On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would this imply dropping the object?
This:
$foo = (new bar())-someSetter();
Looks a lot better than this
$foo = new bar();
$foo-someSetter();
The second version is much clearer. You know
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:05:14PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would this imply dropping the object?
This:
$foo = (new bar())-someSetter();
Looks a lot better than this
$foo = new bar();
I also think that:
$foo = (new bar())-someSetter();
someSetter() could return $this, although unlikely. The result of the line
above would be that the bar object is garbage collected after being created
method someSetter() invoked. To keep it one would have to do:
In very rare
On Tue, January 19, 2010 10:20 am, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com
wrote:
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of
exotic -
why create object only to call one method and immediately drop it?
Why this
method
On 01/19/2010 01:27 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a small patch that enables this kind of syntax in PHP:
foo()();
I'd rather see two other things that are missing, support for
dynamic object and array de-referencing like
(new class)-method() and get_array()[index].
I honestly
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 01/19/2010 01:27 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a small patch that enables this kind of syntax in PHP:
foo()();
I'd rather see two other things that are missing, support for
dynamic object and array
2010/1/19 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Michael Wallner m...@php.net wrote:
On 01/19/2010 01:27 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a small patch that enables this kind of syntax in PHP:
foo()();
I'd rather see two other things that are missing,
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 12:31 +0100, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 01/19/2010 01:27 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a small patch that enables this kind of syntax in PHP:
foo()();
I think that becomes hard to read quite easily.
I'd rather see two other things that are
I'd rather see two other things that are missing, support for
dynamic object and array de-referencing like
(new class)-method() and get_array()[index].
I honestly don't see func()()()() make anything better in the
world of a PHP programmer.
The array de-referencing and dynamic objects are much
Hi!
I'd rather see two other things that are missing, support for
dynamic object and array de-referencing like
(new class)-method() and get_array()[index].
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of
exotic - why create object only to call one method and immediately
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of exotic -
why create object only to call one method and immediately drop it? Why this
method is not static then?
Why would this imply dropping the
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of exotic -
why create object only to call one method and immediately drop it? Why this
method is not static then?
Why would this
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of exotic -
why create object only to call one method and
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of exotic
-
why create object only
On Tue, January 19, 2010 10:05 am, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I'd rather see two other things that are missing, support for
dynamic object and array de-referencing like
(new class)-method() and get_array()[index].
The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of
Hi!
When I use one, I consider it exotic/obtuse/unusual enough to require
self-documenting code, with a temp variable whose name include
'closure'.
By use I meant not use it so rarely that it's an exotic hack for me
that I have to explain what I did here, I mean write code that relies
on
16 matches
Mail list logo
