On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ryan McCue li...@rotorised.com wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
the aggregated report summaries are available at
http://qa.php.net/reports/ thanks to Oliver Doucet who make this
happen.
Which, incidentally, doesn't appear to be working at this point in time
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dirk Haun d...@haun-online.de wrote:
Quoting Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ryan McCue li...@rotorised.com wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
the aggregated report summaries are available at
http://qa.php.net/reports/ thanks
If I am reading things right, is_a was only designed to handle an object, so
feeding it a mixed parameter in isError was always wrong? As far as I can
see, on the whole, the PEAR code only ever feeds an object and feeding it a
string would have to be a real error? So there are a number of
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 8/24/11 2:03 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi Internals,,
after 3 weeks of discussion, I think we are ready to start voting on
the DVCS RFC. If you think something is missing or should be explained
in
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for providing the timeline.
On 8/24/11 2:15 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
5, Helgi fixed Pear in the meanwhile
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pear/pear-core/tags/PEAR-1.9.5/PEAR.php?r1=313081r2=313083pathrev
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
David Muir wrote:
FWIW, PEAR is already moving to GitHub.
So who dictated that
There should at least be a little consistency in PHP and this is just
another example of everybody just doing what they want and sod
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Sebastian Bergmann sebast...@php.net wrote:
I have attached a patch to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55490 that
implements ReflectionClass::newInstanceWithoutConstructor() to create an
object a class without invoking the constructor.
As there are
If I could vote I'd vote for mercurial, but then again, I bet having PHP on
github will increase contributions very quickly.
which is pointless if we can't easily accept/merge the pull requests
from the github clone. :/
git itself is a powerful tool, but as AFAIK most of the people in this
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 August 2011 08:48, dukeofgaming dukeofgam...@gmail.com wrote:
Having current SVN-only contributors learn it might going to be quite a
challenge.
That's me. And I am VERY used to TortoiseSVN - a visual tool
I use CVS and SVN directly from Eclipse and I know exactly where you are
coming from. Currently this all runs transparently on all platforms and many
of the 'reasons' given for wanting to change are already supported by
additional tools _in_ Eclipse.
http://eclipse.org/egit/
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:20 AM, PEAR Announce pear-...@lists.php.net wrote:
The new PEAR package DB_DataObject-1.9.6 (stable) has been released at
http://pear.php.net/.
Release notes
-
Small fix release.
#18749 - Fix is_a() for 5.3.7+ due to php-core stupidity
#18602 -
Please, don't speak for the majority of the core devs when that's
really not the case.
My comment was based on the responses on the mailing list and the
issue tracker, but feel free to elaborate!
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
you are the only one to actually experience this, so I suppose you are
the only who can fix it as well :)
from Gwynne:
This issue exists on Darwin (OS X) as well.
this will also happen with debian wheezy(next stable
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Hannes Magnusson bj...@php.net wrote:
Throw qa and internals@ into the loop to.
I'd also like to move the XFAIL section (printed out in the end) above
the FAIL section.
We have bucketloads of xfailed tests, I actually have to scroll up to
see the failed tests
2011/9/1 Hannes Magnusson bj...@php.net:
2011/9/1 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 17:53 +0400, Alexey Shein wrote:
Great addition.
While you're at it, could you also add an option to print a list of
skipped tests (maybe above XFAIL section), that's also
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 20:58, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
Please show me one system relying on it? 13 years old...
Your own test box before Rasmus pointed it out to you when you where
changing
2011/9/2 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
On 9/2/11 1:14 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Looking at the tests we have: Most tests are written with mysqlnd in
focus. mysqlnd is what we (Oracle/MySQL) test the most in PHP
perspective for quite some time already. By making mysqlnd the
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/2/11 1:41 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I think you missed the referenced [1]:
[1] Yes, we will still allow building with libmysql and we will fix bugs
reported there and we will verify it works but focus
Hi,
I started debugging why ext/pcre/tests/006.phpt fails, I've pinpointed
the guilty commit:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=311323
it seems that the behavior was depending on the backtrack limit, but
I'm not sure what to do with the test.
should I simply delete? or can we change
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
New thread ...
