[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16360087#comment-16360087
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
TestClientPushback is a flaky test, sometimes passes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16360410#comment-16360410
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
QA passed. Any additional comments on the code?
I plan to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16362160#comment-16362160
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
I have updated the release notes, please see if this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Release Note:
A region is flushed if its memory component exceeds the region flush threshold.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Release Note:
A region is flushed if its memory component exceeds the region flush threshold.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16363845#comment-16363845
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Stack the barriers for the RS (global) level are more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16364463#comment-16364463
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Following a comment by Anoop on RB I made some additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Reduce global heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.branch-2.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16368549#comment-16368549
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Pushed to master and branch-2.
No test failures on master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16376526#comment-16376526
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20074:
---
Here is a summary of the throughput results of write-only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16376551#comment-16376551
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20074:
---
So I would suggest to go with option 1 as first step.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16376594#comment-16376594
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20074:
---
Gali already tried it and didn't see any change in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.11.patch
Test passes locally, trying to re-submit
> Reduce global
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16303629#comment-16303629
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
I did not change the global level - see current patch in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305325#comment-16305325
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Thanks [~stack] for the document, I think its a good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.12.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16303858#comment-16303858
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
QA passed
I would like to commit this in the next few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305509#comment-16305509
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Thank you [~anoop.hbase] for explaining. I think I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16305641#comment-16305641
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
OK let me prepare the patch.
> Reduce global heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.11.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16304443#comment-16304443
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Thanks all for the reviews, attached a new patch with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.13.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16300507#comment-16300507
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-18294:
---
Hey [~jmspaggi],
We are definitely going to use the 128MB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16376005#comment-16376005
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20074:
---
There are two options for handling this:
(1) leave one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16563885#comment-16563885
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Hi, [~stack] I noticed you posted some additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16532354#comment-16532354
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542:
---
No the threshold is already set in TestHStore. It failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538313#comment-16538313
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542:
---
TestHStore overrides the internal implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16539724#comment-16539724
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542:
---
Pushed to master and branch-2
> Better heap utilization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20542:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20542.master.005-addendum.patch
> Better heap utilization for IMC with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20542:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened)
> Better heap utilization for IMC with MSLABs
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20542:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20542-addendum.master.005.patch
> Better heap utilization for IMC with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16536901#comment-16536901
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20542:
---
I will fix the style error and will commit the addendum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.master.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-18294.01.patch)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.16.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-18294:
--
Attachment: HBASE-18294.01.patch
> Reduce global heap pressure: flush based on heap occupancy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16395229#comment-16395229
]
Eshcar Hillel edited comment on HBASE-20090 at 3/12/18 1:27 PM:
I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16395229#comment-16395229
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
I am trying to see if I understand correctly the discussed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397017#comment-16397017
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
So the suggested solution in v7 is to add region A into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397086#comment-16397086
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
yes to this set
> Properly handle Preconditions check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397075#comment-16397075
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
What can go wrong if you do not add A into the list (just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398277#comment-16398277
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
I am still not convinced it is necessary. You are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398504#comment-16398504
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
Yes, actually it makes sense to have all candidates sorted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16400190#comment-16400190
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
Still I am not convinced the code in the last patch covers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16400196#comment-16400196
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20196:
---
The code
{code:java}
if (!sortedRegions.containsKey(size))
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: HBase 2.0 performance evaluation - 8GB(1).pdf
> [TESTING] Performance
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16432783#comment-16432783
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Attaching additional benchmark results where we update and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16433700#comment-16433700
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Just to summarize the results again --
We see that in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16433704#comment-16433704
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
re-attaching [^workloadx] from the most recent experiment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: workloadx
> [TESTING] Performance
> -
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16433710#comment-16433710
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
And another thing, might be just a distraction but we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16434384#comment-16434384
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
vq. I should add workloadx to the suite of tests I'm
Eshcar Hillel created HBASE-20390:
-
Summary: IMC Default Parameters for 2.0.0
Key: HBASE-20390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20390:
--
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Task)
Parent: HBASE-20188
> IMC Default Parameters for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel reassigned HBASE-20390:
-
Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
> IMC Default Parameters for 2.0.0
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435236#comment-16435236
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
We also ran the same experiments in HDD machines and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16434384#comment-16434384
]
Eshcar Hillel edited comment on HBASE-20188 at 4/12/18 9:25 AM:
bq. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16437794#comment-16437794
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
[~anoop.hbase] can you post the command line or script +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: HBase 2.0 performance evaluation - 8GB.pdf
> [TESTING] Performance
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: hbase-site.xml
workloadx
HBASE-20188-xac.sh
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16431148#comment-16431148
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
I attached the results of some additional experiments we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426130#comment-16426130
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
I am trying to write a new workload that applies client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426134#comment-16426134
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
This is the code that initiates {{bufferedMutator}} in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426168#comment-16426168
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
I am running hbase12 client
This is the code of the client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16440582#comment-16440582
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
[~anoop.hbase] can you share the exact command line you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20390:
--
Release Note:
Changing in-memory compaction (IMC) defaults:
(1) active segment is 2% of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20390:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20390-branch-2.0-01.patch
> IMC Default Parameters for 2.0.0
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16445547#comment-16445547
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20455:
---
In your experiment with workloadx you use buffer size=2MB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20390:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20390.branch-2.0.002.patch
> IMC Default Parameters for 2.0.0
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16439140#comment-16439140
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20411:
---
I briefly went over the code in RB.
Did you had a chance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16417228#comment-16417228
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20236:
---
I can take a look into this.
I see the semaphor used in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16418735#comment-16418735
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
One way to explain the poor performance of reads with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412807#comment-16412807
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Something to consider:
When I ran the experiments to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412792#comment-16412792
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Stack the table with throughput and latency numbers you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16422176#comment-16422176
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
I agree the read performance degradation shown in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16422191#comment-16422191
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20259:
---
I also added a comment in RB – the description of Adaptive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20188.sh
> [TESTING] Performance
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20188:
--
Attachment: HBase 2.0 performance evaluation - Basic vs None_ system
settings.pdf
> [TESTING]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424604#comment-16424604
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Attached are the results of evaluations over *SSD*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16425146#comment-16425146
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
bq. can you please share how can we switch on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16425142#comment-16425142
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
{quote}Did you use hbase defaults or did you change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403904#comment-16403904
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
Another reason flushes are too slow could be the disk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403890#comment-16403890
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-19639:
---
[~stack] any chance you can attach here the entire log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403909#comment-16403909
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20196:
---
+1
> Maintain all regions with same size in memstore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403908#comment-16403908
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20090:
---
+1
> Properly handle Preconditions check failure in
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16406124#comment-16406124
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-19639:
---
I might have misinterpreted a line in the log. How would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16406022#comment-16406022
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-19639:
---
Thanks [~stack]
I went over the log - didn't see any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16409243#comment-16409243
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20188:
---
What does load (in YCSB_load) stands for?
Which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16376763#comment-16376763
]
Eshcar Hillel commented on HBASE-20074:
---
Code solves the problem but still a warning in the report.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eshcar Hillel updated HBASE-20542:
--
Attachment: HBASE-20542.branch-2.005.patch
> Better heap utilization for IMC with MSLABs
>
601 - 700 of 706 matches
Mail list logo