[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210737#comment-15210737
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2445:
---
Github user mliesenberg closed the pull request at:
Github user mliesenberg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1625
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210724#comment-15210724
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2445:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1625#issuecomment-200961463
Hi @mliesenberg, I merged this PR but it wasn't correctly closed. Can you
do it? Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200951040
Thanks for describing this.
This has quite some big implications, as far as I can see it. The state in
the connected stream is now a "broadcast state" not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210655#comment-15210655
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210628#comment-15210628
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200945681
I like @aljoscha's idea to separate more explicitly the user state access
and it's implementation. Having an accessor would also allow us to get rid of
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210612#comment-15210612
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3547:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1820#issuecomment-200942437
I've rebased on master and will merge once travis turns green :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210591#comment-15210591
]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-3667:
--
Sounds like a good idea. +1 :-)
> Generalize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210586#comment-15210586
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200933436
To elaborate on this. State right now works well if you stick to the
(admittedly somewhat hidden) rules. That is, you should only access state if
there is a key
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vasia Kalavri resolved FLINK-3639.
--
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
> Add methods and utilities to register
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210528#comment-15210528
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3639:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1827
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210494#comment-15210494
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3257:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1668#issuecomment-200909639
The core idea of this is very good, also the illustration is very nice.
After an offline chat with @senorcarbone, we concluded that a remaining
problem in
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200907475
@StephanEwen
This PR does not change the behaviour of any existing Flink applications.
It now allows though that users only specify key of one input of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210480#comment-15210480
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210412#comment-15210412
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210409#comment-15210409
]
Todd Lisonbee commented on FLINK-3664:
--
Hi Fabian, thanks for the feedback.
Your first 3 comments
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200887743
Can someone elaborate on the semantics?
I am against merging something that changes semantics and has zero
description.
---
If your project is set up for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210406#comment-15210406
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200886203
I think you can go ahead merging this if no-one has any objections :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1831#issuecomment-200888107
For example, how does keyed state work for the input side that is not key
partitioned? How is the key found? How is partitioning guaranteed?
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210413#comment-15210413
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3659:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1668#discussion_r57327419
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamIterationHead.java
---
@@ -17,43 +17,80 @@
package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210344#comment-15210344
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-3613:
--
Hi [~tlisonbee], thanks for the detailed design doc! I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210343#comment-15210343
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-3664:
--
Hi [~tlisonbee], I like this proposal a lot. It would be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210328#comment-15210328
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3257:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
Maximilian Michels created FLINK-3667:
-
Summary: Generalize client<->cluster communication
Key: FLINK-3667
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3667
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210320#comment-15210320
]
Till Rohrmann commented on FLINK-3633:
--
Yes that should work. Will try to update the PR. Thanks for
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1827#issuecomment-200864343
Merging!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210309#comment-15210309
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3651:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200863307
Yes, what @rmetzger said is correct. Without the fix and the increase of
parallelism it will be a flaky test that still succeeds sometimes.
---
If your project is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210282#comment-15210282
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1745:
---
Github user danielblazevski commented on the pull request:
Github user danielblazevski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1220#issuecomment-200854252
@tillrohrmann @chiwanpark done, polished up KNN.scala and some minor
changes -- e.g. expanding the description of the parameters in the beginning of
KNN.scala.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210279#comment-15210279
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3257:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1668#discussion_r57321347
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java
---
@@ -450,112 +450,121 @@ else if (operator != null) {
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-3666:
---
Summary: Remove Nephele references
Key: FLINK-3666
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3666
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1668#discussion_r57320231
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java
---
@@ -450,112 +450,121 @@ else if (operator != null) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210270#comment-15210270
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3257:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210263#comment-15210263
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3257:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1668#discussion_r57319737
--- Diff:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java
---
@@ -450,112 +450,121 @@ else if (operator != null) {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210261#comment-15210261
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3657:
---
Github user smarthi commented on the pull request:
Github user smarthi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1829#issuecomment-200848523
@uce @fhueske to add more context to this PR, we r in the final stretch of
a planned 0.12.0 Mahout release that adds Flink as a distributed engine for
Samsara linear
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1818#issuecomment-200830880
The other programs that are executed in `ClassLoaderITCase` are contained
in the `org.apache.flink.test.classloading.jar` package (search for
`KMeansForTest` for example).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210201#comment-15210201
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3633:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210180#comment-15210180
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3633:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1818#issuecomment-200821794
I agree that having a dedicated class loading test would be nicer. However,
we would need to build a jar containing the test job before executing the test,
right?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chiwan Park closed FLINK-2935.
