[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266212#comment-13266212
]
stack commented on HBASE-5911:
--
We have this in trunk Jimmy...
{code}
// Process
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5901:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Retrying. I tried the failing tests local and they pass for me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5901:
-
Attachment: hbase-5901.txt
Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5901:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266235#comment-13266235
]
stack commented on HBASE-5856:
--
So, can we close out this issue binlijin ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266251#comment-13266251
]
stack commented on HBASE-2214:
--
+1 on patch . Mind rebasing to trunk Ferdy so I can apply?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266256#comment-13266256
]
stack commented on HBASE-5732:
--
@Deveraj We ship with 3.4.x but do not require that you run a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5869:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Move SplitLogManager splitlog taskstate and AssignmentManager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266629#comment-13266629
]
stack commented on HBASE-5869:
--
I don't follow. Please give example illustrating the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5869:
-
Attachment: v13.txt
Retry to see if hadoopqa will pick it up.
Move SplitLogManager splitlog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5869:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Move SplitLogManager splitlog taskstate and AssignmentManager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266659#comment-13266659
]
stack commented on HBASE-5869:
--
If a DE comes out, I don't think it a good idea that we cut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1322#comment-1322
]
stack commented on HBASE-5915:
--
It looks great Todd.
This is funny (when wrong-endian) -- +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1325#comment-1325
]
stack commented on HBASE-5898:
--
j-d Can you run your blockcache cache checker against this?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5869:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266723#comment-13266723
]
stack commented on HBASE-5840:
--
As Ram discovered, I committed this to trunk as part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266725#comment-13266725
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
Hmm... did I? It doesn't list the files above. Let me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266732#comment-13266732
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
Ok. Over in hbase-5840 I say I'm going to leave it in but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266735#comment-13266735
]
stack commented on HBASE-5548:
--
Backed out the miscommit of hbase-5840 that went in with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266736#comment-13266736
]
stack commented on HBASE-5840:
--
Changed my mind. Backed out the miscommit of this trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266773#comment-13266773
]
stack commented on HBASE-5869:
--
No. I committed the patch that passed hadoopqa. Will do new
stack created HBASE-5919:
Summary: Add missing Ted review fixes for HBASE-5869
Key: HBASE-5919
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-4990:
-
Attachment: 4990v2.txt
Version two; worked on it w/ Andrew sitting beside me.
Document secure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-4990.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Committed to trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5919:
-
Attachment: 5919.txt
Address issues raised by Ted over in hbase-5869 that I did not want to address
there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5919:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Add missing Ted review fixes for HBASE-5869
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266981#comment-13266981
]
stack commented on HBASE-5919:
--
Review how this method is called. Look up in the file two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13266998#comment-13266998
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
When does this issue arise? When we try to getclosest on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267002#comment-13267002
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267015#comment-13267015
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
Hmm... maybe your fix is right. There are other tests of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267040#comment-13267040
]
stack commented on HBASE-5444:
--
Is v6 what is up in rb? And you've submitted it to hadoopqa?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack reassigned HBASE-5919:
Assignee: Ted Yu
I thought this was my issue but you seem to have taken it over Ted. Assigning
you.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267156#comment-13267156
]
stack commented on HBASE-5444:
--
Sorry Gregory, I meant to ask, would you like me commit this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267163#comment-13267163
]
stack commented on HBASE-5919:
--
None.
Add fixes for Ted's review comments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5922:
-
Attachment: HBASE-5922.patch
Retry
HalfStoreFileReader seekBefore causes StackOverflowError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5922:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
HalfStoreFileReader seekBefore causes StackOverflowError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5922:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
HalfStoreFileReader seekBefore causes StackOverflowError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267178#comment-13267178
]
stack commented on HBASE-5913:
--
+1 on patch
Speed up the full scan of META
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267187#comment-13267187
]
stack commented on HBASE-5918:
--
Shouldn't we remove the setting of this flag that happens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267189#comment-13267189
]
stack commented on HBASE-5444:
--
@Gregory np Please file the other issues. Waiting on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267198#comment-13267198
]
stack commented on HBASE-5916:
--
Tell us more Ram. If new regionserver comes in and we split
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267209#comment-13267209
]
stack commented on HBASE-5875:
--
The patch looks dodgy -- saying a region is online, if it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267214#comment-13267214
]
stack commented on HBASE-5916:
--
bq. So though the server is online i will not be able to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267228#comment-13267228
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
@Anoop Its late, but what you say makes sense. Looking over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267232#comment-13267232
]
stack commented on HBASE-5916:
--
Well, thats useful, right? Its useful in case where a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5444:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267243#comment-13267243
]
stack commented on HBASE-5918:
--
@Chunhui I suppose so Its just odd have flags set in such
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267568#comment-13267568
]
stack commented on HBASE-5923:
--
This patch is great. Thanks for going back and doing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267593#comment-13267593
]
stack commented on HBASE-5923:
--
bq. That also means that is 0.94 there would be a dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267743#comment-13267743
]
stack commented on HBASE-5883:
--
Can't we at least check the message to ensure its what we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267744#comment-13267744
]
stack commented on HBASE-5928:
--
+1 on patch.
Jon Hsieh?