My SUSE installs all have mysqlnd included in the core, As do other
Linux distributions. I think for much the same reason that the windows
builds do as well? The PHP development team have decided that
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
It is part of the default exts just like on unix with the difference windows
has no libmysql support anymore since 5.3
so for windows, the mysqlnd is a builtin extension, (but one cannot
use it without the mysql or mysqli
Weak references have been implemented in a PECL extension since weeks now:
http://php.net/weakref and/or http://pecl.php.net/weakref
It feels like you're beating up a dead horse here.
A discussion for bundling it might occur in the future, but given the
feedbacks PECL might very well be the
(as Tyrael pointed in his message), which was fixed for
PHP_5_4 and trunk in this commit:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=312110. Maybe PHP_5_3
branch should be changed accordingly?
2011/9/4 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
On 9/2/11 6:10 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Alexey Shein con...@gmail.com wrote:
It fails for me too, but only in PHP_5_3 branch, PHP_5_4 and trunk are
ok. It seems it starts to fail after Rasmus's default backtrack limit
increasion (as Tyrael pointed in his message), which was fixed for
PHP_5_4 and
maybe a function_exist() check
here?
Sendt fra min iPhone
Den 02/09/2011 kl. 22.28 skrev Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@php.net:
tyrael Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:28:39 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=316056
Log:
pass an absolute path
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net wrote:
Hi
2011/9/4 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@php.net:
Sorry, for the late reply, I missed this mail:
I checked the documentation, but I can't see a mention about this
http://php.net/realpath
could somebody confirm
Hi.
the test mentioned in the subject fails on the current trunk.
it seems that
Dynamic Library Support = enabled
Path to sendmail = -t -i
is now missing of the output of php -n --ri standard
I've checked and with the current trunk, it is missing from even php
-i(aka phpinfo)
I think that this
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.09.2011 19:52, schrieb Stas Malyshev:
There are incimoatibilities too across libmysql versions and across
mysql servers, which are actually affecting existing codes.
I don't know of any incompatibilities that
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
I have the pdo_mysql common.phpt test failing on my config, specifically the
REDIRECTTEST part. It is probably due to the way I run the tests, but other
tests work fine, only this one is wrong. So my environment
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Ferenc Kovacs i...@tyrael.hu wrote:
Hi.
I would like to know what is the current status of the LFS support for
php.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=27792
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48886
As far as I can see, there are some patches floating
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 21:09, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/6/11 11:35 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
Yes, we use the
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
Since we started to pay real attention to our unit tests now, I wonder if we
could set up some kind of frequently-running CI system that could be used to
screen commits and identify breakage early? That'd help
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Alexey Shein con...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I've made some improvements to run-tests.php:
1) Autoguessing TEST_PHP_EXECUTABLE and TEST_PHP_CGI_EXECUTABLE if
they're not provided, i.e. assume they have value 'auto'. You can
still pass your own value as usual.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com wrote:
In Bug #54089 [1] a patch was applied that cuts of token_get_all()
output after a T_HALT_COMPILER token. This was done because otherwise
PHP would keep on lexing after that and would generate errors because
of binary
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Alexey Shein wrote:
Hello, Lester, try to start from scratch by running ./vcsclean first,
often it helps to solve all cache issues from previous builds.
No go ...
'Can't figure out your VCS, not cleaning.'
the
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
care to comment?
It looks like neither me nor others (inluding gcov machine) are getting that
message.
AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
display_startup_errors and error_reporting
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/11/11 8:44 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
AFAIK you shoud get it(as I did on my debian machines), as both
display_startup_errors and error_reporting is force enabled for the
tests:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc
I forget to reply-all to the list :/
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/12/11 3:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
you should pass both -n and -c as the make test pass those to the
run-tests.php AFAIK, see:
That's not what I see happening
.
