[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601046#comment-15601046
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-16931:
Oh.. nice debugging.. It would have been so hard for u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-15709:
--
Attachment: HBASE-15709-v1.patch
Move nextPacketSeqno++ to flushBuffer.
> Handle large edits for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601027#comment-15601027
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16929:
bq.Even though def impl is there in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601010#comment-15601010
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16463:
Will commit this later in the day unless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601006#comment-15601006
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15709:
---
The max packet size is 16MB, but it include the checksum and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15601002#comment-15601002
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15709:
---
{quote}
By the time we get into flush0, all bytes have been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600999#comment-15600999
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-15709:
So now instead of one packet you chunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600989#comment-15600989
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16890:
Yes. :)
> Analyze the performance of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600980#comment-15600980
]
stack commented on HBASE-16890:
---
So, single node DFS? Thanks [~ram_krish]
> Analyze the performance of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600977#comment-15600977
]
stack commented on HBASE-15709:
---
Patch seems good. By the time we get into flush0, all bytes have been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600970#comment-15600970
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16890:
Yup . Even for me WALPE on single node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600967#comment-15600967
]
stack commented on HBASE-15709:
---
Wahoo!!!
> Handle large edits for asynchronous WAL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600965#comment-15600965
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-16891:
Both are doing PureJava32CRC type of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600945#comment-15600945
]
stack commented on HBASE-16838:
---
You saw the [~jurmous] notes on possible Scan API? I liked them IIRC. One
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
binlijin updated HBASE-16931:
-
Attachment: HBASE-16931-master.patch
> Cleaned seqid in compaction should set back when write finish.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600905#comment-15600905
]
stack commented on HBASE-16698:
---
On HBASE-3899, I remembered it as an experiment that was never finished
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600904#comment-15600904
]
binlijin commented on HBASE-16931:
--
And this compaction exception cause 100+ regionservers down in one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600901#comment-15600901
]
binlijin commented on HBASE-16931:
--
The table VERSIONS => '65535'
> Cleaned seqid in compaction should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600900#comment-15600900
]
binlijin commented on HBASE-16931:
--
When i check the hfile's data there is “K:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
binlijin updated HBASE-16931:
-
Description:
Compactor#performCompaction
do {
hasMore = scanner.next(cells,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600889#comment-15600889
]
binlijin commented on HBASE-16931:
--
export HBASE_OPTS="-ea -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600885#comment-15600885
]
binlijin commented on HBASE-16931:
--
{code}
2016-10-21 20:43:41,348 ERROR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
binlijin updated HBASE-16931:
-
Description:
Compactor#performCompaction
do {
hasMore = scanner.next(cells,
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16932:
-
Summary: Implement small scan
Key: HBASE-16932
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16932
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600873#comment-15600873
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16463:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
binlijin created HBASE-16931:
Summary: Cleaned seqid in compaction should set back when write
finish.
Key: HBASE-16931
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16931
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600864#comment-15600864
]
stack commented on HBASE-16689:
---
The TODOs are tests on my part to garner better evidence for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600854#comment-15600854
]
stack commented on HBASE-16929:
---
Why would you commit something against the Shipped Interface w/o getting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600852#comment-15600852
]
stack commented on HBASE-15347:
---
Should we shove above list int he ref guide? I can do it. Any other things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16887:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600679#comment-15600679
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16887:
-
+1 looks great!
> Allow setting different hadoopcheck
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600663#comment-15600663
]
Dapeng Sun commented on HBASE-16463:
Thank [~ram_krish] and [~apurtell] for your review, I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16887:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Allow setting different hadoopcheck versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600659#comment-15600659
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16887:
---
[~busbey] Seems OK this time? I forgot to change the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dapeng Sun updated HBASE-16463:
---
Attachment: HBASE-16463.005.patch
> Improve transparent table/CF encryption with Commons Crypto
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Colin Ma updated HBASE-16414:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: [~ram_krish], thanks for your help on this change, and the release note
is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600651#comment-15600651
]
Colin Ma commented on HBASE-16414:
--
[~ram_krish], thanks for your help on this change, and the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600650#comment-15600650
]
Colin Ma commented on HBASE-16414:
--
[~ram_krish], thanks for your help on this change, and the release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Colin Ma updated HBASE-16414:
-
Release Note: With the security RPC and encryption enabled, introduce
Apache Commons Crypto to do the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600624#comment-15600624
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16887:
---
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600580#comment-15600580
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16887:
---
(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16887:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16887-v1.patch
> Allow setting different hadoopcheck versions in precommit for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16887:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16887-v1.patch
> Allow setting different hadoopcheck versions in precommit for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16887:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16887-v1.patch)
> Allow setting different hadoopcheck versions in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600230#comment-15600230
]
Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-15347:
-
[~busbey] yeah, I followed the discussion on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600220#comment-15600220
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-15347:
-
HBASE-10844 also has 1.3.0 listed as a fix version. Probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600215#comment-15600215
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16887:
-
Looks like just the test report call needs to be updated. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15600210#comment-15600210
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16887:
-
that output looks incorrect. This was against the master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599916#comment-15599916
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-16929:
bq.public class DelegateRegionScanner implements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599894#comment-15599894
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16887:
---
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote ||
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599852#comment-15599852
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16887:
---
(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599779#comment-15599779
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16463:
+1
The interfaces involved are tagged as evolving, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599770#comment-15599770
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-16414:
Appreciate the re-proposal of this feature using HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599624#comment-15599624
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16838:
---
In general, I think we should have 3 scan methods in AsyncTable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599449#comment-15599449
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-15709:
---
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599282#comment-15599282
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15709:
---
[~stack] I removed this in TestMobStoreScanne where we write a WAL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-15709:
--
Attachment: HBASE-15709.patch
Handle large ByteBuf when flush.
> Handle large edits for asynchronous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-15709:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Handle large edits for asynchronous WAL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang reassigned HBASE-15709:
-
Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Handle large edits for asynchronous WAL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-15709:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> Handle large edits for asynchronous WAL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599185#comment-15599185
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-16689:
---
Great doc! Will there be an umbrella tracking all TODOs mentioned in doc?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15599149#comment-15599149
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-16698:
---
bq. Lets not backport to 1.2 until it in 1.3. Thats how we generally do
62 matches
Mail list logo