Hbck shouldn't npe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267753#comment-13267753
]
stack commented on HBASE-5929:
--
This seems uninterpretable as table name or region name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5931:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267787#comment-13267787
]
stack commented on HBASE-5877:
--
You don't want to have RegionMovedException carry a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267869#comment-13267869
]
stack commented on HBASE-5883:
--
Your argument is that it is ok to compound a flaw because we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5911?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5911:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Applied to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267881#comment-13267881
]
stack commented on HBASE-5889:
--
BenoƮt knows about the coming pb conversion and is good w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5886:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.96.0
Leaving open till we figure if it belongs in 0.94.1
Add new metric for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267919#comment-13267919
]
stack commented on HBASE-5886:
--
Committed to trunk. Want this is 0.94 Lars?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267925#comment-13267925
]
stack commented on HBASE-5907:
--
@Kannan That is pretty. +1 again. Let me know if you want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267930#comment-13267930
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
Can we write a test where we have a multi-block hfile (can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267933#comment-13267933
]
stack commented on HBASE-5732:
--
DD, you can comment over in rb too -- that'd be better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13267934#comment-13267934
]
stack commented on HBASE-5924:
--
+1
In the client code, don't wait for all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5902:
-
Attachment: 5902v2.txt
Same as N's patch but we leave out hbase-config.sh. This ok by you N?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268006#comment-13268006
]
stack commented on HBASE-5876:
--
+1 on patch
TestImportExport has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268102#comment-13268102
]
stack commented on HBASE-5494:
--
bq. I think it makes sense to have a separate JIRA (or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268110#comment-13268110
]
stack commented on HBASE-5699:
--
@Li You should be able to work whereever you like if you make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268113#comment-13268113
]
stack commented on HBASE-5494:
--
@Alex Sounds good. I can help out getting this into trunk w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268126#comment-13268126
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
bq. What about you Stack?
I'm staying out of you fellas'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5922:
-
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
HalfStoreFileReader seekBefore causes StackOverflowError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5902:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.94.1
0.96.0
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268431#comment-13268431
]
stack commented on HBASE-5894:
--
+1 on patch
Delete table failed but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5844:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to trunk. Thanks for the patch N.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268452#comment-13268452
]
stack commented on HBASE-5883:
--
Should we remove this too?
{code}
+} else if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268666#comment-13268666
]
stack commented on HBASE-5889:
--
Is this good to go in Jimmy? What comments did you address?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268732#comment-13268732
]
stack commented on HBASE-5889:
--
The util is for serverside though? If not, if for client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5943:
-
Assignee: stack
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Set tcpnodelay as default
stack created HBASE-5943:
Summary: Set tcpnodelay as default
Key: HBASE-5943
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5943
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: stack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5943:
-
Attachment: nodelay.txt
Set tcpnodelay as default
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268806#comment-13268806
]
stack commented on HBASE-5889:
--
I can't tell highlevel what you've done Jimmy? I see
stack created HBASE-5944:
Summary: Convert rs, shutdown, and table dir content to pb
Key: HBASE-5944
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5944
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268810#comment-13268810
]
stack commented on HBASE-5446:
--
Here's whats up in zk as of trunk today:
{code}
[splitlog,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268895#comment-13268895
]
stack commented on HBASE-5889:
--
I think this not the best soln. but I'm not going to argue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5889:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change,Reviewed (was: Incompatible change)
Status:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269070#comment-13269070
]
stack commented on HBASE-5930:
--
Is our deferred flush == ASYNC described above?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269116#comment-13269116
]
stack commented on HBASE-5930:
--
I like idea of client saying whether to put it on deferred
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5945:
-
Priority: Critical (was: Minor)
Making critical so we don't overlook this work.
Reduce buffer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269128#comment-13269128
]
stack commented on HBASE-5945:
--
Looks great Todd.
Could we keep this DataOutputBuffer for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269722#comment-13269722
]
stack commented on HBASE-5945:
--
/me hearts todd
Reduce buffer copies in IPC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5952:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Committed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270006#comment-13270006
]
stack commented on HBASE-5922:
--
I'm good w/ committing v3 and opening a new issue to address
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270020#comment-13270020
]
stack commented on HBASE-5806:
--
@Chinna Very nice work. Thanks. I can wrap the long lines
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270035#comment-13270035
]
stack commented on HBASE-5948:
--
+1
Deprecate and remove the Avro gateway
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270192#comment-13270192
]
stack commented on HBASE-5828:
--
Xufeng: If you want to experiment, add logging or whatever,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270200#comment-13270200
]
stack commented on HBASE-5953:
--
Agreed. Its state should be out in zk anyways rather than an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270235#comment-13270235
]
stack commented on HBASE-4336:
--
I took a look. We need to just bite the bullet. Lets start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5877:
-
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
When a query fails because the region has moved, let the regionserver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5877:
-
Attachment: 5877-v17.txt
Retry
When a query fails because the region has moved, let the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-5877:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
When a query fails because the region has moved, let the regionserver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270258#comment-13270258
]
stack commented on HBASE-5925:
--
I sort of follow. I don't understand the bit where you say
201 - 300 of 38916 matches
Mail list logo