Dear Thiago,
Thank you very much for your answer. The only thing that concerns me is
that "The project is experimental at the moment and APIs provided are
work in progress and subject to changes." so since as far as I
understand this is not an IoTivity component, is it compatible only with
ce
Hey Gregg,
IoTivity immediately came to mind first time I heard of Bazel. The
remote caching would be a huge win as hopefully it would bring out build
times back down to <15 minutes for Linux. And the way they do external
dependency[1] management I expect would save developers a lot of time,
and p
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 2:44 PM Trevor Bramwell
wrote:
> Hey Gregg,
>
> IoTivity immediately came to mind first time I heard of Bazel. The
> remote caching would be a huge win as hopefully it would bring out build
> times back down to <15 minutes for Linux.
Thought you might like that bit.
And t
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 2:59 PM Gregg Reynolds wrote:
>
> Not that a Bazel
>
Make that "Note that "
___
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 2:44 PM Trevor Bramwell
wrote:
...
> I noticed you started a bit
> of this work[2]
Also, that's no longer experimental; OpenOCF now uses Bazel exclusively for
building. It uses autoconf for source config. This works quite nicely. For
example it means we can configure (inc
