On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi:
On 03 Nov 2011, at 20:15, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
The usual setup is that you have a mailing list/alias which always gets
a mail about the build results (which can also be customized in detail,
when to mail, etc
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Klaus Silveira cont...@klaussilveira.comwrote:
That's kind of a general setup, Stefan. Sending an email to the commiter
that broke the build with details of the build process, as well sending an
email to a mailing list.
I'll be looking into this Jenkins issue
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Felipe Pena felipe...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/3 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Klaus Silveira
cont...@klaussilveira.comwrote:
That's kind of a general setup, Stefan. Sending an email to the commiter
that broke the build
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Klaus Silveira
cont...@klaussilveira.comwrote:
Yes, it's a wonderful setup. Great work, Ferenc! :D
This does give a nice motivation to write more tests and increase the code
coverage, doesn't it?
Yes, and first of all, to fix the currently failing tests.
We
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 02:26 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
We could set up the email notification any time, we would just have to
agree where to send (internals, php-qa, creating a dedicated mailing
list?)
and when to send (as I
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 11/03/2011 03:47 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
A, it will report every test failure, but we fix all of our tests so we
are cool. (my preference)
But even if we do that, when a test does fail, it may take a couple
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi:
On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I almost forget to mention, but the email notification also supports
defining different recipients for each event, so for example the commiters
could still get
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi:
On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I almost forget to mention, but the email notification also supports
defining different
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, André Rømcke a...@ez.no wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
Paul,
I wasn't saying whether it should be included or not. I was saying
that performance should not be a justification for it being included.
my comments are also inline
did you read the blogpost? most of your replies were cowered there.
Yes.
you mean you or André?
If you use lowerCamelCase on the class names or your namespace, it will
(/should) be exactly like on disk as well.
So as previously said, it just
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi:
On 04 Nov 2011, at 00:12, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
I almost forget
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Hannes Magnusson bj...@php.net wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:42, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed that the mail will be sent on each configuration build
(debian 32bit, debian 64bit, freebsd 32bit, freebsd 64bit), which is of
course
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
We have the following issues which I'd really like to put behind us before
RC (please correct me if they already were resolved):
1. is_a issue - did we resolve it? If not - does anyone have a proper
patch and
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
On 03 Nov 2011, at 19:01, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Of course there are ways to improve the current setup, I listed those
ideas
at https
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hey Derick:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:15:48PM +, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote:
2. DateTime fixes with TLA timezones
Please remind me the issue number?
I
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
On 03 Nov 2011, at 19:01, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Of course
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa
ivan.ender...@hoa-project.net wrote:
On 07/11/11 19:17, Lester Caine wrote:
guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
To participate of php-standards group, feel free to join here:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
Ferenc,
It's great to have this running. Some thoughts are:
1. Where are the 'configure' options output? I would have expected
the View Build Information link on
e.g.
2011/11/8 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 00:24 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
3,
As I mentioned in the RFC, for now, we only set up the default exts,
but as
I mentioned in the RFC, the next step would be to enable as much as we
can.
locally I have VMs
2011/11/8 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 01:18 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
Might also be nice to build (PECL) extensions as sub-tasks, so if
they
fail they don't cause the whole build to fail, but just a single red
light between many green (or blue
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Stefan Marr p...@stefan-marr.de wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Dirk Haun d...@haun-online.de wrote:
Quoting Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
There is only three failing tests left on the debian slaves:
For 5.3
ext/phar/tests/phar_oo_005.**phpt.Phar and RecursiveDirectoryIterator
0.01 20
ext/spl/tests/bug60082.phpt
Hi.
As it was brought up recently that who can vote, and how are the community
representatives granted with voting rights, I created an RFC draft for
defining that-
Please feel free to discuss and extend it.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting_who
ps: it is really just a draft put together in like 5
I think that this isn't a good idea. The main reason for a [php-src]
vs. [php-doc et al.] distinction is that the php-src guys will be the
ones maintaining the code. (At least from what I heard this is the
main point.)
I have more argument than that, maybe there are others also:
- The core
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:01 AM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com
guilhermebla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals,
I won't enter on this thread of Who can vote, but I'll get around it
during the exposure of my point of view. I may also point to
individual RFCs that were either accepted/rejected or
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi Stas,
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
This attitude only makes me lose a lot of time answering questions
instead of focusing on actual RFC stability. I want to
maybe someone else would be also interested in fixing the build.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-CVS] svn: /php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_4/ NEWS
ext/standard/exec.c ext/standard/tests/general_functions
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com
wrote:
On 11/10/2011 10:38 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com
wrote:
We are not talking
Hi.
