[jira] Commented: (CODEC-81) Base64's new constructor parameters ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735485#action_12735485 ] Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-81: --- The patch line: desiredResult =

[jira] Updated: (CODEC-81) Base64's new constructor parameters ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated CODEC-81: -- Affects Version/s: (was: 1.4) Nightly Builds Base64's new constructor

[jira] Created: (VALIDATOR-277) Validating disabled field

Validating disabled field - Key: VALIDATOR-277 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-277 Project: Commons Validator Issue Type: Bug Components: JavaScript Affects Versions: 1.3.1 Release

[jira] Updated: (VALIDATOR-277) Validating disabled field

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kunal Chowdhary updated VALIDATOR-277: -- Description: It seems, inside jcv_isFieldPresent() method we are doing a wrong

[jira] Created: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection -- Key: JEXL-60 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60 Project: Commons JEXL Issue Type: Improvement Affects

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-60: -- Attachment: JEXL-60.patch The patch (as a patch file) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-35: -- Attachment: (was: JEXL-35.patch) Final API requirements --

[jira] Commented: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735593#action_12735593 ] Henri Biestro commented on JEXL-35: --- The whole refactoring has moved to JEXL-60 . This

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-35: -- Attachment: (was: JEXL-35.patch) Final API requirements --

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-35: -- Attachment: (was: JEXL-35.patch) Final API requirements --

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-35: -- Attachment: (was: JEXL-35.patch) Final API requirements --

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JEXL-35) Final API requirements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-35?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735593#action_12735593 ] Henri Biestro edited comment on JEXL-35 at 7/27/09 5:52 AM: The

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-60: -- Description: While working on JEXL-35 and looking at Cobertua reports, it appeared that some classes in

[jira] Updated: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-60: -- Attachment: jexl60.tar.gz Since the patch can not apply cleanly, here is an alternate in the form of a

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735602#action_12735602 ] Henri Biestro edited comment on JEXL-60 at 7/27/09 6:37 AM: To

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (JEXL-60) Refactor o.a.c.jexl.util and o.a.c.jexl.util.introspection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735602#action_12735602 ] Henri Biestro edited comment on JEXL-60 at 7/27/09 6:39 AM: To

[jira] Created: (CODEC-82) OSGI manifest information is not generated during the ant build

OSGI manifest information is not generated during the ant build --- Key: CODEC-82 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-82 Project: Commons Codec Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Commented: (LANG-453) ToStringBuilder can cause serious memory leaks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735682#action_12735682 ] Paul Martin commented on LANG-453: -- Can this be reopened? Or should I create a new issue

[jira] Created: (LANG-520) HashCodeBuilder.hashCode() should return the same value as HashCodeBuilder.toHashCode()

HashCodeBuilder.hashCode() should return the same value as HashCodeBuilder.toHashCode() --- Key: LANG-520 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-520

[jira] Updated: (CODEC-81) Base64's new constructor parameters ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julius Davies updated CODEC-81: --- Attachment: (was: codec81-junit.patch) Base64's new constructor parameters ignored

[jira] Updated: (CODEC-81) Base64's new constructor parameters ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julius Davies updated CODEC-81: --- Attachment: codec81-junit-java14.patch Whoops! Previous was not Java1.4 compatible. Sorry!

[jira] Commented: (CODEC-59) Add methods to Base64 which work with String instead of byte[]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735706#action_12735706 ] Julius Davies commented on CODEC-59: Attached patch introduces following String methods

[jira] Created: (DBCP-298) CLONE -Connection socket hangs sporadically in DBCP 1.2.2 but not 1.2.1

CLONE -Connection socket hangs sporadically in DBCP 1.2.2 but not 1.2.1 --- Key: DBCP-298 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-298 Project: Commons Dbcp Issue

[jira] Updated: (DBCP-298) CLONE -Connection socket hangs sporadically in DBCP 1.2.2 but not 1.2.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Denson Kim updated DBCP-298: I am having the same problem of all tomcat process hung at getting a dabase connection:

[jira] Commented: (BEANUTILS-353) Unable to call isUseDefault() to check whether a default value will be returned

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735754#action_12735754 ] Niall Pemberton commented on BEANUTILS-353: --- Many of the new converter

[jira] Created: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

Don't log VFS internal info unless vital Key: VFS-270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270 Project: Commons VFS Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 1.0 Environment:

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735763#action_12735763 ] William Pietri commented on VFS-270: Since people often end up on issue tracker pages

[jira] Commented: (BEANUTILS-353) Unable to call isUseDefault() to check whether a default value will be returned

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735782#action_12735782 ] Franklin Phan commented on BEANUTILS-353: - Even calling a getter here is unsafe?

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735799#action_12735799 ] Ralph Goers commented on VFS-270: - Wouldn't it be easier to just configure the logging level

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735799#action_12735799 ] Ralph Goers edited comment on VFS-270 at 7/27/09 2:59 PM: -- Wouldn't

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735799#action_12735799 ] Ralph Goers edited comment on VFS-270 at 7/27/09 3:04 PM: -- Wouldn't

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735804#action_12735804 ] William Pietri commented on VFS-270: Hi, Ralph. I'm not sure if you're talking about my

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735808#action_12735808 ] William Pietri commented on VFS-270: Hi, Ralph. Apparently you edited your message while I

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735826#action_12735826 ] Ralph Goers commented on VFS-270: - You have not convinced me. While I'm not the only committer

[jira] Commented: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735836#action_12735836 ] William Pietri commented on VFS-270: Ok. It's your library, so you should feel free to do

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (VFS-270) Don't log VFS internal info unless vital

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735836#action_12735836 ] William Pietri edited comment on VFS-270 at 7/27/09 4:21 PM: - Ok.

[jira] Commented: (BEANUTILS-353) Unable to call isUseDefault() to check whether a default value will be returned

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12735861#action_12735861 ] Niall Pemberton commented on BEANUTILS-353: --- The isUseDefault() method is not