Hope it helps.
2011/9/12 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
I forget to reply-all to the list :/
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
On 9/12/11 3:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
you should pass both -n and -c as the make test pass those to the
run
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/13/11 7:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Stas, I still don't know why do have a custom php.ini, and why is it used.
The make test should create tmp-php.ini for you (and copy your
Everybody has custom php.ini
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/13/11 11:04 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
as I mentioned before, make test (at least it should) passes the -n -c
argument to run-tests.php
see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/Makefile.global?view
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
On 09/13/2011 12:25 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
I changed my previous patch to an SVN patch, so it is easier to apply
and added another patch (the one called tokenizer_patch_full.txt),
which additionally
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/13/11 11:04 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
as I mentioned before, make test (at least it should) passes the -n -c
argument to run-tests.php
see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/Makefile.global?view
./vcsclean ./buildconf --force
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
FYI, you might should delete the autom4te.cache folder too :-)
thanks
2011/9/14 Christian Stocker chr...@php.net:
Hi
I still have this. even after re-running buildconf (and deleting
no problem, I just mentioned because it is easier to remember, and it
should take care of the similar problems.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Christian Stocker
christian.stoc...@liip.ch wrote:
On 14.09.11 09:00, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
./vcsclean ./buildconf --force
ok, that helped. Thanks
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Laruence wrote:
SessionHandler is not stable now, and remain some bugs need to be
fixed(one open bug #55690, and test failed)
It's a beta release. Bugs may occur (that's why we have betas!).
it's
Why do we even have this tmp-php.ini? Why not just make test without
any .ini files, i.e. just with -n option?
[20:44:09] bjori Tyrael: tmp-php.ini is built from the system ini
[20:44:45] bjori Tyrael: if he builds php with
--with-config-file-scan-dir=/where/ever/he/has/another/php.ini, then
Wait wait wait. Thats the point here?
__COMPILER_HALT_OFFSET__ already tells you where the data starts.
-Hannes
I didn't sent this message first, but after reading the mail from
Chris, I think maybe it would clear the confusion:
It is about tokenizing a file which has __halt_compiler(); in
maybe Richard referring to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55085 ?
but those change only affects the abstract classes.
Tyrael
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Richard!
Which change are you talking about? I just tried doing:
?php
class A
do you know any reason for this?
The reason for this is simply that B must act like A since every B object is
also an object of A.
The reason for restricting the method signature in the Subclass is to
guarantee that an instance of a Subclass should work where an instance
of the Superclass
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
There's no matter of breaking BC - there's no BC issues with dropping
error messages, nobody's code relies on generating fatal errors for
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
foo() is compatible with foo($a, $b) - since anywhere you can call function
declared as foo($a, $b) you can also successfully call one declared
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
Em Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:01:32 +0100, Etienne Kneuss col...@php.net
escreveu:
Sure, but you mix two things here, references would have to be handled
specifically, and we would not allow to specify less args by ref.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
Em Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:06:31 +0100, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
escreveu:
On 9/18/11 11:23 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
to tell you: I need this and that method accepting these and these
arguments to work
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
Em Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:18:50 +0100, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
escreveu:
On 9/19/11 2:12 AM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
Arbitrary as it may be, it's nevertheless reasonably arbitrated given how
little useful
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
Em Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:35:47 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com
escreveu:
could you check my second(lengthy) mail on this thread?
I also tried to come up with the valid, and invalid signature changes.
I forget
Good point, are you proposing to change code and make libmysql 5.0+ a
requirement? If so, several changes should be made to ext/mysql, ext/mysqli
and PDO_MySQL.
I think that it is your call, but yes, I think it would reasonable,
and it would make our/your work much easier if we would have to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt
wrote:
First of all, Anthony, thanks for joining into the discussion!
