Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:55:48PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
fixing my sentence to avoid more confusion:
The IETF formally left the address space distribution regime when they
delegated responsibility to IANA
Wait.
I wouldn't say that it is dependent in the RIR, it is about an ISP
decision, not about a regional organization. (note, I work for one).
It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
depends
On 2013-08-20 16:33 , Arturo Servin wrote:
I wouldn't say that it is dependent in the RIR, it is about an ISP
decision, not about a regional organization. (note, I work for one).
Working for a RIR just means that you are implementing the rules that
are set by that RIRs membership. Thus
It was a disclaimer only.
.as
On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2013-08-20 16:33 , Arturo Servin wrote:
I wouldn't say that it is dependent in the RIR, it is about an ISP
decision, not about a regional organization. (note, I work for one).
Working for a RIR just
So it seems that we agree.
.as
On 8/20/13 11:36 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
It may be some bias from some organizations or individuals in those
regions, but at the end the decision of using /64, /60, /56 or /48
depends on the ISP alone.
As prefixes are allocated based on the
On 2013-08-20 16:40 , Arturo Servin wrote:
So it seems that we agree.
No, we do not agree as your statement is wrong.
I suggest you read up on:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-589
and as you claim to work for LACNIC:
http://lacnic.net/en/politicas/manual5.html
Greets,
Jeroen
On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Gert Doering g...@space.net wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Next to that there is a very nice IETF recommendation too...
The IETF formally left the address space distribution regime when they
delegated responsibility to ARIN.
