You have to build an xmlNodeSet by hand.
The DOMNodeList class wraps many different types of data to iterate
(HastTables, xmlHashTables, nodeIterators, notationIterator, etc...).
Everything works on live data so no xmlNodeSets are used since those are
static. The iterators all work directly on
Hi Chegru
-Original Message-
I'm currently trying to add the Canonicalization functionality, but
since I'm not a C expert, it takes a while :)
Shouldn't be to hard, if your talking about the functions described at
http://xmlsoft.org/html/libxml-c14n.html
That's indeed what
On 14.2.2005 23:42 Uhr, David Kingma | jool.nl wrote:
Hi Chegru
-Original Message-
I'm currently trying to add the Canonicalization functionality, but
since I'm not a C expert, it takes a while :)
Shouldn't be to hard, if your talking about the functions described at
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Adam,
ok, you propose a function to prepare the doc comments for further
processing. While this seems a good idea at first glance it is not
that easy as you typed it. The problem is that there are different
tags some of which stop at the next tag, some are just valid
Trachtenberg
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Kingma | jool.nl; 'Andi Gutmans'; 'Sean
Coates'; 'Ante Drnasin'; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Autoboxing in php 5.1
Hello Adam,
ok, you propose a function to prepare the doc comments for further
processing. While this seems a good
Hello Johannes,
Saturday, February 12, 2005, 11:39:30 PM, you wrote:
[...]
While writing this mail I did some deeper look on the getDocComment stuff and
found that my it doesn't work example[2] was the only case it doesn't work
- just adding some statement behind the comment frees the
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Kingma | jool.nl; 'Andi Gutmans'; 'Sean
Coates'; 'Ante Drnasin'; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Autoboxing in php 5.1
Hello Adam,
ok, you propose a function to prepare the doc comments for further
processing. While this seems a good idea at first
-Original Message-
Can't you use the reflection API to get the data?
Not yet. My first feature request would be to add a getDocComment() to the
ReflectionProperty class. You can generate a WSDL file using the reflection
API but for the xml-schema part of the wsdl file you have to
I think the right way to implement this is in a development tools. There is
other data that needs to be gathered for creating a WSDL file such as URI,
authentication (if required) etc.
Andi
At 12:54 PM 2/12/2005 +0100, David Kingma | jool.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
Can't you use the
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:35:09 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andi Gutmans) wrote:
I think the right way to implement this is in a development tools.
There is other data that needs to be gathered for creating a WSDL
file such as URI, authentication (if required) etc.
I agree here. However having a:
On Feb 12, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think the right way to implement this is in a development tools.
There is other data that needs to be gathered for creating a WSDL file
such as URI, authentication (if required) etc.
Seems silly to have to use a development tool to do this. On
Hello David,
did i miss something?
ReflectionClass::getDocComment() should be pretty fine.
marcus
Saturday, February 12, 2005, 12:54:28 PM, you wrote:
-Original Message-
Can't you use the reflection API to get the data?
Not yet. My first feature request would be to add a
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:26:06 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Schlossnagle) wrote:
On Feb 12, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think the right way to implement this is in a development
tools. There is other data that needs to be gathered for
creating a WSDL file such as URI,
Creating WSDL files in Java is usually done by the development tools.
At 12:26 PM 2/12/2005 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Feb 12, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think the right way to implement this is in a development tools. There
is other data that needs to be gathered for
Hello Johannes,
ups, reading again i see it, it was ReflectionProperty::getDocComment()
Johannes had a patch for that already and i asked for it some months ago
but i don't remember if there was anything against it.
marcus
Saturday, February 12, 2005, 6:45:22 PM, you wrote:
Hello David,
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
ups, reading again i see it, it was ReflectionProperty::getDocComment()
There's a generic getDocComment() method, but that just returns the
entire blob. You then need to parse the blog using the preg functions
to extract individual lines. It would be
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 12:57, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Creating WSDL files in Java is usually done by the development tools.
And one of the major benefits to SOAP in .NET is that it is done
completely by the core.
John
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hi Marcus,
On Saturday 12 February 2005 18:58, Marcus Boerger wrote:
ups, reading again i see it, it was ReflectionProperty::getDocComment()
Johannes had a patch for that already and i asked for it some months ago
but i don't remember if there was anything against it.
no, the
John Coggeshall wrote:
To be clear:
Although I think this might be implemented as some sort of object I am
not interested in making objects out of everything. All I want is this:
function foo(Integer $a, Float $b, String $c, Boolean $d) {
}
and be able to introspect against that... how that
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into
the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex
signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway.
We will need to have a way to document web services so that we can
auto-generate WSDL
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into
the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex
signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway.
