[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21112) [Auth] IPC client fallback to simple auth (forward-port to master)

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656305#comment-16656305 ] stack commented on HBASE-21112: --- Any progress here? Thanks. > [Auth] IPC client fallback to simple auth

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21264) Namespace Quota : Split after exceeding maxregions- regions went to other regions state and never come back online

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656304#comment-16656304 ] stack commented on HBASE-21264: --- No patch or response. Removing from 2.1.1. > Namespace Quota : Split

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21264) Namespace Quota : Split after exceeding maxregions- regions went to other regions state and never come back online

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21264: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.1) > Namespace Quota : Split after exceeding maxregions- regions went to other

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20540) [umbrella] Hadoop 3 compatibility

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656303#comment-16656303 ] stack commented on HBASE-20540: --- All subtasks are resolved here. Should we resolve this umbrella issue? >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21262) [hbck2] AMv2 Lock Picker

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656301#comment-16656301 ] stack commented on HBASE-21262: --- Moved out of branch-2.1 because no patch. > [hbck2] AMv2 Lock Picker >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20926) IntegrationTestRSGroup is broken

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656299#comment-16656299 ] stack commented on HBASE-20926: --- No patch. Moving out of branch-2.1. > IntegrationTestRSGroup is broken

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20926) IntegrationTestRSGroup is broken

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-20926: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.1) > IntegrationTestRSGroup is broken > - > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21262) [hbck2] AMv2 Lock Picker

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21262: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3) (was: 2.1.1) > [hbck2] AMv2 Lock Picker >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21294) [2.1] Update bouncycastle dependency.

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656296#comment-16656296 ] stack commented on HBASE-21294: --- You think this stuff ok to do in a point release [~elserj] ? Can we skip

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21145) Backport "HBASE-21126 Add ability for HBase Canary to ignore a configurable number of ZooKeeper down nodes" to branch-2.1

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21145: -- Fix Version/s: 2.2.0 3.0.0 > Backport "HBASE-21126 Add ability for HBase Canary to ignore

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21145) Backport "HBASE-21126 Add ability for HBase Canary to ignore a configurable number of ZooKeeper down nodes" to branch-2.1

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21145. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed This made it into branch-2.1 tree

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21215) Figure how to invoke hbck2; make it easy to find

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656288#comment-16656288 ] stack commented on HBASE-21215: --- This issue should cover the corollary, purging hbck1 from our refguide...

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Josh Elser (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656264#comment-16656264 ] Josh Elser commented on HBASE-21344: I think Ankit also found (via unit tests in the patch) that you

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656262#comment-16656262 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-21342: Added ClassRule to TestSecureBulkloadManager. Let's see what QA bot

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-21342: --- Attachment: 21342.v1.txt > FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-21342: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656254#comment-16656254 ] stack commented on HBASE-21344: --- I was going to say try removing the znode, manually [~an...@apache.org],

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656248#comment-16656248 ] Ankit Singhal edited comment on HBASE-21344 at 10/19/18 4:01 AM: -

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-21344: -- Attachment: HBASE-21344-branch-2.0.patch > hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656248#comment-16656248 ] Ankit Singhal commented on HBASE-21344: --- bq. Is this 2.0.0 or branch-2.0? I checked with

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20952) Re-visit the WAL API

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656244#comment-16656244 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-20952: Results for branch HBASE-20952 [build #22 on

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-21344: -- Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0.0) > hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656233#comment-16656233 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21336: --- Review board link: https://reviews.apache.org/r/69079/ >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656227#comment-16656227 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21336: --- Split the WALProcedureMap into two classes, one is still called

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21336: -- Fix Version/s: 2.2.0 3.0.0 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21336: -- Attachment: HBASE-21336.patch > Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21336: -- Component/s: proc-v2 > Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656223#comment-16656223 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-21336 at 10/19/18 3:10 AM: -- Totally

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656223#comment-16656223 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-21336: Totally agree, I just finished reading WALProcedureMap, the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21336: -- Attachment: HBASE-21336.patch > Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21336) Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21336: -- Attachment: (was: HBASE-21336.patch) > Simplify the implementation of WALProcedureMap >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21194) Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature

2018-10-18 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656221#comment-16656221 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-21194: Thanks for working on this, Artem. {code} +

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656220#comment-16656220 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- Reverted this patch and addendum from branch-2.0 and branch-2.1. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656217#comment-16656217 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- bq. Oh I mean we can revert the patch first to make the build clean.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21292) IdLock.getLockEntry() may hang if interrupted