--
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
Implemented via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210165#comment-15210165
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2935:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210134#comment-15210134
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2935:
---
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210133#comment-15210133
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3657:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
Github user chiwanpark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1500#issuecomment-200804302
Oh, thanks for pointing it @mxm. Then I'll merge this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1829#issuecomment-200804264
@uce, API stability is not an issue. The method was `private` before and
part of the accessible API. IMO, the question is rather whether we want to add
new features in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210129#comment-15210129
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3639:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1827#issuecomment-200803230
Changes look good! +1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1829#issuecomment-200803091
As a side note (I didn't look at the code changes): We can't rename the
method name for `1.0.1` as `DataSetUtils` is annotated with `PublicEvolving`,
meaning that we are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210127#comment-15210127
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3657:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1741#issuecomment-200803051
Continuing my review now, but don't block this on me. If I find anything
crucial, I will open a pull request against master if it is merged by then..
---
If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210126#comment-15210126
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3544:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1820#issuecomment-200802410
Thanks for the update! +1 to merge :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210123#comment-15210123
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3547:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210119#comment-15210119
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3633:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1818#issuecomment-200802077
The changes look good and make parts where user code is serialized very
clear. :+1:
I've verified that the `ScalaShellITCase` with the change in this PR fails
for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210118#comment-15210118
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-2946:
--
Hi [~dawidwys], thanks a lot for working on this issue!
I had
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-3665:
Summary: Range partitioning lacks support to define sort orders
Key: FLINK-3665
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3665
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2821:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
> Change Akka configuration to allow accessing actors from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210100#comment-15210100
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3651:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200796710
I think the test fails only sporadically, depending on the speed at which
tasks are deleting the files.
If you are lucky, everything is correct.
---
If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210096#comment-15210096
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3651:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830#issuecomment-200795802
Good catch! The changes look good to me.
I tried running the adjusted `RollingSinkFaultToleranceITCase` and
`RollingSinkFaultTolerance2ITCase` w/o the fix in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210093#comment-15210093
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3524:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1834#issuecomment-200795303
+1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210088#comment-15210088
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3658:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger resolved FLINK-3658.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
Resolved in master for 1.1.0
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1832
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1833#issuecomment-200793560
+1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210086#comment-15210086
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2609:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210081#comment-15210081
]
Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-3655:
---
Thank you for opening a JIRA for this feature request.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-3655:
--
Labels: starter (was: )
> Allow comma-separated or multiple directories to be specified for
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-3663.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.1
1.1.0
Fixed in f0b6ba4 (master),
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210074#comment-15210074
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3663:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1835
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210072#comment-15210072
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3663:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-3653.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.1
Fixed in 5357ebe (release-1.0), 27dfd86 (master).
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210070#comment-15210070
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3653:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1828
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210068#comment-15210068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3653:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1828#issuecomment-200786158
Thanks! I'm merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1820#issuecomment-200784086
Thanks. I've addressed you comments!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210065#comment-15210065
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3547:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210043#comment-15210043
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2935:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1500#issuecomment-200770572
Thanks @chiwanpark! As far as I can see, there are no overlapping classes
between the two pull requests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1741#issuecomment-200769986
I've incorporated the changes and the tests pass. I would like to merge the
pull request. Please let me know if there are still pending code reviews.
---
If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210039#comment-15210039
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3639:
---
Github user vasia commented on the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210037#comment-15210037
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3544:
---
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
