[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16372517#comment-16372517
]
Josef Zahner commented on NIFI-4898:
You were right, I was using a lot of custom NARs/JARs. So I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371889#comment-16371889
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4833:
--
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2478#discussion_r169749383
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/ScanHBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,562 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2443
@mattyb149 Passed the test and it says it's ready.
---
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
@markap14 yes... under this somewhat unusual circumstance, my proposed
solution would sacrifice data for consistency. However, if alwaysSync is set
false, there isn't a guarantee of no loss anyway.
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2478#discussion_r169732184
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/ScanHBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,562 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
Again, I would submit that it isn't violating the data loss guarantees of
the original implementation. Yes, some data could potentially be lost, but
none that it guaranteed to keep, and in doing so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Bende updated NIFIREG-147:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Add Keycloak authentication method
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371874#comment-16371874
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4775:
--
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371958#comment-16371958
]
Pierre Villard commented on NIFI-4898:
--
Hi [~jzahner], I'm not able to reproduce the issue on my side.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371966#comment-16371966
]
Pierre Villard commented on NIFI-4899:
--
This looks like as a truststore issue. Is it a cluster setup?
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
I'm glad there's support for making this opt in. One point on @joewitt 's
comment : "The claim of a simple fix being available to close the previous gaps
doesn't appear to be backed with a
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
@devriesb I believe the issue with this proposed solution is that if we
have 256 partitions (the default), for instance, then if one partition is not
flushed to disk during a power failure, we would
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448
@mattyb149 I'll rebase this one once #4827 is done. There's too much going
on in the same processor right now between these and the one just merged.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Villard updated NIFI-3502:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.6.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
I would not consider that circumstance to be unusual, but rather a common
scenario if power is lost, after NIFI-4775 has been implemented. Given that
NIFI-4775 was created and that there were no
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
The proposed solution does address the issue that was raised in NIFI-4774,
but in doing so introduces a new issue of data loss. This is why I provided the
solution that I did in the PR, as I believe
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
I'll grant NIFI-4775 may raise issues with my proposed solution. However,
there is a problem right now. My proposed solution addresses the problem right
now. Future modification may require
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371808#comment-16371808
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4833:
--
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371911#comment-16371911
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4774:
--
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371887#comment-16371887
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4827:
--
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371852#comment-16371852
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4775:
--
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
I am not opposed to providing a mechanism for opting out. I can look into
creating a new PR that will provide that.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371819#comment-16371819
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4838:
--
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371801#comment-16371801
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4827:
--
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2443
@mattyb149 Rebased and pushed. Building now.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371788#comment-16371788
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4894:
--
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Aslan updated NIFI-4894:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> nf-canvas-utils#queryBulletins does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Aslan updated NIFI-4894:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.6.0
> nf-canvas-utils#queryBulletins does not account for possible proxy path
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371778#comment-16371778
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4894:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2482
Thanks @jtstorck! Thanks @mcgilman this has been merged to master.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2482
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371772#comment-16371772
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4894:
--
Github user jtstorck commented on the issue:
Github user jtstorck commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2482
@mcgilman @scottyaslan I was able to reproduce the bug in master while
proxying with Knox by creating a HandleHttpRequest processor with a
StandardHttpContextMap controller service. Attempting to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4815:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Add EL support to ExecuteProcess
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
+1 to @joewitt 's comments on allowing opt-out or selection of the
implementation. I'm good with this being the default going forward, but I think
the other impl(s) should be available to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371745#comment-16371745
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4815:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4815:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.6.0
> Add EL support to ExecuteProcess
>
>
>
Github user joewitt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
It definitely requires considerable testing. Burgess clearly did testing
during his code review and he had favorable findings. Mark obviously did. I
personally spent multiple weeks in long running
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2432
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371741#comment-16371741
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4815:
--
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371742#comment-16371742
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFIREG-120:
Github user Chaffelson commented on a diff in the pull
Github user Chaffelson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/89#discussion_r169721507
--- Diff: nifi-registry-docker/dockerhub/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+
+
+# Docker Image Quickstart
+
+## Capabilities
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2432
+1 from me as well, everything's working nicely. Thanks for the
improvement! Merging to master
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/267
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aldrin Piri updated MINIFICPP-409:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Remove unused artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aldrin Piri updated MINIFICPP-408:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5.0
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371696#comment-16371696
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-409:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371692#comment-16371692
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-409:
--
Github user apiri commented on the issue:
Github user apiri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/267
Travis looks good outside of a hiccup on the one OS X run from the
environment (all tests but the last executed and passed).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aldrin Piri resolved MINIFICPP-406.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.5.0
> Change StreamFactory to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371682#comment-16371682
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-406:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/265
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sivaprasanna Sethuraman reassigned NIFI-543:
Assignee: Sivaprasanna Sethuraman (was: Andre F de Miranda)
> Provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371675#comment-16371675
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4839:
--
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
Github user pvillard31 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2477
@bbende agree with your points: we can keep things as-is for now and have a
larger effort for documentation with follow-up JIRAs.
