Re: [I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-12 Thread via GitHub
sruehl commented on issue #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257#issuecomment-3284176970 Do you want to open a PR for a fix? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the s

Re: [I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-12 Thread via GitHub
sruehl commented on issue #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257#issuecomment-3284087239 So what is the bug exactly? The only thing there is that I see `t.printStackTrace();` as a debug leftover. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to t

[I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-11 Thread via GitHub
JoelGaechter opened a new issue, #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257 ### What happened? Since the update from version 0.12.0 to 0.13.0 I observe an unhandled `ConnectTimeoutException`. The code looks similar to the following and previously logged all exceptions us

Re: [I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-11 Thread via GitHub
JoelGaechter commented on issue #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257#issuecomment-3283792510 I quickly put a breakpoint on `Throwable::printStacktrace` and found that `org.apache.plc4x.java.spi.connection.NettyChannelFactory::createChannel` indeed uses it before wrapping

Re: [I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-11 Thread via GitHub
JoelGaechter commented on issue #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257#issuecomment-3283698081 Modbus TCP, I added the protocol and stacktrace to the issue -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u

Re: [I] [Bug]: Unhandled Netty ConnectTimeoutException

2025-09-11 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2257: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2257#issuecomment-3282861846 So ... what protocol/driver are you using? What's the error being logged? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on t

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-08 Thread via GitHub
shekhartanwar commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3268875769 > Hi, > > yeah ... well you "technically" close it after doing your thing, but it doesn't really close, it but return it to the cache (and potentially waiting threads). In

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Can the s7-200-cn plc support it?

2025-09-07 Thread via GitHub
john1337 commented on issue #731: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/731#issuecomment-3264187605 > Some devices don't support the messages that we use to identify the type of device and simply hang up (logo devices so the same). If you pass in the type of controller, these messages

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-07 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257281430 So I think we added quite a bit of timeout handling in the general core. It might be that some if these are now firing. More than 200DBs every second is quite a lot. The batch

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257585873 Well ... does it generally work, or are you just seeing that in the logs and generally everything is working? In general S7 devices are some times a little "bitchy" ... if they don

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
shekhartanwar commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257771917 > Well ... does it generally work, or are you just seeing that in the logs and generally everything is working? In general S7 devices are some times a little "bitchy" ... if they

[I] [Bug]: S7 protocol leaks memory

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
michele-tramonti opened a new issue, #2248: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2248 ### What happened? i'm using plc4j version 0.13.0, connecting to S7_400. sometimes (I'm not able to identify the specific reason or pattern) i see this error in log: `[2025-09-04 15:51:5

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Can the s7-200-cn plc support it?

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #731: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/731#issuecomment-3262030883 Some devices don't support the messages that we use to identify the type of device and simply hang up (logo devices so the same). If you pass in the type of controller, these messages

Re: [I] [Bug]: S7 protocol leaks memory

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
michele-tramonti commented on issue #2248: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2248#issuecomment-3262459441 Thanks glcj for your reply. My use case is as follows: I have a Spring Boot application running on a Tomcat server, with a service method called every 10 seconds that reads so

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
glcj commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3262096194 Hello, Can you tell me how many bytes (on average) you're reading from each DB, and if it's not a problem, the CPU model with the assigned communications load? I'm in a remote locati

Re: [I] [Bug]: S7 protocol leaks memory

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
glcj commented on issue #2248: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2248#issuecomment-3262132708 Hello, I have 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT running 24/7, with some sporadic disconnection, but never a memory consumption error. Can you tell me your use case so I can replicate the problem? Next

Re: [I] [Bug]: S7 protocol leaks memory

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2248: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2248#issuecomment-3262234571 And if you're not relying on the subscription support, you can try the s7-light driver. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, ple

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Failed to read a V area data from a S7-200 Smart

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #1925: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/1925#issuecomment-3261715825 Where did you get that "transport-protocol=pniop from? That's a setting that has never existed. Sounds like some fallback to profinet. Was this some AI made up connection string?

[I] does plc4j-driver-s7 0.13.0 not support s7-200

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
john1337 opened a new issue, #2247: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2247 ### What would you like to happen? i am using plc4j-driver-s7 0.13.0 to communicate with simens s7-200,but it can't be connected,but when i am using s7connector,everything works well,there's nothing

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Can the s7-200-cn plc support it?

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
john1337 commented on issue #731: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/731#issuecomment-3261690170 > It's hard for us to test and improve, as we Noone I know has one of those devices. i do have this s7-200,device, when i am connecting to s7-200,follow exception came out,can u

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Can the s7-200-cn plc support it?

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #731: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/731#issuecomment-3261673014 It's hard for us to test and improve, as we Noone I know has one of those devices. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Failed to read a V area data from a S7-200 Smart

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
john1337 commented on issue #1925: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/1925#issuecomment-3261664593 > ### What would you like to happen? > Failed to read a V area data from a Simens S7-200 Smart due to the MemoryArea Enum doesn't define one, the address is like VW310 or V350.0. !

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Can the s7-200-cn plc support it?

2025-09-06 Thread via GitHub
john1337 commented on issue #731: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/731#issuecomment-3261658830 > controller-type=S7_200 it doesn't work in my way,same exception thrown as nmgwr described -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messag

[I] [Bug]: S7 Read Request gets timed out after approximately 5-10 minutes

2025-09-05 Thread via GitHub
shekhartanwar opened a new issue, #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246 ### What happened? **Issue** After upgrading to library version 0.13.0, my application, which reads 207 memory blocks from a PLC using the S7 protocol every second, starts throwing timeout ex

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-05 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257949610 Hi, yeah ... well you "technically" close it after doing your thing, but it doesn't really close, it but return it to the cache (and potentially waiting threads). In your c

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-05 Thread via GitHub
shekhartanwar commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257337580 Hi @chrisdutz Yes s7-light is working fine with v0.13.1, but i am seeing below errors in the logs. `2025-09-05T07:16:28.254Z ERROR 1 --- [ntLoopGroup-3-1] o.a.p.j.s.c.Defa

Re: [I] [Bug]: Timeout Exceptions After 5–10 Minutes When Reading 207 Memory Blocks with S7 Protocol in v0.13.0 (Works in v0.12.0)

2025-09-04 Thread via GitHub
sruehl commented on issue #2246: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2246#issuecomment-3257278274 try 0.13.1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
QuanticPony commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3248719509 > I think when the connection is accidentally broken, catching the exception by try catch when trying getConnection again, executing CachedPlcConnectionManager.removeCachedConnecti

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
frankpuppa commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3248658207 Hello, Actually I haven't used the CachedPlcConnectionManager and I did not try to call removeCachedConnection. What I did noticed while using the CachedPlcConnectionManager, is

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3248480270 Let's see if Franks PR will solve this problem? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

Re: [I] [Bug]: modbus read timeout, CachedPlcConnectionManager will not create a new connect

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
yancyang1989-gif commented on issue #2045: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2045#issuecomment-3248457310 > > Indeed this seems to be a common problem with various of our drivers ... gracefully handling disconnects, network problems etc. and allowing a quick recovery. > > Thank

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
yancyang1989-gif commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3248440296 > 你好[@glcj](https://github.com/glcj), 在断开的连接上调用 close 会引发异常。最终必须使用 > > ``` > plcConnection = connectionManager.getConnection(plcConnectionString); > ``` > >

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented?

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
sruehl closed issue #2239: [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented? URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2239 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific c

[I] [Bug]: Fix the broken Docker tests for OPC-UA

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2240: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2240 ### What happened? I have disabled the Docker based OPC-UA tests for now. It seems after updating to Java 21 there were some issues. I have fixed them locally, however it seems Jenkins doesn't pick

[I] [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented?

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
yancyang1989-gif opened a new issue, #2239: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2239 ### What would you like to happen? Where is modbus batch write implemented? ### Programming Languages - [x] plc4j - [ ] plc4go - [ ] plc4c - [ ] plc4net ### Protoc

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented?

2025-09-03 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2239: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2239#issuecomment-3248016618 The problem with that, is that while reading it's OK to read additional bytes that are not needed. However when writing, we would need to fetch the original content first, in order t

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus: Reading Coils as an array returns only the first value

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2060: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2060#issuecomment-3245117470 Öhm ... could you please double-check it' not fixed in the current version? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented?

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
yancyang1989-gif commented on issue #2239: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2239#issuecomment-3247550932 ModbusOptimizer.java Write is not implemented -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus: Reading Coils as an array returns only the first value

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2060: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2060#issuecomment-3245122734 Ah ... forget it ... that was s7, wehre I fixed something similar ... I'll have a look at the PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus: Reading Coils as an array returns only the first value

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
IsmoLeszczynski commented on issue #2060: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2060#issuecomment-3244752586 I made a PR for this, #2192 , any chance to have that reviewed? Admittedly, I bundled two issues in the same PR, if that's a problem I can split the requests. Thanks in advance

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Where is modbus batch write implemented?

2025-09-02 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2239: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2239#issuecomment-3244551611 It's not ;-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

[I] [Bug]: Consumers added to PlcSubscriptionRequest are never after subscription is executed even though PlcSubscriptionEvent happens

2025-09-01 Thread via GitHub
JonasH-munters opened a new issue, #2238: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2238 ### What happened? When creating a PlcSubscriptionRequest and adding a Consumer, either to the whole request or to each Tag, that consumer will never be called even though the OPC UA server cor

Re: [I] [Bug]: Building "with-python" if "update-generated-code" and "enable-all-checks" is active, fails

2025-08-28 Thread via GitHub
ottlukas closed issue #2201: [Bug]: Building "with-python" if "update-generated-code" and "enable-all-checks" is active, fails URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2201 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
frankpuppa commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228721283 > So let me understand your test-case a bit more ... you're connecting to a simulator and polling that in regular intervals. As soon as you turn it off (or in a real device, pull th

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228525482 But admittedly with respect to maintainability, Netty is a nightmare. That's why I'm already working on a completely Netty-free core for PLC4J ... I do hope the funding, that I appli

