[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14986969#comment-14986969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2939:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1316
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14986992#comment-14986992
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2951:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-153289042
Cool stuff, really! This is very much in line with what I had in mind for a
SQL backend.
Let me check if I understood everything correct (and see where my
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1315#issuecomment-153301440
@twalthr Do you want to take care of merging this as well as the other
Table API PRs? :smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1313
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14986968#comment-14986968
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2953:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1304#issuecomment-153302034
@uce Builds seems to be failing. Can you look into it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1314#issuecomment-153382972
Thanks. Merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1214#issuecomment-153381184
Cool. :)
Squashing commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987439#comment-14987439
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2959:
---
+1 Let's configure this only through the
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1322#issuecomment-153385795
So all timestamps have to be in UTC timezone. Isn't this a bit limiting?
Could it per default take the system timezone and allow to override the
timezone in a cast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987443#comment-14987443
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2961:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-2953.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Chained sortPartition() calls produce incorrect results in Scala
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14986996#comment-14986996
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2930:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987112#comment-14987112
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2957:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1237#discussion_r43742661
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/expressions/analysis/FieldBacktracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987193#comment-14987193
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2828:
---
Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull
Timo Walther created FLINK-2961:
---
Summary: Add support for basic type Date in Table API
Key: FLINK-2961
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2961
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987199#comment-14987199
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2951:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
GitHub user mjsax opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320
[FLINK-2752] [Documentation] Documentation is not easily differentiable
from the Flink homepage
Changed menu color schema to make page clearly distinguishable from project
page.
You can merge this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987221#comment-14987221
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
GitHub user mjsax opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias J. Sax reassigned FLINK-2752:
--
Assignee: Matthias J. Sax
> Documentation is not easily differentiable from the Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987238#comment-14987238
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1472:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Goel closed FLINK-2413.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in the new frontend.
> Provide real vertex data
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987259#comment-14987259
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2732:
[~mliesenberg] what's the status on this?
> Add access to the
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-153351332
@gyfora That's what I meant, basically the timestamps could subsume the
role of the checkpointIds. I.e. The checkpointIds have the semantics of the
timestamps and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987261#comment-14987261
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320#discussion_r43746302
--- Diff: docs/internals/coding_guidelines.md ---
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-title: "Coding Guidelines"
-
-
-The *Coding Guidelines* are
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320#discussion_r43746314
--- Diff: docs/internals/how_to_contribute.md ---
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-title: "How to Contribute"
-
-
-The *How to Contribute*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987264#comment-14987264
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987268#comment-14987268
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987266#comment-14987266
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320#discussion_r43746460
--- Diff: docs/internals/coding_guidelines.md ---
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-title: "Coding Guidelines"
-
-
-The *Coding Guidelines*
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320#discussion_r43746560
--- Diff: docs/_includes/navbar.html ---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
-
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1315#issuecomment-153302634
By the other I meant the documentation PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-2958:
--
Summary: StreamingJobGraphGenerator sets hard coded number
execution retry
Key: FLINK-2958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2958
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987111#comment-14987111
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2957:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1319#issuecomment-153320254
@StephanEwen Is this better?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1315#issuecomment-153341079
@aljoscha yes, I'll take care of the two PRs ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/439#issuecomment-153347995
@fhueske This issue is present in the new frontend also. See the attached
screenshot:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987251#comment-14987251
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2045:
Has someone observed this with the new frontend? I doubt it
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-153339094
@StephanEwen
Thanks for the comments. You are right the main idea is exactly as you
described.
The reason why exactly-once is violated in some corner cases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987246#comment-14987246
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-1614:
This should be closed because of the new frontend. We can reopen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Goel closed FLINK-2416.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented in the new frontend.
> Expose vertex using with the new URL scheme
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987270#comment-14987270
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2752:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1320#discussion_r43746639
--- Diff: docs/internals/coding_guidelines.md ---
@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-title: "Coding Guidelines"
-
-
-The *Coding Guidelines* are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987276#comment-14987276
]
Piotr Godek commented on FLINK-2942:
[~StephanEwen] I will take a look end of this week.
[~fhueske]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987013#comment-14987013
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2939:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1313#issuecomment-153303602
@StephanEwen , since this is already merged, I'll push another commit and
point you to it for merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sachin Goel reassigned FLINK-2957:
--
Assignee: Sachin Goel
> Make cancel button look less like a label
>
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-153307495
@aljoscha
1. I was initially using the MockEnvironments but I added the
DummyEnvironment for several reasons: I wanted control over the JobId and the
number of
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-153305943
Just some remarks:
- `DummyEnvironment` seems unnecessary, we already have
`StreamMockEnvironment`. I think it could be reused.
