Derick Rethans wrote:
It won't bork all scripts with a custom errorhandler if their default
action is to ignore core and other errors but only handle the ones they
should handle. I do agree that it should be mentioned in the changes
file though.
On the other hand you have to be very careful
At 07:20 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
It won't bork all scripts with a custom errorhandler if their default
action is to ignore core and other errors but only handle the ones they
should handle. I do agree that it should be mentioned in the changes
file
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the handler if
they are off?
So you're suggesting to add another BC break here, without a really
good reason? :)
At 10:24 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the handler if
they are off?
So you're suggesting to add another
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:24 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the handler if
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:24 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called
for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the
handler if
they are off?
So you're
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:35, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:20 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
It won't bork all scripts with a custom errorhandler if their default
action is to ignore core and other errors but only handle the ones they
should handle. I do
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 22:56, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 10:24 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
In any case, I do think that the custom error handler being called for any
error is bogus. Why should E_STRICT or E_NOTICES be sent to the handler
Stig S. Bakken wrote:
Good question. Having an error handling function becomes really
expensive if your code is not E_ALL-clean in a loop or something.
if you set a custom error handler you know what you are doing
and probably don't have such places in the code :)
IMHO the error_reporting
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
Anyway, I'm holding off with Beta 3 until we fix the
--install-pear-packages problem. I'd call that a showstopper because it's
something pretty basic.
Has anyone managed to create a reproducing script or backtrace?
It doesn't crash on my box :(
10 matches
Mail list logo