With respect to the func_get_args argument, I see that as a non-issue.
Sure, you can do it. But if you do, you're lying about the
interface. You're telling the callers that you expect no arguments,
but then all of a sudden you
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alan Knowles a...@akbkhome.com wrote:
Let's try and close this one.
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55475
I've just added a patch that adds is_class_of(), which is identical to
is_subclass_of, and has the new feature of supporting strings and using the
I just stumbled upon on this test as it timed out for me(my test vm
started swapping, so run-tests.php terminated after 60 sec).
I think it would be good if we could somehow check the available ram,
and skipif if it isn't enough, and I think we could also save off an
str_repeat call:
each
Derick, could you look into this?
I think that the easter_days should take the date.timezone account
when calculating a timestamp
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@php.net wrote:
tyrael Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:59:10 +
Revision: http
ext/intl/tests/dateformat_parse.phpt
seems also affected by this:
http://news.php.net/php.cvs/66617
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@php.net wrote:
Derick, could you look into this?
I think that the easter_days should take the date.timezone account
when calculating
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 9/20/11 12:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
but it is not logical
foo() in B can do anything with $a before or after parent::foo()
and the caller does not need to know at any point that B
has anything to do
Funny you mention that. I wrote an extensive email to the PEAR QA team
a month ago (http://news.php.net/php.pear.qa/5890) proposing I clean up
the PEAR CI code and that they contact PHP QA to get it running on
gcov.php.net. Alas, the people on PEAR QA team seem preoccupied with
life, so
I've just noticed that we had a related bugreport, I thought that I
should mention it:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55479
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi.
I've just found a nice feature request in the bugtracker:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=53399
what do you think about it?
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
please configure the mailing-list correct
please add a hint that modern clients have a reply-to-list
for the record, I don't have that in gmail.
please add a hint that the sender should be removed after
reply-all because internals@lists.php.net is reaching the
list AND the sender of the
2011/9/28 Ángel González keis...@gmail.com:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
well if there would be used Reply-To-Headers
tell me ONE reason to get every answer twice
I don't get two emails in gmail, I don't know that the list is smart
enough to not send emails those who are to or cc'ed, or maybe it's
there was a problem with bugs.php.net, so the captcha error was on our end.
thanks for the report
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Olivier Favre oliv...@yakaz.com wrote:
I finally managed to submit the patch... I used iceweasel 6.0.2
instead of Google Chrome 14.0.835.186... or maybe the captcha
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jan Schneider j...@horde.org wrote:
Zitat von Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com
wrote:
On 09/23/2011 12:17 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
We do 2) already (while we are working on increasing the
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 8/28/11 10:55 PM, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
I should ask someone with Zend karma to commit the closure rebinding
patch.
Context:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/closures/object-extension#privateprotected_members_scope
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi all,
...
Other examples which describes the feature at
http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call
Thoughts?
+1
Finally.
it seems that it didn't made it to the
'
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt wrote:
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:31:42 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
do we have a wiki/documentation about what exactly ended up in 5.4
from the Closure improvements? (Rebind)
https://wiki.php.net/rfc
Hi
I just read through the releaseprocess RFC(
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess ) again, and I think that the
part where we explain the Release Process and the BC could be
clarified a little bit.
(We still haven't agreed on the how many concurrent versions should we
support, how long would
- internal src compatibility
oh, thats the same as internal API compatibility, then I'm not sure
what src compatibility should be kept if possible, while breakages
are allowed is referring to, as both internals API/ABI, and userland
API is mentioned already in the rfc for the minor version.
--
2011/9/19 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 12:25 +0200, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Good point, are you proposing to change code and make libmysql 5.0+ a
requirement? If so, several changes should be made to ext/mysql, ext/mysqli
and PDO_MySQL.
