Thanks a lot for pushing on this!
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:45 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
FYI, my patch
Sounds great. Thanks for pushing on this!
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 7:19 PM
To: ironruby-core
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Updated my patch
: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Attached is a new patch I would propose to address the feedback from the Ruby
Gems team. I would love some feedback on it.
It is a patch against rev 2463 of trunk of Ruby Gems source.
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Wed, Mar 10
-universal-dotnet.
*From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:
ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Will Green
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:57 PM
*To:* ironruby-core
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Attached is a new patch I
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.orgironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Wouldn’t “clr” be better after all?
Tomas
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
] IronRuby version of existing gems
Wouldn’t “clr” be better after all?
Tomas
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core
-dotnet4.0”
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Tomas Matousek
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:11 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Wouldn’t “clr” be better after all
than just gemname-universal-dotnet. From:
ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 8:57 PM
To: ironruby-core
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems Attached is a
new patch I
The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so gemname-universal-dotNET would
read better than just gemname-universal-dotnet.
dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for terrible marketing and
terrible naming, so I'd argue that use the correct spelling is an
anti-feature :-)
Personally, I like
I don't care either way as long as it's lower-case
On Thursday, March 11, 2010, Orion Edwards orion.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
The name is spelled as “.NET”, and so gemname-universal-dotNET would read
better than just gemname-universal-dotnet.
dotNET looks awful. Microsoft are well known for
Updated my patch to Ruby Gems to match on universal-dotnetX.X, where X.X
is the version number.
This will allow for the creation of .NET-specific gems with names like:
- gemname-dotnet
- gemname-dotnet-2.0
- gemname-dotnet-4.0
- gemname-universal-dotnet
- gemname-universal-dotnet-2.0
-
...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Shri Borde
*Sent:* Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:53 PM
*To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Will, could you recreate the universal-.net gem again and push it? I think
it might have been created incorrectly
:
ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Shri Borde
*Sent:* Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:53 PM
*To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Will, could you recreate the universal-.net gem again and push it? I think
it might have
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 08:07, Will Green w...@hotgazpacho.org wrote:
I would appreciate if someone running the latest from git would try
ir -S gem install iron-term-ansicolor
on both the .Net 2 and the .Net 4 runtimes, and let me know which gem gets
installed.
Thanks, Daniele!
I've got three version of iron-term-ansicolor out there on RubyGems.org:
- iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3 (gemspec.platform=ruby)
- iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3-universal-.net
(gemspec.platform=universal-.net)
-
-core
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Thanks, Daniele!
I've got three version of iron-term-ansicolor out there on RubyGems.org:
* iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3 (gemspec.platform=ruby)
* iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3-universal-.net
: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:27 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
My guess is that RubyGems tries to look for an exact platform
...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:53 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Will, could you recreate the universal-.net gem again and push it? I think it
might have
@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the
RUBY_PLATFORM variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here.
Currently, it reports i386-mswin32.
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org
...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:08 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Cool beans!
I noticed in the latest push that a change was made to Ruby Gems itself:
http://github.com/ironruby/ironruby/commit
*To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the
RUBY_PLATFORM variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here.
Currently, it reports i386-mswin32.
--
Will Green
as a courtesy heads-up…
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 8:11 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I'd have to talk to Luis Lavena
[mailto:
ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Will Green
*Sent:* Friday, March 05, 2010 8:11 AM
*To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I'd have to talk to Luis Lavena, the current maintainer of win32console. I
might also
-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:46 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I may not fully understand the Gem process here, so please pardon any ignorance.
As I understand it, the ability
...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-
boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:46 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I may not fully understand the Gem process here, so please pardon
any ignorance
: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org]
on behalf of Will Green [w...@hotgazpacho.org]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 9:46 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I may not fully understand the Gem process here
: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Will Green
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:52 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses
: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the RUBY_PLATFORM
variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here. Currently, it
reports i386-mswin32.
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM
: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the RUBY_PLATFORM
variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here. Currently, it
reports i386-mswin32.
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1
@rubyforge.org ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
It does seem like there isn’t a way to distinguish between IronRuby and
MRI.
C:\ ir.exe
require rubygems
= true
Gem::Platform.local()
= #Gem::Platform:0x1409 @cpu=x86, @os=mswin32
Of *Will Green
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:52 AM
*To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
*Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the
RUBY_PLATFORM variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here
?
--
From: Shri Borde shri.bo...@microsoft.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 9:55 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
It does seem like there isn’t a way to distinguish between IronRuby
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
we need to update rbconfig. it should also detect the runtime correctly
---
Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
Ivan Porto Carrero
Web: http://whiterabbitconsulting.eu - http
: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 5:05 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
I will set RUBY_PLATFORM to “.net” and RbConfig::CONFIG[“arch”] to
“universal-.net-2.0” (or “universal-.net-4.0” for the .NET 4 builds)
From: ironruby-core-boun
: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:31 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby version of existing gems
Does anyone know if this will allow authoring of IronRuby
I believe JRuby is doing the 1st one, which makes sense in my opinion. If
possible we should prefer platform == “ironruby”, (or .net, do we need to
differentiate .net and mono?), but accept others.
JD
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On
That all depends on how Gem checks the platform. If it uses the
RUBY_PLATFORM variable, then IronRuby needs to change what it reports here.
Currently, it reports i386-mswin32.
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Jim Deville jdevi...@microsoft.com wrote:
I
38 matches
Mail list logo
