Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/18
ok. So precise(12.04) does not work out of the box, only with add on
packages.
I think we should push this with 14.04 (travis' `dist: tahr`) and add 12.04
as a docker container
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/18
@apiri indeed. solving the INTERFACE was a matter of using what seems to be
called the "infamous `dummy.cpp `".
Good news is that this should be working now (it wor
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/512
@beugley doesn't seem to have worked yet
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/18
MINIFI-34 - attempt to progress the CMake environment
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi-minifi-cpp
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1108
By the way, most of these modifications are already available here:
https://github.com/trixpan/nifi/commits/NIFI-2565
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1108
You can certainly include a file with the default patterns, however you
should not hardcode them. By hardcoding them you prevent the user from
optimising for speed by removing unused patterns from
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/14
@apiri another note: Seems like CMake is a must before we get Windows build
in shape:
According to
[this](http://help.appveyor.com/discussions/problems/1467-building-with-makefile
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/17
@apiri we forgot this. :fearful:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/17
MINIFI-34 - Add Travis badge to README.md
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi-minifi-cpp MINIFI-34
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/16
no no. just thinking about getting travis-ci working asap. Once that is
done, evolving the work on #14 - i.e. CMake, windows, etc - should be easier
due to the ability of iterating code
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1105
@andrewmlim great. Thanks for the clarification. Will merge soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/16
once this is merged it should be easier to expand with CMake and different
environments. I am particularly keen to ensure we are able to generate both deb
and rpm files
---
If your project
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/16
@apiri LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/675
@apiri have a look on
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1092
and
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1093
Which are essentially addressing a number of the issues
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/675
@PuspenduBanerjee From what I understand from the trail, we can close PR?
Best regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/984
@ToivoAdams would you mind rebasing this PR?
Kind regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1073
@paulgibeault would you mind squashing this PR?
I thank you in advance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1093#discussion_r82104883
--- Diff:
nifi-bootstrap/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/bootstrap/RunNiFi.java ---
@@ -581,30 +585,31 @@ private Status getStatus(final Logger logger
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1081
@pvillard31 thanks for the code.
LGTM.
Will merge later today against master and check if I can apply against 0.x
as well.
Cheers
---
If your project is set up
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1108
@selim-namsi thanks for putting together. I was coding this processor but
happy to review it.
Few comments:
1. Your code is failing -Pcontrib-check. Can you please fix
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1103
@apiri - hopefully addressed most of the typos and comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1103#discussion_r81988084
--- Diff: .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+
+
+Thank you for submiting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
+
+In order
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1103
OMG... that's what happens when someone decides to type text into vi by
1AM... :smiley:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1103
@apiri I know this ticket is assigned to you but given I suspect how busy
your side of the ocean is, I thought I would give it a go and try to help.
Let me know if that is not ok and I
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1103
NIFI-1615 - Add initial GitHbub pull request template to address someâ¦
⦠of the reocurring PR mistakes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/409
merged. thanks for the contribution @pvillard31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/409
I will merge later today
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/626
@atilcock not sure why GitHub doesn't show but this PR drifted from the
master in the sense we no longer specify the hadoop version within the child
pom.xml
Also, while I am not an expert, I
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/409
LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/319
@JPercivall welcome back!
Could you rebase this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/512
@beugley would you mind rebasing this commit?
Cheers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
@olegz thanks.
I wasn't sure if the comment was referring to the Java 8 or the whole
thing. Thanks for clarifying and thank you for reviewing.
Cheers
---
If your project is set up
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
@olegz any feedback or :+1: ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083#discussion_r81533345
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/AbstractEmailProcessor.java
---
@@ -348,14
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083#discussion_r81531370
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/AbstractEmailProcessor.java
---
@@ -348,14
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083#discussion_r81531262
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/TestConsumeEmail.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,180
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083#discussion_r81530739
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-email-bundle/nifi-email-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/email/AbstractEmailProcessor.java
---
@@ -348,14
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/285
@rickysaltzer - is the PR still relevant? Would you mind if we close
otherwise?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/267
@jvwing - would you be able to rebase this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/254
@acesir wondering if you had time to rebase the PR so we can complete
review and possibly merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/188
@rickysaltzer - There has been a while since this PR was last updated. Is
it still needed? If not, would you mind if we close this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/587
@chagara - any chances of updating this README to match the version 1.0?
