On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
No, goahead :)
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
The are not defined.
They are open (or closed but not freed yet).
You probably meant get_defined_resorce_types()
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Anyone objects about it
Hello Dmitry,
On 20.08.2014 12:08, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
To have a robust way to detect resource leaks I propose a new
function -
get_resources() that returns an array of all registered resources or
an
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
Hi!
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
For the function get_resources, the proto says it has no arguments, but
it actually has one S argument that is
done.
Dmitry.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it.
For the
Hi,
Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch, but
the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
wrong assumption.
Resource leaks can't be caught using get_memory_usage().
To have a robust
hi,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch, but
the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
wrong
Hey:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch, but
the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
wrong
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
10 matches
Mail list logo