I mentioned this before, and I remembered yesterday when David updated the
README.RELEASE_PROCESS:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=319009 :
Currently bugs.php.net uses the qa.php.net api to decide which PHP branch
are active, so what version should be listed for the
here to work on that, and certainly since 2 weeks.
Cheers,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I mentioned this before, and I remembered yesterday when David updated
the
README.RELEASE_PROCESS:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Florian Anderiasch m...@anderiasch.dewrote:
Hey there,
I just noticed some inconsistencies in svn usernames used in
SVNROOT/global_avail.
After some shell magic involving sed,grep and diff these names don't match
the 1607 people on master, as of a few
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 13.11.2011 16:11, schrieb Laruence:
Hi:
this revisioin remove the ob_* functions:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=299980
is this intentional? if yes, I think this will become a doc
Hi.
We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the
http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sqlite
instead.
Is that intentional?
The problem is, that for 5.3, the prefered way to use the sqlite ext is to
use the one bundled in core, however for 5.4 and trunk, you
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:51:25 +0100, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
As per rfc6265, it seems incorrect:
Servers SHOULD NOT include more than one Set-Cookie header field in
the same response with the same cookie-name.
@mike
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Felipe Pena felipe...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/16 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
Hi.
We moved the sqlite ext from core to pecl with 5.4, but the
http://pecl.php.net/package/sqlite still advertises using ext/sqlite
instead.
Is that intentional
\o/
You could also ask Alex Shein, he was volunteered to update the http
tests to use our new embedded developer server instead.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Klaus Silveira klaussilve...@php.netwrote:
I'll try to help Laruence improve the test coverage. If you guys have any
suggestion for
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Alexey Shein con...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/17 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
\o/
You could also ask Alex Shein, he was volunteered to update the http
tests
to use our new embedded developer server instead.
Hi, I'm still into that, but unfortunately
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Alexey Shein con...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/17 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Alexey Shein con...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/17 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com:
\o/
You could also ask Alex Shein, he was volunteered
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
2011/11/16 Philip Olson phi...@roshambo.org:
We need to make pecl/sqlite work with 5.4, as currently it does not.
Why? We moved it out because it is not maintained anymore. As I agree
that the concept of move to
Hi Matthew, my replies are inline
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney
weierophin...@php.net wrote:
Greetings!
My team and I (which means Ralph Schindler and Enrico Zimuel) took some
time this week to:
* Build PHP 5.4.0RC1 and run make tests (and send feedback)
*
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Richard Quadling rquadl...@gmail.comwrote:
On 18 November 2011 13:31, Felipe Pena felipe...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/18 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
same here, and for any other places in the ob_* APIs. Functions
returns false on error, cleaning
2011/11/17 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
Just to make one thing clear: To the best of my knowledge the module
works with 5.4 and trunk (it's three months since I tested, but I'm not
aware of a recent big API break) only defect is that the PDO sqlite2
driver won't be there and can't
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Ralph Schindler
ra...@ralphschindler.comwrote:
Maintenance of the Phar extension (bug fixing, documentation fixes, etc)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I know I don't really have
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
open a bug (doc bug) and add it to the TODOs, so it won't be forgotten.
done:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60336
https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
this patch has been applied by Stas.
I see the commit, and that reminded me replying to his request.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
However there's a little problem. The new interface reports errors via the
usual ICU mechanism AND it also uses a new structure to pass IDNA specific
errors. Also, it reports whether the use of the transitional mechanism
affects the result. So I see only two solutions so that that extra
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Christopher Jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/22/2011 02:51 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
It will save much time if I don't have to write wiki for rfc.
Please add at least the contents of your email to an RFC so there is
some description that
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Ferenc,
I can login to wiki, but cannot write to the page.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict_sessions
Could you update the page with attached file?
Thank you.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Sure,
Hannes, could you please give
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Etienne Kneuss wrote:
AFAIK this is one of the change that was explicitly put in to make it
more consistent.
But now it breaks code in the wild. I came across this due to an
isset() in PEAR now passing when it
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Technically, yes, it is possible. But is it desirable? It would require
breaking the abstraction and looking at the actual values of the flags,
choosing one of the unused bits (possibly a high one) and hope
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I thought that we already agreed using an output argument for getting
the specific error instead of returning either a string or an array.
That's what I was thinking too, but Gustavo seems to plan to do
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I thought that we already agreed using an output argument for getting
the specific error instead of returning either a string
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
some clarification:
in the test script, Daniel declared $arr as:
$arr = array('exists' = 'foo');
so when he tests
$arr['exists']['non_existent']
PHP will see that $arr['exists'] is a string
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
2011/11/23 Hannes Magnusson bj...@php.net:
He has svn account.
If you login with your svn credentials you'll have full write karma to
everything on the wiki.