- In the first version you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987020#comment-14987020
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2939:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2954:
--
Affects Version/s: 0.10
> Not able to pass custom environment variables in cluster to
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-2959:
--
Summary: Remove number of execution retries configuration from
Environment
Key: FLINK-2959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2959
Project: Flink
Maximilian Michels created FLINK-2960:
-
Summary: Communicate with JobManager through YARN proxy
Key: FLINK-2960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2960
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2954:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.0
> Not able to pass custom environment variables in cluster to
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1304#issuecomment-153317144
I've also added FLINK-2958 in this PR.
What's your opinion about FLINK-2959?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1305#issuecomment-15538
2. Ah, I meant the lookupTimestamp. In an earlier version you used both the
checkpointId and lookupTimestamp to perform key lookups.
3. I see, in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987005#comment-14987005
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2951:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-2939.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Add button to cancel jobs in new web frontend
>
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1313#issuecomment-153305865
@StephanEwen Sorry, didn't see your post. I filed a follow-up JIRA for
this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Maximilian Michels created FLINK-2957:
-
Summary: Make cancel button look less like a label
Key: FLINK-2957
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987102#comment-14987102
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2930:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1304#issuecomment-153386537
Thanks for fixing. Merging commits for FLINK-2930 and FLINK-2958.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987450#comment-14987450
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2930:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1304
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1314
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-2958.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> StreamingJobGraphGenerator sets hard coded number execution retry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987456#comment-14987456
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2930:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2958:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.0
> StreamingJobGraphGenerator sets hard coded number execution retry
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1319#issuecomment-153392818
I don't understand. Simply a *cross* won't be any better than one with
*cancel* right next to it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987486#comment-14987486
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2957:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987492#comment-14987492
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2957:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1319#issuecomment-153394232
I meant a button like for the + - buttons but labelled "Cancel".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-2930.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0
0.10
> ExecutionConfig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987467#comment-14987467
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2943:
---
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-1614.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Closed until further notice.
> JM Webfrontend doesn't always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987497#comment-14987497
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2961:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1319#issuecomment-153390926
Not really convinced by your changes. What about a normal button like the +
- buttons?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987476#comment-14987476
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2957:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
GitHub user sachingoel0101 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1323
[FLINK-2943][web-dashboard] Confusing Bytes/Records "read" and "write"
labels in WebUI job view
Also includes a hotfix for the taskmanager charts legend and FLINK-2903.
You can merge this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987489#comment-14987489
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2952:
---
Go ahead.
> Runtimes > 24 hours are reported
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1322#issuecomment-153395500
I also also thought about that but I'm pretty sure that this introduces
issues difficult to debug. I think the most important thing is that the
conversion (from string
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987500#comment-14987500
]
Martin Liesenberg commented on FLINK-2732:
--
I was a bit busy in the last two week due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14987638#comment-14987638
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2961:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14988240#comment-14988240
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-2598:
-
This issue can be closed, right [~rmetzger] ?
> NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14988236#comment-14988236
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2918:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1299#issuecomment-153503199
Will merge this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14988661#comment-14988661
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2964:
---
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1324
[FLINK-2964] [runtime] Fix broken spilling of MutableHashTable
The `HashPartition` did not count properly the number of occupied memory
segments, because it excluded the memory segments of the
GitHub user jaoki opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1325
minor document fix.
Regarding example WordCount class name.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jaoki/flink
Ted Yu created FLINK-2963:
-
Summary: Dependence on SerializationUtils#deserialize() should be
avoided
Key: FLINK-2963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2963
Project: Flink
Issue
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-2964:
Summary: MutableHashTable fails when spilling partitions without
overflow segments
Key: FLINK-2964
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2964
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14989031#comment-14989031
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2964:
---
Github user fpompermaier commented on the pull request:
Github user fpompermaier commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1324#issuecomment-153606566
Do yiu think that this could fix also #2763?
On 4 Nov 2015 02:20, "Till Rohrmann" wrote:
> The HashPartition did not count
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14989044#comment-14989044
]
Chesnay Schepler commented on FLINK-2963:
-
Are you affected by this?
> Dependence on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14988155#comment-14988155
]
Martin Junghanns edited comment on FLINK-2905 at 11/4/15 7:11 AM:
--
Hi
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo