On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I sent an email last year about this issue, but it got sidetracked (partly
it was my fault):
http://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg54267.html
So this time, I would like focusing only on the
Did you experiment with any options?
Putting the date of your O+ snapshot would also be handy.
Latest from here are used:
http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/snaps/Optimizer/7.0.0-dev/
Dates are included. It would be nice to have it in the report as well,
but we always use latest
-Original Message-
From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM
To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov
Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Current Status of O+ on Windows
Did you experiment with any
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ferenc Kovacs [mailto:tyr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:15 AM
To: Pierre Joye; Dmitry Stogov
Cc: Christopher Jones; Matt Ficken; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re:
+1 s, Switch to a new opcode cacher is much easier than update PHP,
and ZO+ is already compatible with 5.5. we could use ZO+ as soon as possible.
--
reeze | reeze.cn
已使用 Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
在 2013年3月2日星期六，下午4:43，Ferenc Kovacs 写道：
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:39 AM,
On 02/03/13 08:39, Zeev Suraski wrote:
The current vote that's going on right now deals with putting the extension
into PHP itself. If that happens (which seems awfully likely at this
point), why do we need it in PECL?
My response to your Q is that there is probably going to be quite a lot
of
At what point is O+ reporting going to be possible through
https://bugs.php.net/ ?
I realize that this is a bit of a catch-22, but surely it would be
better to allow properly tracked open bug reporting sooner rather later?
Regards Terry
Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net
project so it makes little sense to have it listed there.
On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk wrote:
At what point is O+ reporting going to be possible through
https://bugs.php.net/ ?
I realize
Maybe the time has come for the adoption of some actual bylaws which
succintly state who merits voting privileges and who may propose an RFC. If
one reads 2.II.a of https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto, that document indicates
that the ability to propose an RFC does not automatically confer one with
On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote:
Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a
PHP.net project so it makes little sense to have it listed there.
On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk
mailto:te...@ellisons.org.uk wrote:
At what point is
On 3/2/13 3:19 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
On 02/03/13 09:34, Pierre Joye wrote:
Having it in peck right now allows that. But as of now it is not a PHP.net
project so it makes little sense to have it listed there.
On Mar 2, 2013 10:33 AM, Terry Ellison te...@ellisons.org.uk
I want to help out with bug handling (as Rasmus indicated on IRC)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
VCS Account Approved: dlsniper approved by rasmus \o/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 2013-02-27, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
On 27 2013, at 18:58, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Zeev et al,
I just want to put my justification for the only if no delay vote. I voted
that way because we're already at a significant delay. If this vote was a
month ago
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:18 AM, PHP Group gr...@php.net wrote:
rasmus approved ardbiesheuvel account request \o/
Are you a different guy from abies (with an @ewi.tudelft.nl address)?
Credited as the author of Firebird/InterBase driver for PDO Interbase...
The abies account is still active..
On 02/03/13 17:42, Christopher Jones wrote:
I realize that this is a bit of a catch-22, but surely it would be
better to allow properly tracked open bug reporting sooner rather
later?
Bugs can (and have been) reported via
https://github.com/zend-dev/ZendOptimizerPlus/issues
On 3 March 2013 07:48, Hannes Magnusson hannes.magnus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:18 AM, PHP Group gr...@php.net wrote:
rasmus approved ardbiesheuvel account request \o/
Are you a different guy from abies (with an @ewi.tudelft.nl address)?
Credited as the author of
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
Based on the overwhelming response, the vote is now open J
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/optimizerplus
Voting ends March 7th.
ok, given the total lack
Hi!
I've reviewed the pull 267 and it seems to be finally ready, at least I
can't see any problem with it. Is 5.5 still open for adding
self-contained functions or should it remain in master?
Thanks,
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext.
hi Zeev,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
ok, given the total lack of answers, mistakes and misleading wording
in the RFC and lack of releases in PECL (which is a pre requise since
quite some time to get in core), I'd to vote -1 for now.
+1,
there should
How Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP can be remotely related to the
available of o+ via PECL?
Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched
to the active vote, but it used to read 'Don't integrate Optimizer+ to
PHP, release only in PECL'. My bad.
Zeev
--
PHP
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
How Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP can be remotely related to the
available of o+ via PECL?
Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched
to the active vote, but it used to read 'Don't integrate
On 03/02/2013 11:25 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
How Don't integrate Optimizer+ to PHP can be remotely related to the
available of o+ via PECL?
Actually it seems as if some of the original text got lost when I switched
to the active
23 matches
Mail list logo
