The noise here is much stronger with WFED nulled. With a different
radio I'm still putting the rough bearing at 310 from my QTH. WDEB is a
possibility.
Rob Keeney
Goose Creek SC
EM92xx
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Rick Dau wrote:
> Here's what we've got to work
Thanks for the generous comments, John, but John B. was pretty much in a class
by himself as far as hobby accomplishments. Without him (and Rob Ross, Allen
Willie and Colin Newell) the Ultralight niche group would probably have never
gotten off of the ground.
73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA,
On 2016-02-09, at 9:47 AM, d1028g...@comcast.net wrote:
> Thanks for the generous comments, John, but John B. was pretty much in a
> class by himself as far as hobby accomplishments. Without him (and Rob Ross,
> Allen Willie and Colin Newell) the Ultralight niche group would probably have
>
In all the reminiscences I'm not sure if anybody has mentioned (and if someone
already did, forgive me) another way John tried to "spark" the AM DXing hobby a
number of years ago: the formation of a little group he called "Corazon DX" to
foster DXing and IDing of Mexican AMs.
Randy Stewart
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2016 Feb 09 1805 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 08 February follow.
Solar flux 115 and estimated planetary A-index 17.
The
Glenn,
Sorry. A bit under the weather the past few days.
But I’ve checked and rechecked the reading from here. Maximum null was recorded
at 330 degrees. That puts the mystery signal at a bearing of 240 degrees or 60
degrees. Rotating the portable radio shows maximum signal from those bearings
For those who have access to the scarce 100mm x 20mm x 3mm ferrite bars and who
have built (or plan to build) the original 3" Bar FSL Tecsun PL-380 model (for
which the construction article is posted at
http://www.mediafire.com/view/w0gcek56f6aq7kr/3_Inch_FSL_Tecsun_PL.doc ), the
question has
Took my time tonight, and carefully took bearings to determine my deepest null
of the signal. Adding and subtracting 90 degrees from that bearing puts the
source of the mystery signal at either 240 degrees (WNW) or 60 degrees (ENE)
I’m located near Alabaster, AL in Maylene, AL.
73,
Les
--- Begin Message ---
This is getting more and more confusing. Tom, do you mean then that the maximum
signal would be 90 degrees away from 170, i.e., 80 / 260 degrees, or do you
mean that 170 degrees is the direxion of the maximum, not minimum signal? I
thought you previously found it to be
I just checked 1500khz again this afternoon and as
mentioned yesterday the "null" (minimum signal) for the
noise is around 170 degrees. The antenna is a Quantum QX
Pro located in the attic.
Tom Jasinski
Joliet, IL
___
IRCA mailing list
Tom, so you're hearing the mystery noise in the afternoon? What time?
73,
Tim
On Feb 9, 2016 6:51 PM, wrote:
> I just checked 1500khz again this afternoon and as
> mentioned yesterday the "null" (minimum signal) for the
> noise is around 170 degrees. The antenna is a Quantum
Glenn:
Yes, for some unknown reason it has gotten very confusing!
The best way to get a bearing with the quantum loop is to
find the "null" (minimum signal) because it is just a few
degrees wide! Can't get any easier then that. This
mystery station noise signal is too weak to deflect the
Theo,
Would you kind enough to e-mail me Bryan Clark’s street address? My e-mails
don’t seem to be getting through. I think it is a Comcast thing.
Thanks.
Pete Taylor
Tacoma, WA
12225w 4719n
HQ180 & ICF2010
Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300/380
WOW GUYS!
Basic NULLING 101!
If a station is east of you, its at 90 degrees relative.
OK Should be easy!
If you aim the end of a ferrite loop antenna pointing at
90 degrees (east/west) you are NULLING that station. Its
still at 90 degrees relative, it did not move, it is
stationary! GOT IT!
For what it is worth I would suggest that people simply report the bearings
of maximum signals and stop reporting things as "null maximums". Simply
report a direction for the
*maximum signals ! *Of course (generally) when using a loop there usually
be a second maximum point about 180 degrees
Pretty complete bust at sunrise today, but a few of the big guns
turned up earlier; much earlier in one or two cases.
pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker,
at least briefly):
594 JOAK man in Japanese 1444UT, stayed at this level for about 5
minutes, then
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2016 Feb 10 0010 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 09 February follow.
Solar flux 117 and estimated planetary A-index 10.
The
--- Begin Message ---
There were a lot of TA's coming through when I checked at 7 p.m. EST / UTC.
I'll check again at 10 p.m. EST / 0300 UTC.
As far as 1500 goes, only normal-sounding WFED here. If anything's under, it
would be the Venezuelan. But we're talking about way under. And no
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0hc0zafc34mdrde/1500.jpg?dl=0
This is a link to a jpg with all the bearings I have seen reported so far,
along with pins marking all stations in the area.
Looks to me like we need to lean on an Alcoa TN resident and ask him to take a
little drive. Which resident
As I was taught in the Navy
You find the signal. Then you rotate the antenna for minimum signal. That is
the direction the sending station is located.
Kevin
Crump, TN
On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Glenn Hauser via IRCA wrote:
> This is getting more and more confusing. Tom, do you mean then
That is always true for loop antennas. There's no reason to even mention the
maximum. The null is sharp (narrow) and deep and there fore easily detected.
The peak is extremely broad and you won't see a difference if you are off by
20, 30 or more degrees.
Now if I only knew if people were using
Just goes to show that John was a multi-dimensional fellow, with an
incredible array of interests! And, an outstanding author. I treasure the
Proceedings series, and his Zenith books, the latter co-authored with
Harold Cones. Walt Salmaniw
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Stewart, Joseph R <
Like many of you I also have many fond memories of John, and had such
admiration for him. He and I first met in 1987 when I was publishing the
Cascade Mountain DX Club bulletin, and he joined so that he could keep on
top of shortwave DX heard from the Pacific Northwest (he and his wife Linda
Mark:
Mexico City is so very very far off of the reported bearings that it is totally
impossible in my mind.
Chuck
From: IRCA on behalf of Mark Connelly via IRCA
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Thank you for the excellent map! Now we are getting somewhere. Nice
presentation!
My own data is missing from the map: I'm at 40N/80W (extreme SW PA), and the
signal nulls almost perfectly east-west for me, or bearings of 90 degrees /
270 degrees (which points directly at WBRI, although it is
Problem is that according to the reported bearings, there are no nighttime
stations with any chance whatsoever of being heard by all the people who have
heard it.
So - shockingly - we must consider the possibility of a daytimer operating as
more than a daytimer. Whodda thunk it?
And yes, I
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry, the confusion was mine as far as the terminology. Right, of course.
Getting a null on a bi-direxional antenna means it`s pointing at (and exactly
away from) the station, i.e. the axis from which its maximum signal is coming.
Glenn
--- Begin Message ---
I have not caught up to all the subsequent comments cross-posted or not to some
or all of the lists --- but replying to this from Les:
By `maximum null of 330 degrees` I think he must mean off the broadside of the
loop/ferrite, not off the ends, right? Otherwise as Tom et
Guy,
That is really a great pic of John. He is really missed. We have lost a lot of
great fellow DXers in the past few years.
Patrick Martin
Seaside OR
KGED QSL Manager
> From: d...@guyatkins.com
> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:00:16 -0800
> To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] John
29 matches
Mail list logo