[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14723037#comment-14723037
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-1575:
--
Does it make sense to set the default value of failover timeout to a large
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14722972#comment-14722972
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3336:
--
[~vinodkone] any comments on this? Thanks!
> Remove TEARDOWN endpoint
>
gyliu created MESOS-3336:
Summary: Remove TEARDOWN endpoint
Key: MESOS-3336
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3336
Project: Mesos
Issue Type: Bug
Components: HTTP API
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14711877#comment-14711877
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3240:
--
A patch is here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14699548#comment-14699548
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3037:
--
QUIESCE call https://reviews.apache.org/r/37532/
Add a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14700154#comment-14700154
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3070:
--
I think that you should use v1 API for unit test now?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gyliu updated MESOS-3037:
-
Summary: Add a QUIESCE call to the scheduler (was: Add a SUPPRESS call to
the scheduler)
Add a QUIESCE call to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14698894#comment-14698894
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3037:
--
There will be some function conflict with signals.hpp if use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14697226#comment-14697226
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3261:
--
A patch is ready for review
gyliu created MESOS-3261:
Summary: Move QoS plug-ins to a specified folder like
resource_estimator
Key: MESOS-3261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3261
Project: Mesos
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662921#comment-14662921
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3241:
--
This is a duplicate with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662970#comment-14662970
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3240:
--
Aditi, can you please show some use case for your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14663058#comment-14663058
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3037:
--
Just uploaded a new patch https://reviews.apache.org/r/37257/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14662312#comment-14662312
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3075:
--
Seems duplicate. Also I think that SUPPRESS offer might be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14660100#comment-14660100
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3218:
--
The bootstrap is only for developers and it is not suggested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14625750#comment-14625750
]
gyliu commented on MESOS-3040:
--
The step 7 in submitting a patch is:
Make your changes to the
gyliu created MESOS-3040:
Summary: Update submitting-a-patch.md
Key: MESOS-3040
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3040
Project: Mesos
Issue Type: Documentation
Components:
17 matches
Mail list logo