@alopresto @olegz - Do we have Spanish speaking committers? It would be
unfortunate to merge this but be unable
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1085#discussion_r81481431
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-ui/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/partials/provenance/provenance-content.jsp
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1085
@mcgilman would you mind having a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1085
@mcgillman would you mind having a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1085
@pvillard31 second and final part of the typo clean up. Would appreciate a
quick review so I don't need to spend eternity rebasing the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1085
NIFI-2816 - Clean typos across the code
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi typo2
Alternatively you can review
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785
@mattyb149 all feedback addressed.
this should be ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
@bbende code should pass contrib-check and be ready for review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1004
@bbende hopefully the second commit should address your feedback.
May I ask you to test and if ok, merge into master?
Kind regards
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1024
@apsaltis is the PR still required?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
User reveals patch works as expected:
https://community.hortonworks.com/comments/59274/view.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1054
@apiri done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
content no long loaded into memory. except for the issue around jUnits (2 &
3), it should be ready to review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
@bbende this should solve the IMAP issue.
Notes:
1. This PR reads the content of the message into memory, in contrast with
the original design that relied on InputStream to write
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1083
NIFI-2709 - Refactor ConsumeIMAP and ConsumePOP3 to generate RFC2822
compliant flowfiles
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1004
@bbende mind sharing the steps you took? Keen to try to reproduce and fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/817
@olegz I guess you have been busy but I was wondering if you are still
planning to review this?
Cheers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1054
@apiri should we go ahead and commit the PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785#discussion_r80934511
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/pom.xml ---
@@ -254,6 +254,17 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1059
not yet ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785#discussion_r80719887
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/pom.xml ---
@@ -254,6 +254,17 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785#discussion_r80663321
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ParseCEF.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,323
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785#discussion_r80663050
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestParseCEF.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user trixpan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1061
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user trixpan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1062
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057
@bbende there's a few hundred more but I decided to split the task to
avoid having to rebase non-stop! :sunglasses:
@joewitt pleased to help, next time the kangaroo steak bill is yours
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1061
because this is 0.x (and as such less likely to be under constant builds,
are you ok with us building without -T?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user trixpan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1060
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1060
I knew I had spotted that before the merge... weird stuff.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1060
wow... bizarre
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1060
github seems to be experiencing some issues. It should sync automagically
later on. Thanks for merging, will close the JIRA
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1062
Backport NIFI-2814 to 0.x tree
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi NIFI-2814v0.x
Alternatively you can review
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1061
Backport NIFI-2728 to 0.x tree
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi NIFI-2728v0.x
Alternatively you can review
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1060
NIFI-2821 - Convert DNS_TIMEOUT property to TIME_PERIOD
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi NIFI-2821
Alternatively
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057
@joewitt , @bbende
suggestions? comments?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/858
@pvillard31 thanks for finding this. Could not believe... missing curly
bracket after and else. :smile:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1059
NIFI-2818 - Minimise fs permission required by NiFi
1 - Replace a r/w test over $NIFI_HOME/lib that is performed
but never utilised by a RO test
2
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/985
@mcgilman would you mind pushing this commit to 0.x as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057
@pvillard31 I did a second sweep on this commit and the following public
classes or methods have also been changed
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1058
@apiri another small clean up activity.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057
@pvillard31 note to myself: Never try to hunt typos after midnight ...
:smiley:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057#discussion_r80344591
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-client-dto/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/dto/ControllerConfigurationDTO.java
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057#discussion_r80344580
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/parser/BinaryReader.java
---
@@ -86,9 +86,9
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057#discussion_r80344575
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-evtx-bundle/nifi-evtx-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/evtx/parser/BinaryReader.java
---
@@ -86,9 +86,9
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057#discussion_r80344540
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/util/crypto/bcrypt/BCrypt.java
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057#discussion_r80344174
--- Diff:
nifi-mock/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/util/MockProcessSession.java ---
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ public void commit() {
* {@link
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1057
NIFI-2816 - Clean typos across the code
part 1 of typo hunting
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trixpan/nifi typos
Alternatively
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80253235
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255471
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255200
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255224
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255251
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255166
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80255144
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047#discussion_r80253174
--- Diff: nifi-assembly/pom.xml ---
@@ -505,11 +510,18 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under
the License
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1049
@vegaed
not exactly... Assuming you are using Linux/MacOS/Unix, you can try this:
```
cd nifi
git checkout master
git checkout -b temp
git cherrypick 7ef2782
git
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/785
@mattyb149 PR rebased and in theory should be ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user trixpan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1054
Dummy commit focused in closing stalled PR requests
Closes: #239
Closes: #769
Closes: #595
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user trixpan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1047
@fidget83 would you mind amending the commit message and adding reference
to the JIRA you mentioned above?
You can do so by running `git commit --amend`
---
If your project is set up
401 - 500 of 658 matches
Mail list logo