If you don't remember your password;
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Stas:
It's actually very simple. Take variable $a which is a string
(foo). Now it you do $a[0] that would produce first letter - f.
Now here's a tricky part - if you do $a['blah'] it would
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Gustavo Lopes glo...@nebm.ist.utl.ptwrote:
Em Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:19:42 -, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com
escreveu:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Daniel Convissor
danielc@analysisandsolutions.**com dani...@analysisandsolutions.com
wrote:
It's
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Ferenc:
[And the manual sys...]
Non-integer types are converted to integer.
So it is a documented behavior, so the current change is just a bugfix
imo.
Can someone please lend me their time
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Again Folks:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 09:14:09AM -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
$a = 'foo';
echo $a['blah'] . \n;
But that second one echos out f. This is a huge WTF.
Two things for the
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
On 11/23/11 6:14 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
To me, this is the bug. $a['blah'] does not exist. An undefined index
If it's a bug, this bug was in PHP since forever, nothing new here.
notice should be
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
Unless I'm mistaken it seems that we have a clear and vicious BC break
here, the kind of changes that are annoying to catch and does not
No, we do not have a BC break here, we have a bugfix here that makes
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I have been using news.php.net ML archive a couple of times lately, and I
must say unfortunately it's not the best ML archive I have seen around. No
search, no indexing by date/topic, references are sometimes
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:38 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/11/11 06:25, Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
The only case where the 5.4 branch works differently as before if you
reference a string type(int, float, etc. won't trigger this) variable
using an associative index and
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:41 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/11/11 12:44, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:38 AM, David Muir davidkm...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, the changes introduced in 5.4 will result in the
following:
?php
$string = 'foo
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Stas Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
That would help a lot ... this is not a problem of so the developer can
fix his
code but rather so we can fix legacy code which other non-developers are
currently using happily ... If *I*
It gives me false in 5.3.6. Using it outside of isset() results in the
fatal error.
hm.
tyrael@thor:~$ php -r '$string =
foo;isset($string[foo][bar][baz][0]);';
PHP Fatal error: Cannot use string offset as an array in Command line
code on line 1
tyrael@thor:~$ php -v
PHP
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:05 AM, de...@lucato.it wrote:
On 24 November 2011 01:38, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
But neither is introducing a potential bomb of the kind that the 'date'
saga
created. The problem this change IS causing is likely to hit many live
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Ford, Mike m.f...@leedsmet.ac.uk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gustavo Lopes [mailto:glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt]
Sent: 23 November 2011 22:31
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:06:09 -, Pierre Joye
pierre@gmail.com
wrote:
The fact that we
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:04 PM, de...@lucato.it wrote:
Thanks Ferenc
Everything looks ok http://codepad.viper-7.com/JTXsGK
Devis
here are the corner cases:
5.3: http://codepad.viper-7.com/nPLorU
5.4: http://codepad.viper-7.com/MUdAlc
as you can see from the 4th example, your test will
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.comwrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:13 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Richard Quadling wrote:
I agree with Daniel on this.
Just looking for any test relating to isset() to see what tests will
now fail.
So it's not just me :)
I am
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi all,
I should think twice before seding mail. abc as array index is
converted to 0 since it's not a integer. So with current code is
behave consistently with regards to string to long conversion.
However,
PHP 5.3
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 11/24/2011 01:44 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hi all,
I should think twice before seding mail. abc as array index is
converted to 0 since it's not a integer. So with current code is
behave consistently with
Isn't it better to raise notice for accessing string by string index?
There is no use to allowing string index access to strings. I think
raising notice is feasible. Isn't it?
String index access is still required since they are often numeric
strings. We could add a notice for
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.comwrote:
On 11/24/2011 02:58 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Larry
Garfieldlarry@garfieldtech.**comla...@garfieldtech.com
wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:13 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
Richard Quadling
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Rasmus:
Yes, no change in any of that. In your usage, the case that behaves
differently in 5.4 was actually a fatal error in 5.3, so chances are
pretty good you don't have too many of these.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Convissor
dani...@analysisandsolutions.com wrote:
Hi Anthony:
isset($foo['bar'][1]['baz']) is_array($foo['bar'][1])
You don't need to check each level. Only the one above the key you're
looking at.
Excellent thinking. One hitch... that goes
The problem with fatal, that you have no way (by the standard means, but
you can somehow manage it through the usage of output buffers or
register_shutdown_function, but thats ugly, and can change in the future)
to intercept and gracefully terminate your application, which is an often
needed
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Sebastian Krebs
krebs@googlemail.comwrote:
2011/11/25 Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com
The problem with fatal, that you have no way (by the standard means, but
you can somehow manage it through the usage of output buffers or
register_shutdown_function
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.comwrote:
I surround my application with a try/catch block to catch uncaught
exceptions. An autoloader exception could be one of them.
