I wholeheartedly concur with the sentiments Bob expressed in his recent post
on this subject. I don't think that electropolitical correctness has any
more place on a DX list than do flames. I read a lot of sarcasm and some
anger in the forbidden thread but I did not see any of the insults that
Well I must say I agree wholeheartedly with you Dan, haha!
Bob Young
Analog, MA
From: Dan Strassberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
Americairca@hard-core-dx.com
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: [IRCA] Bob Young's comments on can't mention
Dan,
It is not that we ban it. Lynn and I never said that. But in almost
every case the flames get going and the edge is reached very quickly and
close if not to insults. Rarely is the subject ever able to get
discussed without it getting out of line.
Plus, in so many cases even when the
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 10:10 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Bob Young's comments on can't mention it
Dan,
It is not that we ban it. Lynn and I never said
Chuck,
How many times has it been discussed on this list through the years? If
it would have been an all out ban, then it would have never been
discussed again. There are a few lists out there that certain subjects
are banned and they are never discussed again period. Moving on is not
a ban. It
I think the list moderators are wrong to ban such discussions.
I agree with you on this one.
I think there is a fellow in Colorado with very thin skin.
Kevin
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Bob Young's comments on can't mention it
Chuck,
How many times has it been discussed on this list through the years? If
it would have been an all out ban, then it would have never been
discussed again. There are a few lists out there that certain subjects
are banned
But at least he didn't say HO.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Strassberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 12:46 PM
Subject: [IRCA] Bob Young's comments on can't mention it
I wholeheartedly concur with the sentiments Bob expressed in his recent
Chuck,
IBOC will always be a thorn in the side until it is gone for good. Lynn
I have no problems with civil discussions. But this last thread, I got
a couple complaints, plus it was right on the insulting edge. But in
most cases, as I stated, the discussions start getting close to flame
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Patrick Martin
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club ofAmerica
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Bob Young's comments on can't mention it
Chuck,
IBOC will always be a thorn
Chuck-
I understood it was a ban on the WKRP thread. It was getting out of hand,
and needed to be stopped.
Willis
Patrick:
None of your responses have given the clarification I asked for as to
whether we have a ban (you say no but Lynn's post says NO MORE POSTS ON
THIS THREAD!) and if
Or nappy headed
On May 6, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Chris Black wrote:
But at least he didn't say HO.
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
I think there is a fellow in Colorado with very thin skin.
Kevin
//
Kevin, weren't slanderous remarks like this, well after we were all told
by the moderators to cease and desist, part of what got you banned from
the NRC reflector? Did you not learn from that experience? I stepped
back and
I think this turned into something ugly only in some people's minds. I saw
only a spirited discussion. Also are there any boisterous pro-IBOC people
here? Or are there people here who really don't care one way or the other?
It seems to me that anyone who benignly accepts their hobby and maybe
Lemme get this straight. IBOC jams. Promoters deny it. They pollute spectrum
and deny listener choice, with what is, by any legit standard, harmful,
unlawful interference. They kept HD's troubles secret from the public they are
supposed to serve, for blatant reasons.
Now, in the eleventh
Bob -
Right, to paraphrase Mr. Fowler, President Reagan's FCC Chair, if you don't
like post, dump it. Boisterousness is up front, forthright, that's what scares
TeamBLOC.
They tried to sneak their jammer past citizens. They failed. Now they're
upset. In manner of nasty two year old
Estimado Y. -
Quite.
HD/IBAC/iBLOC is the most serious issue we, as well as the radio listening
public, face.
Ignore HD at your own peril.
Squelch debate, for fear of 'offending', and you might as well demolish all
your receivers.
Do I care if some putrescent, pusillanimous,
I think this turned into something ugly only in some people's minds. I saw
only a spirited discussion. Also are there any boisterous pro-IBOC people
here? Or are there people here who really don't care one way or the other?
Are there any who oppose IBOC?
Yes to all the above
Chuck,
To put it simply as Lynn said sometime back, Play nice. As you can
tell, the subject IBOC is still being discussed. I cannot speak for
Lynn, but the way I feel is, if a subject can be discussed politely,
then I see no issue. Lynn I jump in when that changes.
73,
Patrick
Co moderator
He couldn't stand rude people, Agent Starling. Called 'em, 'free range
rude'.
- Barney, c. 2001
Hannibal, Thomas
Harris
** See what's free at
20 matches
Mail list logo
