rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r499987120
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -216,3 +218,9 @@ echo $(tput setaf 6)
echo run the following command to remove the scratch space:
echo " r
style95 commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500014091
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -216,3 +218,9 @@ echo $(tput setaf 6)
echo run the following command to remove the scratch space:
echo "
shazron opened a new pull request #4991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991
See https://github.com/docker/for-win/issues/7898
See https://github.com/adobe/aio-cli-plugin-app/issues/304
## Description
The Windows docker.exe location has been change
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500037641
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500038477
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500037641
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500038477
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500037641
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500037966
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -212,7 +214,15 @@ packageJsonCheckVersion "$DIR/$BASE/package.json" $V
printf "scanning package-lock.json fo
style95 commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500050275
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
style95 commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500054944
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4855#discussion_r499346321
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ParameterEncryption.scala
##
@@ -26,79 +26,85 @@ import javax.crypto.spec.{G
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#discussion_r500246386
##
File path: tools/rcverify.sh
##
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ V=${3?"missing version e.g., '3.19.0'"}
# the release candidate, usualy 'rc1'
RC=${4:-rc1}
rabbah commented on pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349#issuecomment-704244783
> One thing to note is, this feature will be enabled by default.
Sorry I missed that.
This is an a
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #4855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4855#discussion_r500248667
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ParameterEncryption.scala
##
@@ -26,79 +26,85 @@ import javax.crypto.spec.{GC
mrutkows edited a comment on pull request #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4990#issuecomment-704417367
@rraavi @rabbah This indeed appears to fix the issue as described (since the
regex for `parseActionUrl()` would fail otherwise). Just concerned that the
action url may
mrutkows commented on pull request #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4990#issuecomment-704417367
@rraavi @rabbah This indeed appears to fix the issue as described since the
regex for `parseActionUrl()` would fail. Just concerned that the action url may
have a hardcoded p
style95 merged pull request #349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/349
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
codecov-io commented on pull request #4991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991#issuecomment-704670957
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991?src=pr&el=h1)
Report
> :exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base
(`master@ef55353`). [Click h
shazron commented on pull request #4991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991#issuecomment-704675573
The tests pass now (I fixed the Scala formatting).
For reference for others, to fix Scala formatting issues:
```
./gradlew checkScalaFmt
./gradelw scalaFmt
``
shazron edited a comment on pull request #4991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991#issuecomment-704675573
The tests pass now (I fixed the Scala formatting).
For reference for others, to fix Scala formatting issues:
```
./gradelw scalaFmt
# should pass now
.
mhenke1 opened a new pull request #94:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/94
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
mhenke1 merged pull request #94:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/94
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #4954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4954#discussion_r501033987
##
File path:
core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/InvokerReactive.scala
##
@@ -179,58 +234,7 @@ class InvokerReactive(
rabbah merged pull request #4991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4991
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
rabbah commented on pull request #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4990#issuecomment-704970992
@mrutkows I checked the source, didn't find any other references.
This is an automated message from the Apa
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #4972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4972#discussion_r501055677
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/http/ErrorResponse.scala
##
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ object Messages {
/** Standard message
mrutkows merged pull request #4990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4990
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
rabbah commented on pull request #4972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4972#issuecomment-704973786
As noted by @dgrove-oss and @bdoyle0182 each controller lacks total
knowledge about the activation counts per namespace. This message will even
vary per controller depending on
dyllandry opened a new pull request #316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316
This PR fixes a bad file name.
The issue https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306 reports
that `make add-catalog` fails because this file's name does not match what it
dyllandry commented on issue #306:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-704977689
I created a PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316 in the
repo that contains this file. I figured the problem is with them since the file
name here follo
rabbah commented on issue #306:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-704987987
Using github search there are several locations that use existing name:
https://github.com/search?q=installCatalogUsingWskdeploy.sh&type=code
I wonder if fixing the
rabbah commented on pull request #316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316#issuecomment-704988134
I posted a comment
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-704987987.
