[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513987#comment-17513987
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-26892:
I think for 1. we don't need to do much as we just create a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513971#comment-17513971
]
Biao Geng commented on FLINK-26892:
---
I try to summary what we should do for this case:
1. Save latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513866#comment-17513866
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-26892:
Sorry, you are right.
I meant cases where the webhook is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513858#comment-17513858
]
Biao Geng commented on FLINK-26892:
---
Hi [~gyfora], I see your point.
The reason for I asking above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513831#comment-17513831
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-26892:
The problem is that the wrong config stays there "forever".
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17513791#comment-17513791
]
Biao Geng commented on FLINK-26892:
---
In our current implementation, validation error should only