I think
Hi
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote
I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
(string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
the primitive types didn't had the 66% of the votes, but the php
namespace did, so at least that should have been reserved in 5.4
already.
what is
thanks for the heads up, I didn't remembered that thread :(
btw. didn't we had some parser improvement patch laying around for a while now?
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Patrick ALLAERT patrickalla...@php.net wrote:
2011/10/8 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
Hi
https://wiki.php.net/todo
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
On 10/8/11 3:07 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I've just noticed that the php namespace and the primitive types
(string, bool, int) are still not reserved.
Reserving primitive types was decided not to be practically
hi.
on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS
I disagree with that part of your comment.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
While the stable door has already been slammed shut, I think this will be of
interest to other developers ...
Hi,
My first instinct tells me, that it was closed by mistake, as from the
first comment it could seem as the reported problem only happens if
the path given to glob is outside of open_basedir.
As the reported explained in his second comment, it is not the case,
but glob returns different result
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
on the rather one sided discussion on DVCS
I disagree with that part of your comment.
More people are already using git and are not open to changing so the
discussion was rather one sided. :( Today
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nikita,
On 9 October 2011 18:14, Nikita Popov nikita@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi list!
PHP 5.4 added array dereferencing support (e.g. `func()[1]`), but the
grammar seems to lack support for dereferencing using
Hi.
As the full unicode support went down with php6, wouldn't it be a
logical step to enable the mbstring extension by default(maybe even
turning it into a builtin ext like phar)?
I think that mbstring is a pretty mature and stable extension, and
there isn't much dependencies so I can't think of
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Following Hanness' mail a week or so ago, I went over NEWS and the wiki and
here is the list of undocumented stuff we have now in 5.4. It may be not
complete, so if you know of any other undocumented stuff please
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Harald Lapp harald.l...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i wonder if anybody out there already tried traits in more complex php
applications. i am currently trying to rewrite part of a somehow complex
application to use traits and i have the problem, that my scripts are
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
On 10/16/11 5:54 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Such a performance regression sounds like an appropriate punishment to
me for deploying bad code ;-)
By bad code you mean not obsessively checking for stuff
or E_NOTICE you are already incurring a performance hit.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
On 10/16/11 5:54 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Such a performance
Hi Stefan,
Multiple people asked me that how they can expect/check that a given object
uses a trait or not.
Of course one could write the concrete methods as a trait and always use a
given interface for typehints, but I can't see why shouldn't instanceof and
typehints in general work for traits.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
On 17 Oct 2011, at 19:41, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Multiple people asked me that how they can expect/check that a given
object uses a trait or not.
Of course one could write the concrete methods
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
On 17 Oct 2011, at 19:41, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Multiple people asked me that how they can expect/check that a given
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
Since we have next release planned on 20th, and since we have at least
three
unsolved issues for 5.4 yet which we expect resolution
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Gwynne Raskind gwy...@darkrainfall.orgwrote:
On Jul 16, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Or just to something more generic like php-commits@ ? The same with
zend-commits?
Only php-commits@ is necessary since there is no separate Zend stuff
anymore..?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jan Schneider j...@horde.org wrote:
Zitat von Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Jan Schneider j...@horde.org wrote:
Zitat von Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi Jan!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jan Schneider j...@horde.org wrote:
FWIW it seems to be more stable now since upgrading to a newer Jenkins
version.
Do you test it against php's snapshot too?
--
Pierre
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 03:53, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
Since we started to pay real attention to our unit
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hannes Magnusson
hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 03:53, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Klaus Silveira cont...@klaussilveira.comwrote:
What are the current obstacles in a possible Jenkins implementation for
the PHP codebase?
--
Klaus Silveira
(011) 8564-2492
www.klaussilveira.com
Sorry, I don't really follow you.
As I mentioned in my
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
On 03 Nov 2011, at 19:01, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Of course there are ways to improve the current setup, I listed those
ideas
at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jenkins#future_plans
Very nice.
I don't know Jenkins
301 - 400 of 1509 matches
Mail list logo