This
rabbah commented on pull request #316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316#issuecomment-704988562
Thanks Dyllan for the patch.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#discussion_r501101156
##
File path:
core/scheduler/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/scheduler/SchedulerServer.scala
##
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
dyllandry commented on issue #306:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-705024861
It looks like a lot of results in your search clone this repo's main branch.
If that PR was approved and it got merged, it would immediately break each of
those projects
dyllandry edited a comment on issue #306:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-705024861
It looks like a lot of results in your search clone this repo's main branch.
If that PR was approved and it got merged, it would immediately break each of
those pr
dyllandry commented on pull request #316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316#issuecomment-705025554
According to @rabbah's comment
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/306#issuecomment-704987987
, I really do not like the sound of approving this PR.
dyllandry closed pull request #316:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-catalog/pull/316
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
dyllandry opened a new pull request #324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/pull/324
`installCatalogUsingWskDeploy.sh` isn't actually the name of the file in
that repo. It's similar, but the actual file name has a lower case 'd' in
'deploy'.
This PR addresses https:/
dyllandry commented on issue #320:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/320#issuecomment-705053541
Hopefully bumping this will get it more attention. That commit adds a few
required vars that I do not know where to get.
dyllandry opened a new issue #325:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/325
I'd like to develop openwhisk functions that work off of alarms. I can't do
that, the installation for the feed provider fails.
According to the readme, we can run `make create-provider-al
rabbah merged pull request #324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/pull/324
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4954#discussion_r501405773
##
File path:
core/invoker/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/invoker/InvokerReactive.scala
##
@@ -164,6 +164,62 @@ class InvokerReactive(
pri
style95 commented on issue #320:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/320#issuecomment-705286727
@Keonhee
Could you take a look at this?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To res
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#discussion_r501440428
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/connector/Message.scala
##
@@ -426,3 +426,16 @@ object EventMessage extends Default
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#discussion_r501442446
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/connector/Message.scala
##
@@ -426,3 +426,16 @@ object EventMessage extends Default
style95 closed pull request #4984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4984
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
KeonHee commented on issue #320:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/320#issuecomment-705365504
Ok I will try to handle this issue.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
style95 closed pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/440
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
style95 closed pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/440
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request #350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/350
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
cirium-ts opened a new issue #4992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4992
Why is gradle taking 4 minutes in the Model Configuration step for me?
Here is an uploaded scan of a build I did at the cygwin prompt. I am on
Windows, and have had similar timing issues using Window
jiangpengcheng commented on a change in pull request #4986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4986#discussion_r502127875
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala
##
@@ -548,8 +632,12 @@ object WhiskAction extends
jiangpengcheng commented on a change in pull request #4986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4986#discussion_r502128037
##
File path:
core/controller/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/controller/Actions.scala
##
@@ -216,11 +224,23 @@ trait WhiskActionsApi e
jiangpengcheng commented on pull request #4986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4986#issuecomment-705919648
> Can we add creating a max version limit to todo? This is especially
important if not supplying a version creates a new version on every action
post, users will end up
style95 closed pull request #440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/440
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
KeonHee commented on issue #320:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/320#issuecomment-705365504
Ok I will try to handle this issue.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#discussion_r501440428
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/connector/Message.scala
##
@@ -426,3 +426,16 @@ object EventMessage extends Default
style95 closed pull request #4984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4984
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
jiangpengcheng commented on a change in pull request #4986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4986#discussion_r502127875
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala
##
@@ -548,8 +632,12 @@ object WhiskAction extends
jiangpengcheng commented on pull request #4986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4986#issuecomment-705919648
> Can we add creating a max version limit to todo? This is especially
important if not supplying a version creates a new version on every action
post, users will end up
dgrove-oss merged pull request #350:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/350
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
rraavi commented on pull request #4972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4972#issuecomment-706370891
So, close the linked PR right?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mes
bdoyle0182 opened a new issue #4993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4993
Problem:
Our openwhisk operation is strictly through a management orchestration layer
built on top of openwhisk. We strictly use non-blocking activations, which
requires us to get notification
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request #644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/644
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/449
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
UR
dgrove-oss merged pull request #644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/644
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/645
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
dgrove-oss merged pull request #449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/449
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
crazyzcc619 opened a new issue #4994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4994
## Environment details:
* local deployment, native ubuntu, Mac OS, Kubernetes, ...
