information, and they
may wrap memory_get_udage() as they like.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
. Even more as we
have to upgrade it, this time it was a jump over about 5 releases (and
probably we should catch the 5.23 if it’s out propitious with PHP7 timing,
as it’ll stay in maybe for the whole first minor).
Regards
Anatol
*From:* Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
*Sent
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
I spent a little bit of time today trying to debug an issue with 7
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I spent a little bit of time today trying to debug an issue with 7
that Drupal 8 was facing, specifically regarding an array index not
behaving correctly ($array[key] returned null, even though the key
existed
Hi Andrey,
I didn't get why do you need this extension and how it's going to be used.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrey Hristov p...@hristov.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to hear comments about a small change to the low-level tick
functionality (main/php_ticks.c) to add
include your ticks
extension there.
If we accept it, we will accept all together.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Andrey Hristov p...@hristov.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On 7.04.2015 16:33, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi Andrey,
I didn't get why do you need this extension and how it's
I don' t see any problems.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Your approach is definitely a better one, and I have no objection to
it whatsoever.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi,
On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
May be you'll also suggest something regarding bitwise shifts with
negative offset?
Allowing negative offsets using opposite directions would fix
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
offsets. I also propose to change it in the same way (Fatal error at
compile-time, Exception in run-time).
Can you describe the weird behavior for
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:04, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
2) Very similar weird behavior was introduced for shift with negative
offsets. I also propose to change it in the same way (Fatal error at
compile
3) One more problem is modulo :(
$ sapi/cli/php -n -r var_dump(1 % 0);
Warning: Division by zero in Command line code on line 1
bool(false)
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi,
On 3 Apr 2015, at 21:34, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
3) One more problem is modulo :(
$ sapi/cli/php -n -r var_dump(1 % 0);
Warning: Division by zero in Command line code on line 1
bool(false)
Hmm
On Apr 4, 2015 12:34 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi,
On 3 Apr 2015, at 20:46, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
May be you'll
1) Division by zero behavior in PHP is really inconsistent.
It emits WARNING and returns FALLE.
Note, that since PHP-5.6 division by zero may also occur in constant
expressions. They are compiled and evaluated only once (on first request)
and on next request WARNING is going to be hidden.
$ cat
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Your approach is definitely a better one, and I have no objection to
it whatsoever.
Your patch was quite good. You just didn't know what this NULL return
required a hack in the PHP core :)
Sorry, I was
committed into master.
Dan, please update the RFC accordingly.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Your approach is definitely a better one, and I have
Hi Dan,
any update? should I commit it?
or do you see any problems?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
The updated patch is at https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1205
The main difference is in ext/intl.
If you don't see any
PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
The updated patch is at https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1205
The main difference is in ext/intl.
If you don't see any problems I can commit it.
I didn't think
:
On 26 March 2015 at 20:19, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
however the patch looks a bit surprising to me.
We have special function to do this - zend_ctor_make_null() and some
tricks in the VM.
I made just a quick look over your patch but didn't find any references
to them
Unfortunately this id not so simple :(
If we change class_exists() the following code will stop working
?php
if (!class_exists(SomeInternalClass)) {
class SomeInternalClass {}
}
?
On the other hand function_exists() already behaves differently. (so
function_exists() and class_exists() are
Hi Dan,
Your RFC is going to be accepted and I support the idea, however the patch
looks a bit surprising to me.
Actually, returning NULL from constructors wasn't simple :)
We have special function to do this - zend_ctor_make_null() and some tricks
in the VM.
I made just a quick look over your
, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently, Xinchen and me worked on optimization that eliminates useless
reallocations and copying during string concatenation (ZEND_ADD_STRING
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
I thought about something like this :)
In my opinion UString is really not a proper way to implement Unicoide,
but I agree not break anything
Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
I thought about something like
Hi,
Recently, Xinchen and me worked on optimization that eliminates useless
reallocations and copying during string concatenation (ZEND_ADD_STRING and
family + ZEND_CONCAT).
The idea comes from ropes, but adopted especially for our needs.
Rope is popular data structure in languages with
, Albert Casademont
albertcasadem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
I compiled it with gcc 4.7.2 and the bench.php performed well. Where did
you find the errors?
Albert
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Please also tell your GCC version.