@aperepel I *really* believe that online documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371636#comment-16371636
]
Brandon DeVries commented on NIFI-4774:
---
-1. I was under the impression the PR for this was still a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371626#comment-16371626
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4815:
--
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2432
Thanks for the review @MikeThomsen ! I'll give it a try too and merge after
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4814:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Add distinctive attribute to S2S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4814:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.6.0
> Add distinctive attribute to S2S reporting tasks
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371607#comment-16371607
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4814:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2431
---
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2431
+1 LGTM, ran all three reporting tasks and verified the attributes are
present and correct. Thanks for the improvement! Merging to master
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371605#comment-16371605
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4814:
--
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
Github user devriesb commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2416
So, I was under the impression this was still a WIP. I am a HUGE -1 on
this change. As @markap14 stated above, this is a critical section of code.
And while the previous version has serious
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2482
@mcgilman I have reviewed and built these changes and all looks good.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371585#comment-16371585
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4894:
--
Github user scottyaslan commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371566#comment-16371566
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4833:
--
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2478#discussion_r169680760
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/TestScanHBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@
+/*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371558#comment-16371558
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4833:
--
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user bdesert commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2478#discussion_r169677516
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-hbase-bundle/nifi-hbase-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/hbase/TestScanHBase.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@
+/*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371554#comment-16371554
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-397:
--
GitHub user achristianson opened a pull request:
GitHub user achristianson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/268
MINIFICPP-397 Added implementation of RouteOnAttribute
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi - MiNiFi C++.
In order to streamline the review of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4816:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.6.0
> Changes to ReportingTask name are not available to the ReportingTask
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Burgess updated NIFI-4816:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Changes to ReportingTask name are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371495#comment-16371495
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4816:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2452
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
marco polo updated MINIFICPP-410:
-
Summary: MQTT should use controller service instead of a manual SSL
configuration (was: MQTT
marco polo created MINIFICPP-410:
Summary: MQTT should use controller service instead of
Key: MINIFICPP-410
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-410
Project: NiFi MiNiFi C++
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
marco polo updated MINIFICPP-410:
-
Summary: MQTT should use controller service instead of a manual SSL
configuratino (was: MQTT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
marco polo updated MINIFICPP-410:
-
Summary: MQTT should use controller service instead of a manual SSL
configuratin (was: MQTT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371489#comment-16371489
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4901:
--
GitHub user gardellajuanpablo opened a pull request:
GitHub user gardellajuanpablo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2486
NIFI-4901 Json to Avro using Record framework does not support union â¦
â¦types with boolean
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Payne updated NIFI-4902:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> ConsumeAMQP and PublishAMQP use a single connection, which results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371488#comment-16371488
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4902:
--
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2485
NIFI-4902: Updated ConsumeAMQP, PublishAMQP to use one connection perâ¦
⦠concurrent task instead of a single connection shared by all concurrent
tasks. This offers far better throughput when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371483#comment-16371483
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4838:
--
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371481#comment-16371481
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4827:
--
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448
Will do.
---
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2443
NP. I'll try to get that done in a little bit.
---
Mark Payne created NIFI-4902:
Summary: ConsumeAMQP and PublishAMQP use a single connection,
which results in poor performance
Key: NIFI-4902
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4902
Project:
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2452
@mattyb149 this looks good to me now! Thanks for updating. I'm not in a
position to merge right now, but I will give it a +1 if you want to merge
yourself. Otherwise I will merge when I get my local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371471#comment-16371471
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4816:
--
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gardella Juan Pablo updated NIFI-4901:
--
Description:
Given the following valid Avro Schema:
{code}
{
"type":"record",
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371459#comment-16371459
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4838:
--
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2448
Since #2180 was merged, there are conflicts, mind rebasing against the
latest master? Please and thanks!
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16371457#comment-16371457
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4839:
--
Github user aperepel commented on the issue:
Github user aperepel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2477
@pvillard31 we were discussing a modular design for commands with dynamic
discovery/loading (e.g. via Java's ServiceLoader mechanism). This is to support
the idea that we should try to incorporate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gardella Juan Pablo updated NIFI-4901:
--
Description:
Given the following valid Avro Schema:
{code}
{
"type":"record",
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