* version of docker, ubuntu, ...
## Steps to reproduce the issue:
1.
2.
3.
crazyzcc619 commented on issue #4994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4994#issuecomment-706520814
Is there a great god to help
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
crazyzcc619 removed a comment on issue #4994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4994#issuecomment-706520814
Is there a great god to help
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
crazyzcc619 commented on issue #4994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4994#issuecomment-706520864
Is there a great god to help
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
crazyzcc619 opened a new issue #326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/326
The function can be created, but cannot run, prompt
"The server is currently unavailable (because it is overloaded or down for
maintenance)."
-
rabbah opened a new pull request #93:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/93
The non-action loop based proxies are not being maintained. They are
replaced by their action loop counterparts.
This PR removes the relevant docker builds and code and updates the READM
rabbah commented on issue #326:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-devtools/issues/326#issuecomment-706637417
Check your controller logs - this could mean that the database isn't
reachable or the invokers are offline.
Unless you need a docker compose deployment, I suggest using th
rabbah merged pull request #645:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/645
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
rabbah commented on issue #4994:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4994#issuecomment-706637538
How are you deploying openwhisk?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messag
autthapone commented on issue #4133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4133#issuecomment-706647739
Hi Ritesh, For the attached picture. Where do you find the cute docker
graphics? Please suggest me.
This is an
sciabarracom opened a new pull request #646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/646
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
sourpatchkidz8484 opened a new issue #4995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4995
K
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
style95 merged pull request #4981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4981
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
style95 commented on pull request #4981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4981#issuecomment-706807680
Merged it due to inactivity.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
style95 closed issue #4995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4995
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
style95 commented on issue #4995:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4995#issuecomment-706886374
closing.
@sourpatchkidz8484 If you have any issue to report, please reopen or open a
new issue.
This is an
style95 commented on pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#issuecomment-706886842
It seems there are some issues in the travis job.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service
style95 closed pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
style95 commented on issue #4993:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4993#issuecomment-707097804
This generally looks good to me.
And a couple of ideas came up.
1. If you need a notification for non-blocking activation, why don't you use
just blocking activation?
I
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4989#discussion_r503271492
##
File path:
tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/cli/test/WskWebActionsTests.scala
##
@@ -147,6 +147,25 @@ class WskWebActionsTests extends
style95 merged pull request #4989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4989
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
style95 commented on issue #4133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4133#issuecomment-707099938
@autthapone I suppose that comes "About" in the Docker Desktop?
style95 commented on issue #4992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4992#issuecomment-707101216
I think if that is your first build, it would pull all required dependencies
and build all docker images which takes some time.
Do you observe a similar build time in the subsequ
style95 commented on pull request #4855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4855#issuecomment-707108427
> > I think operators would require two different sets of controllers,
Kafkas, and invokers as this would change the ActivationMessage format.
>
> You mean for a roll ou
style95 commented on a change in pull request #4855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4855#discussion_r503283282
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/ParameterEncryption.scala
##
@@ -26,79 +26,85 @@ import javax.crypto.spec.{G
codecov-io commented on pull request #4983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983#issuecomment-707116829
# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983?src=pr&el=h1)
Report
> Merging
[#4983](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4983?src=pr&el=desc) into
rabbah commented on issue #4985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4985#issuecomment-707176557
Thanks @nitikagarw for the contribution!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to th
rabbah closed issue #4985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/4985
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
rabbah commented on pull request #93:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/93#issuecomment-707177318
I've sent a note to the dev list for comments before proceeding with a merge
in 72 hours.
This is
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request #124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/124
1. add support for Swift 5.3 by replicating Swift 5.1
2. Cleanup vestigial Swift 3 testing artifacts
This is an aut
101 - 200 of 13861 matches
Mail list logo