We had problems
in [1]:
[1] https://gist.github.com/caioso/9360bd95e829c4172446
Do you need any other information?
Thank you very much!
Caio
From: Dmitry Stogov [mailto:dmi...@zend.com]
Sent: terça-feira, 17 de março de 2015 20:22
To: Caio Souza Oliveira
Cc: Albert Casademont Filella
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Dmitry, the perf boost of this is awesome, but is it completely safe?
Won't a signal potentially overwrite a register variable here? Like on a
timeout, for example?
The docs say
We use preserved CPU registers.
According to ABI called functions have to keep them unchanged. Of course
they may save and then restore them back.
I didn't see any problems yet, however I know that some old GCC may
generate invalid code when using global registers.
Most probably we will have to
-src/commit/fb4b7069842491eb66272587422a1f61d41eb869
[2] https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1181
--
From: Albert Casademont Filella [mailto:albertcasadem...@gmail.com]
Sent: terça-feira, 17 de março de 2015 13:23
To: Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa
Cc: Dmitry Stogov; Ard Biesheuvel
Stogov dmi...@php.net
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM
Subject: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Enable GCC global register variables if
available: Zend/Zend.m4 Zend/zend_execute.c
To: php-...@lists.php.net
Commit:fb4b7069842491eb66272587422a1f61d41eb869
Author:Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com Tue
Please also tell your GCC version.
We had problems with 4.6.3 and 4.7.0, so we disabled global variables for
GCC prior 4.8.0.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Caio,
Could you please run make test with and without the patch and compare
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Stelian Mocanita steli...@php.net wrote:
So to get it clear for everyone: the right way is for internals to ignore
community as a
whole, stick to their own views and implement something nobody actually
wants
Few people already told - they like this.
Thanks.
In general, it's possible to implement necessary function for GOTO executor
as well.
It's just not trivial.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mar 14, 2015 3:06 PM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 13.03.2015 um 05:01
Hi Xinchen,
I don't like to remove anything. I think GOTO may be made faster. It's just
not very interesting to invest into it, because CALL is more suitable.
execute_data-opline-handler(execute_data); won't work with CALL and
global CPU registers s well :(
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Fri, Mar 13,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about
scalar types. So, they both still possibly may fail.
Thus, I'd like to come up with a fallback proposal in case both proposals
fail:
Hi,
Unsafe max_execution_time and Out of Memory handling is a huge problem,
that often lead to crashes and SHM corruption.
The PoC solves the first problem.
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1173
Instead of throwing zend_error() from signal handler, now we just set
EG(vm_interrupt) and
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Just passing by to announce I already have a working version of the new
patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1158
The patch
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Instead of throwing zend_error() from signal handler, now we just set
EG(vm_interrupt) and EG(timed_out) flags. PHP VM checks EG(vm_interrupt)
flag on each JMPx instruction (potential loop iteration) and
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I think, after max_execution_time is exceeded, we may start another
hard_timeout, and in case the EG(vm_interrupt) wasn't handled
safely, kill the process.
I remember such proposal floating on the list
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about
scalar types. So, they both still possibly may fail.
Thus,
On Mar 8, 2015 9:26 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi internals!
Voting on the engine exceptions RFC, which proposes to convert existing
fatal and recoverable fatal errors into exceptions, has opened:
On Mar 9, 2015 1:24 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Xinchen Hui wrote:
Hey Internals:
I was looking Bob's switch optimization..
then I start to worry about where is the place optimization
should goes..
in generally, PHP is a
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 09.03.2015 um 11:24 schrieb Derick Rethans der...@php.net:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Xinchen Hui wrote:
Hey Internals:
I was looking Bob's switch optimization..
then I start to worry about where is
, but the slower compilation.
It is a bit different to the thing we think of as JIT ... new names are
good if old names don't fit ...
:)
Thanks. Dmitry.
Cheers
Joe
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
It may be to late for 7.0.
I feel the same way. It may be better to try add it with 7.x.
Also Alexander liked to to add another
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Zeev,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
So I do apologize to the person. I don't to the code.
I wanted to verify whether my gut was correct (minimal amount of output,
and
stdout
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 5:44 PM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Zend JIT Open Sourced
Zeev,
On
501 - 600 of 1669 matches
Mail list logo