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656212#comment-16656212 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21292: Results for branch branch-2.1 [build #486 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656210#comment-16656210 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21323: Results for branch branch-2.1 [build #486 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21291) Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656211#comment-16656211 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21291: Results for branch branch-2.1 [build #486 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656209#comment-16656209 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21323: --- Oh I mean we can revert the patch first to make the build clean.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656208#comment-16656208 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- How would I test fo holes? Add a rollback? > Should not skip force

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reopened HBASE-21323: --- Thanks for taking a look. bq. So please revert the patch for branch-2.1 and branch-2.0? Let me reopen. Will

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656195#comment-16656195 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-21344: I have seen similar issues, a Assign procedure of SCP failed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21291) Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656181#comment-16656181 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21291: Results for branch branch-2.0 [build #971 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656179#comment-16656179 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21323: Results for branch branch-2.0 [build #971 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21292) IdLock.getLockEntry() may hang if interrupted

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656182#comment-16656182 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21292: Results for branch branch-2.0 [build #971 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21341) DeadServer shouldn't import unshaded Preconditions

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656145#comment-16656145 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21341: --- I do no think checkstyle is strong enough. We sometimes want to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21292) IdLock.getLockEntry() may hang if interrupted

2018-10-18 Thread Allan Yang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656135#comment-16656135 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-21292: Will file another issue for backporting, thanks for committing

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21073) "Maintenance mode" master

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656133#comment-16656133 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21073: --- If possible please also backport to branch-2.1 and branch-2.0. I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21213) [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when assign/unassign

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656085#comment-16656085 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21213: Results for branch branch-2 [build #1409 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21269) Forward-port to branch-2 " HBASE-21213 [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when assign/unassign"

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656084#comment-16656084 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21269: Results for branch branch-2 [build #1409 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656034#comment-16656034 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21323: --- So please revert the patch for branch-2.1 and branch-2.0? We need

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16656014#comment-16656014 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21323: --- Then it will be another big problem? There will be holes for the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655979#comment-16655979 ] stack commented on HBASE-21344: --- Is this 2.0.0 or branch-2.0? If Master is restarted, what happens? >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21073) "Maintenance mode" master

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655952#comment-16655952 ] stack commented on HBASE-21073: --- Come back to branch-2.0 if possible. Hope to make a fixup building block

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21194) Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature

2018-10-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655947#comment-16655947 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21194: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655945#comment-16655945 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- bq. Oh I think the problem is that we will only delete the sub procedures

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-11747: -- Component/s: scaling Operability master > ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21307) [amv2] Deadlock when we move a Region from a not-online RegionServer

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21307. --- Resolution: Duplicate Resolving as another example of HBASE-21288. Will keep an eye out to see if the soln

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-21344) hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever

2018-10-18 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
Ankit Singhal created HBASE-21344: - Summary: hbase:meta location in ZooKeeper set to OPENING by the procedure which eventually failed but precludes Master from assigning it forever Key: HBASE-21344 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21213) [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when assign/unassign

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655931#comment-16655931 ] stack commented on HBASE-21213: --- In HBASE-21307 [~Apache9] says... bq. One simple solution is just

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21292) IdLock.getLockEntry() may hang if interrupted

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21292: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4.9)

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21335) Change the default wait time of HBCK2 tool

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21335. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.3 2.1.1

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21073) "Maintenance mode" master

2018-10-18 Thread Mike Drob (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655909#comment-16655909 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-21073: --- Thanks stack, pushed to master. Which branches do we want this

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21291) Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21291. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.0.3 2.1.1 Pushed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21073) "Maintenance mode" master

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655893#comment-16655893 ] stack commented on HBASE-21073: --- +1 Looks great. Thanks for assuming 'maintenance mode' label. Use your

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21073) "Maintenance mode" master

2018-10-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655890#comment-16655890 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21073: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21341) DeadServer shouldn't import unshaded Preconditions

2018-10-18 Thread Sean Busbey (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655891#comment-16655891 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-21341: - I thought we had a checkstyle guard against this getting in.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21291) Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21291: -- Release Note: bypass will now throw an Exception if passed a lockWait <= 0; i.e bypass will prevent an