We will need to have a way to document web services so that we can
Hello Sean,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 7:33:11 PM, you wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into
the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex
signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway.
We
John Coggeshall wrote:
I am only arguing the typehinting of primitives.
I would like to see typehinting for primitives, too.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP
At 10:33 AM 2/11/2005 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
John Coggeshall wrote:
I am only arguing the typehinting of primitives.
I would like to see typehinting for primitives, too.
Read the archives. There are good reasons why this wouldn't fit into PHP
and the way it auto-juggles types.
Andi
At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into
the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex
signatures and this kind of syntax won't be sufficient anyway.
We will need to have a
Hello Andi,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:16 PM, you wrote:
At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start going into
the web services realm we're going to need to document more complex
signatures and this
Can't you use the reflection API to get the data?
At 11:19 PM 2/11/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Andi,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:51:16 PM, you wrote:
At 01:33 PM 2/11/2005 -0500, Sean Coates wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think phpDoc is the solution because especially as we start
Hello Andi,
you can but that would be different. You somehow have to know then what is
there to parse and you couldn't write something like 'phpdoc' that requires
correct syntax for both code and comment.
marcus
Friday, February 11, 2005, 11:23:40 PM, you wrote:
Can't you use the reflection
Man, that's the primary reason I don't like Java :)
You can't be serious :)
Ron
Ante Drnasin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Hi Marcus and thanx for the explanation
And I agree that PHP is very
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Hi Marcus and thanx for the explanation
And I agree that PHP is very loose which is his strong part but
exactly because of that I think it would be nice if the end-user can have
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Why?
- Andrei
Why not?
Because it would be a great asset to the new OOP model in PHP 5
You did't answer my question. Why?
Because the new OOP model is great and I don't think it shouldn't stop
there
Why?
Because it would be great
You did't answer my question. Why?
I am def. a fan of this idea. I'd love to see internally a set of
Java-style objects representing the basic types in PHP.
As for why I have two reasons:
Although PHP is not a strongly-typed language and never will be, with
the introduction of type-hinting I
To be clear:
Although I think this might be implemented as some sort of object I am
not interested in making objects out of everything. All I want is this:
function foo(Integer $a, Float $b, String $c, Boolean $d) {
}
and be able to introspect against that... how that ultimately gets
function foo(Integer $a, Float $b, String $c, Boolean $d) {
}
Having that automagically translate to:
function foo($a, $b, $c, $d) {
set_type($a, 'int');
set_type($b, 'float');
set_type($c, 'string');
set_type($d, 'bool');
}
Is something that I could see building into the language
Is something that I could see building into the language (in all honesty,
isn't that was zend_parse_parameters does for internal functions already?),
but objects for primitives? Didn't someone say something about smelly
corpses recently? maybe it was charred? cold? smoking? rank?
I don't
Is something that I could see building into the language (in all honesty,
isn't that was zend_parse_parameters does for internal functions
already?),
but objects for primitives? Didn't someone say something about smelly
corpses recently? maybe it was charred? cold? smoking? rank?
I don't
John Coggeshall wrote:
object and maintain that WSDL alongside code changes manually? WSDL
documents were designed to be generated automatically by the
architecture exposing the web service, and without any notion of typing
in PHP at all there is no viable way to really do this.
Don't forget about
At 09:08 AM 2/10/2005 +0100, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Why not?
Because it would be a great asset to the new OOP model in PHP 5
Because the new OOP model is great and I don't think it shouldn't stop
there
Because it would be great if the choice is left to the end user...
We already have OOP
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:
The best thing internals could do for WSDL is to add a documentation
lexer to reflection, but I would be surprised if this happens - too
complicated unless it's really crude :)
I did something like this using getDocComment() and preg_match() for
I was wondering if anyone can comment on this idea
cause I think it would be a great asset to PHP and to OOP in PHP..
example:
$b = 4;
$a = new Integer(4);
if($a == $b) {
//bla bla
}
Other classes would include String(), Integer(), Boolean() ... and so on...
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
Hello Ante,
autoboxing is an ugly java 1.5 workarount to enable storage of base
tyoes in containers. There this trick is necessary because as always
in java everything must be an 'Object'. In contrast PHP is a loosly
typed language where a container aka array can store any type. Apart
from that
Hi Marcus and thanx for the explanation
And I agree that PHP is very loose which is his strong part but
exactly because of that I think it would be nice if the end-user can have
the ability to work with primitives like they were objects...
I didn't want to suggest that PHP should implement
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Ante Drnasin wrote:
Hi Marcus and thanx for the explanation
And I agree that PHP is very loose which is his strong part but
exactly because of that I think it would be nice if the end-user can have
the ability to work with primitives like they were objects...
Why?
43 matches
Mail list logo
