[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2023-01-05 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1372398279 @exceptionfactory Is there anything else that needs to be done for this PR? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2023-01-03 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1370134527 @exceptionfactory I noticed the build ci-workflow / Ubuntu Zulu JDK 11 HI failed but it failed on a unit test unrelated to my changes. Also the ci-workflow / Ubuntu Zulu JDK 17 EN timed out.

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-12-28 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1366789116 @exceptionfactory I added the null literal as you requested and modified the documentation to reflect this. Please let me know if my changes are what you were intending. Thanks! -- This

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1364270877 @exceptionfactory I am fine with only implementing the the seven argument constructor. What did you have in mind for implementing a literal null as a function argument? I only question if it

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1364180293 > Thanks for clarifying the intent @dan-s1, constructing the complete URI in a single function makes sense. > > With that background, do you need all of the possible constructor

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1363956081 > Thanks for working on this new feature @dan-s1. Although most of the implementation makes sense, it raises some questions about treating blanks strings as nulls. Although the

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-12-22 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1363125181 @exceptionfactory Wondering if this could be revisited. It is functionality my team could use. Thanks! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-11-29 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1330825220 @exceptionfactory Now that 1.19.0 has been released, when you have some time can you please review this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [nifi] dan-s1 commented on pull request #6689: [NIFI-10754] Initial check in of new getUri NIFI Expression Language …

2022-11-21 Thread GitBox
dan-s1 commented on PR #6689: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/6689#issuecomment-1322669243 @exceptionfactory If you have time, can you please review this in order for this to get into 1.19? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,