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-21291) Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reopened HBASE-21291: --- Reopen for backport. > Add a test for bypassing stuck state-machine procedures >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21275) Thrift Server (branch 1 fix) -> Disable TRACE HTTP method for thrift http server (branch 1 only)

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21275: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Pushed to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21275) Thrift Server (branch 1 fix) -> Disable TRACE HTTP method for thrift http server (branch 1 only)

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21275: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.7) 1.4.9 > Thrift Server (branch 1 fix) -> Disable TRACE HTTP

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21275) Thrift Server (branch 1 fix) -> Disable TRACE HTTP method for thrift http server (branch 1 only)

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21275: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4.8) > Thrift Server (branch 1 fix) -> Disable TRACE HTTP method for thrift http

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20874) Sending compaction descriptions from all regionservers to master.

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655869#comment-16655869 ] stack commented on HBASE-20874: --- Ran into HBASE-11747. When 1800 regions on a server, we are heartbeating

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21194) Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Artem Ervits updated HBASE-21194: - Attachment: HBASE-21194.v01.patch > Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21194) Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Artem Ervits updated HBASE-21194: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21323: -- Attachment: 0001-HBASE-21323-Should-not-skip-force-updating-for-a-sub.ADDENDUM.patch > Should not skip force

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21323. --- Resolution: Fixed Pushed attached addendum on branch-2.1 and branch-2.0. Let me know if I got it wrong

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655851#comment-16655851 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- Oh, also removed the check that DummyProcedure is SUCCESS ful... since it

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21323) Should not skip force updating for a sub procedure even if it has been finished

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655843#comment-16655843 ] stack commented on HBASE-21323: --- Took a look. 2 seems to be the right answer. There is only the parent

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-21194) Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Artem Ervits reassigned HBASE-21194: Assignee: Artem Ervits > Add TestCopyTable which exercises MOB feature >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21341) DeadServer shouldn't import unshaded Preconditions

2018-10-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655837#comment-16655837 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21341: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21288) HostingServer in UnassignProcedure is not accurate

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655827#comment-16655827 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21288: Results for branch branch-2.1 [build #485 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21288) HostingServer in UnassignProcedure is not accurate

2018-10-18 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655805#comment-16655805 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-21288: Results for branch branch-2.0 [build #970 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655789#comment-16655789 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11747: [~stack] A state table is an interesting idea. If

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Artem Ervits resolved HBASE-21343. -- Resolution: Invalid > hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655778#comment-16655778 ] stack commented on HBASE-11747: --- [~apurtell] Thanks for chiming in. Agree. This is the RS heartbeating the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655773#comment-16655773 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11747: The best part about the incidents I mention is it was

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655771#comment-16655771 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-11747: [~stack] We had an interesting production problem where

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655767#comment-16655767 ] stack commented on HBASE-21343: --- Thanks for taking a look. It is an awkward issue. We can't let external

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21263) Mention compression algorithm along with other storefile details

2018-10-18 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655765#comment-16655765 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-21263: Seems I misapplied the patch to branch-1.4. I needed

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655764#comment-16655764 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21343: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655761#comment-16655761 ] Artem Ervits commented on HBASE-21343: -- you're right [~stack] it broke my local build. I'll close

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655757#comment-16655757 ] stack commented on HBASE-11747: --- Servers have ~1800 regions each. > ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread Artem Ervits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Artem Ervits updated HBASE-21343: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655754#comment-16655754 ] stack commented on HBASE-11747: --- I've been running into this. Complaint is: {code} 2018-10-18

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-11747: -- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-11747) ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-11747: -- Summary: ClusterStatus (heartbeat) is too bulky (was: ClusterStatus is too bulky ) > ClusterStatus

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread Mike Drob (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655732#comment-16655732 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-21342: --- {quote} + private static byte[] value2 = Bytes.toBytes("t2"); +

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21343) hbase-rest shouldn't import unshaded protobuf

2018-10-18 Thread stack (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655730#comment-16655730 ] stack commented on HBASE-21343: --- Are you sure here [~dbist13]? If it uses shaded protobuf, it will break

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread mazhenlin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655712#comment-16655712 ] mazhenlin commented on HBASE-21342: --- [~mdrob] Thank you. I will submit my patch tomorrow. Right now I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21342) FileSystem in use may get closed by other bulk load call in secure bulkLoad

2018-10-18 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16655710#comment-16655710 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-21342: {code} +import org.apache.commons.collections.map.HashedMap; {code} Did

  1   2   3   >