But I use also similar calls to reformat error messages.
try {
$class = new
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.comwrote:
Am 25.11.2011 13:13, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Christian Kaps
christian.k...@mohiva.com**wrote:
I surround my application with a try/catch block to catch uncaught
exceptions
Yesterday we were talking about enabling more extensions and adding pecl
into the mix:
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54220.html
I think it would be a good idea to try to fix the currently failing tests.
http://ci.qa.php.net/job/php-src-5.3-matrix-tests/35/testReport/?
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I mentioned this before, and I remembered yesterday when David updated the
README.RELEASE_PROCESS:
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=319009 :
Currently bugs.php.net uses the qa.php.net api to decide
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently writing a shared extension thta depends on another shared
extension (igbinary). make test doesn't handle this at the moment,
because it removes every extension= line from it's temporary php.ini.
This
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 28 November 2011 13:36, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net
2011/11/28 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 15:18 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
+ foreach ($extensions as $req_ext) {
+ $loaded = `$php -n -r 'echo (int) extension_loaded($req_ext);'`;
+ if ($loaded == '0') {
This should use the tmp-php.ini as that might
Hannes, I could edit the page once, but save button is disabled for
some reason. Could you check my karma? Thank you.
you have to either provide a comment for the wiki change or check the Minor
Changes checkbox to be allowed to save your work.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
Hi,
Recent activity:
Alexey Shein dug through the failing symfony2 tests, and it turned out that
3 tests were bugged, he went ahead and fixed it (
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/pull/2750), one from the other two is a
sporadic test, it can fail randomly, the last one fails in our specific
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2011/12/2 Daniel K. d...@uw.no:
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2011/12/2 Daniel K. d...@uw.no:
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
2011/12/2 Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net:
Search for a + followed by only tabs or
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi,
On 26/11/2011 01:05, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
FreeBSD:
As I mentioned previously, the IO perf is really bad for those two vm's,
so
if we can't find a solution, or other place to run those, I will have to
turn
hi,
see
http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=224572
and
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/pecl/apc/trunk/TECHNOTES.txt?r1=224572r2=224571pathrev=224572
especially
it seems that it doesn't work out, and it was removed.
So I'm pretty sure, that we won't see that option in the future. If the
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Alan Knowles a...@akbkhome.com wrote:
I've had a look at making string offsets of strings a bit saner.
At present with the fix for array dereferencing : ?search=hello and a
test like isset($_GET['search']['name']) results in true, which is has
potential
2011/12/4 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 00:08 +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
This patch is a start.
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug_id=60362patch=first_effort_to_fix_thisrevision=latest
It's been quite a while since I hacked on the engine, so the
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:27 PM, James Edmunds relea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am new to this list and I am wondering if this is the appropriate place
to ask a question about the internals for an extension, or is there a more
appropriate list for that purpose? My issue is fairly
Laruence, I think that there is no point opening a thread if you will go
ahead and commit after waiting 3 hours and 0 replies.
Or did I miss someting here?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hi:
I update the patch, instead of change the behavior of zbacktrace,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:12 PM, David Soria Parra d...@php.net wrote:
Hi Internals,
three months ago we decided to move PHP to Git. I want to give you
an update what happend so far and what we are working on.
So far we have:
1. A working import from php-src.
2. A basic server setup.
scalar type hinting was rejected in the past multiple times.
I think that expanding this RFC (against the wish of the original author of
the RFC) would be a sure way to guarantee the same result for this RFC as
well..
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Keloran ava...@gmail.com wrote:
i would love
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Dmitri Snytkine
dsnytk...@ultralogistics.com wrote:
Odd how substring can be used as index of string.
oh, I see where the confusion comes from.
the reason why foobar[foo] returns 'f' isn't that foo is a substring
of foobar, but that foo will be casted to int,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dmitri Snytkine
dsnytk...@ultralogistics.com wrote:
No sure who can and cannot vote, I don't see any way for me to vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting
currently the following two groups can vote:
- people having php.net svn account
- people having a wiki
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Patrick ALLAERT patrickalla...@php.netwrote:
2011/12/27 Ilia Alshanetsky i...@ilia.ws:
The change is inside 5.4 version which adjust breaks BC.
I don't follow you here Ilia.
As per https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess:
* Backward compatibility must be
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Keloran ava...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont seem to have the karma for doing this in RFC so ill propose it here,
and once karma make an RFC
Is it possible to have a 2nd option on file_exists so that it returns the
path you specified
--Example
$cFile =
401 - 500 of 1509 matches
Mail list logo
