On Dec 4, 2007 10:36 PM, Robert Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:26 -0600, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Derick Rethans wrote:
4. What is wrong with simple prefixes in the first place? Both PEAR_*,
Zend_*, ezc*, and ezp* are perfectly
On Dec 5, 2007 12:04 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
collision problems that class naming and function naming have. Only
Only if you insist on *not* using the namespaces to solve collision
problems. For the 1001th time - you can not expect to put all names into
global space
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about just silently converting newline to '\n' and tab to '\t',
etc. I mean if you cant put those characters in a string, who will
notice? or better, just use a single-quoted string.
Random programmer here, but I really
My personal favorite use of Reflection is Class Factories. While this
could be done with:
?php
$className = 'Util';
$obj = new $className();
?
It seems a little blunt to me, it also doesn't support having a
variable number of arguments to the constructor. I've seen some
pretty egregious
2009/7/30 Alexey Zakhlestin indey...@gmail.com
2009/7/30 Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
instances in array_* functions?
If you all agreed on this, I can
On 8/26/07, Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First make sure you understand what safe_mode does, and doesn't do,
and just how lame it is at what it tried to do, and fails to do, and
simply cannot do.
I am all for the removal of safe mode in php. I use safe_mode now,
but I patch it to
Unless there is some other way in PHP of restricting where you can run
programs from (can't find any),
Why PHP needs to do that ? isnt that part of OS level security ?
There are those of us in shared environments where scripts can't be
run as a single user because the content is owned by
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.comwrote:
The challenge of never use extend is that simply wrapping classes in
decorators only goes so far. You can't always maintain interface
compliance
if you're nesting decorators, and if you're overriding only one out of
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.com
wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 10:05:39 pm Eric Stewart wrote:
+1 For shorter release cycles. Shorter release cycles could also allow
us
to
Firstly, I'm not here to debate the merits or the how-to of serializing
closures. I'm here to address the current usability issues with how it is
prevented. The short background of what I'm doing is serializing backtraces
when errors occur so that I can better diagnose bugs my clients report.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
Hi!
prevented. The short background of what I'm doing is serializing
backtraces
when errors occur so that I can better diagnose bugs my clients report.
But
when a closure is passed as a function parameter
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Etienne Kneuss webmas...@colder.ch wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Moriyoshi Koizumi m...@mozo.jp wrote:
Hey,
Just to let you know about a new RFC for adding autoboxing feature in
PHP.
Look at http://wiki.php.net/rfc/autoboxing .
It looks
12 matches
Mail list logo