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228515222 So let me understand your test-case a bit more ... you're connecting to a simulator and polling that in regular intervals. As soon as you turn it off (or in a real device, pull the p

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
frankpuppa commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228379669 Hello @glcj, calling close on a disconnected connection raises an exception. Which eventually must be reopened using the ``` plcConnection = connectionManager.getConnection

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
glcj commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228302632 Hello, If you're going to perform a manual reconnection, you should ensure the connection is closed properly by calling the "close" method. This would allow you to kill the tasks a

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228259901 Admittedly we never meant the "connect" method to be called manually ... if you call it, you might re-initialize a new connection based on an old connection's state. I should investi

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
frankpuppa commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3228245741 Hello Chris, thank you for your reply. Yes I agree, but old connections should eventually be closed and resources should be releases somehow. Nevertheless, the code I p

Re: [I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229#issuecomment-3227996104 Well ... you are actually creating more and more connections with every call to "connect". For cases like yours we strongly reccomend to have a look at our connection-cache: ht

[I] [Bug]: Modbus - Number of threads repetitively increase at each reconnection.

2025-08-27 Thread via GitHub
frankpuppa opened a new issue, #2229: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2229 ### What happened? While I was testing the stability of a modbus application based on plc4x, I faced the problem that on successful reconnection attempts the number of live threads keeps increasing

Re: [I] [Bug]: When reading an array of bits, the old s7 driver seems to hang.

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2215: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2215#issuecomment-3172737528 Fixed that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [I] [Bug]: When reading an array of bits, the old s7 driver seems to hang.

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz closed issue #2215: [Bug]: When reading an array of bits, the old s7 driver seems to hang. URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2215 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [I] [Bug]: The s7 driver causes issues when writing arrays of bits

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz closed issue #2214: [Bug]: The s7 driver causes issues when writing arrays of bits URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2214 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

Re: [I] [Bug]: The block optimizer used in s7-light causes errors, if a tag references the same byte multiple times

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz closed issue #2213: [Bug]: The block optimizer used in s7-light causes errors, if a tag references the same byte multiple times URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2213 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to G

Re: [I] [Bug]: When using the new block-optimizer in the s7-light driver, when reading multiple BOOL values located in the same byte produces errors

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz closed issue #2212: [Bug]: When using the new block-optimizer in the s7-light driver, when reading multiple BOOL values located in the same byte produces errors URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2212 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

Re: [I] [Bug]: The block optimizer used in s7-light causes errors, if a tag references the same byte multiple times

2025-08-10 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz closed issue #2213: [Bug]: The block optimizer used in s7-light causes errors, if a tag references the same byte multiple times URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2213 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to G

[I] [Bug]: When reading an array of bits, the old s7 driver seems to hang.

2025-08-09 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2215: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2215 ### What happened? When reding an array of bits, the old ("s7") driver seems to hang indeffinitely. ### Version v0.13.0 ### Programming Languages - [ ] plc4c - [ ] plc4

[I] [Bug]: The s7 driver causes issues when writing arrays of bits

2025-08-09 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2214: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2214 ### What happened? When writing an array of bits, the request claims to be setting BIT with a length of 5 (in my test-case), but the PLC replies with Return code: Data type inconsistent (0x07)

[I] [Bug]: The block optimizer used in s7-light causes errors, if a tag references the same byte multiple times

2025-08-09 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2213: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2213 ### What happened? If one byte is needed for parsing more than one tag, this causes issues. Usually this should not be an issue, however especially when testing this can be annoying and we should

[I] [Bug]: When using the new block-optimizer in the s7-light driver, when reading multiple BOOL values located in the same byte produces errors

2025-08-09 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2212: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2212 ### What happened? When using the new block-optimizer to read multiple BOOL values, that are located in the same byte in the PLC, the driver doesn't work correctly. ### Version v0.13.0

Re: [I] Modbus arrays aren't supported in NiFi

2025-08-07 Thread via GitHub
QuanticPony commented on issue #337: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x-extras/issues/337#issuecomment-3165114127 With the next release yes, #423 solves array reading. Tested array writing and it works too. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the m

Re: [I] Modbus arrays aren't supported in NiFi

2025-08-07 Thread via GitHub
QuanticPony closed issue #337: Modbus arrays aren't supported in NiFi URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x-extras/issues/337 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [I] Modbus arrays aren't supported in NiFi

2025-08-07 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #337: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x-extras/issues/337#issuecomment-3165103685 Is this issue resolved? I just added something about nifi and arrays to the RELEASE_NOTES. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the messa

[I] [Bug]: Building "with-python" if "update-generated-code" and "enable-all-checks" is active, fails

2025-08-03 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2201: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2201 ### What happened? It seems when running the code-generation steps of the python code-generation-module there are failures. ### Version 0.13.0 ### Programming Languages -

Re: [I] [Bug]: Building with enabled "enable-all-cheks" profiles fails on Arch Mac machines

2025-07-31 Thread via GitHub
sruehl commented on issue #2198: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2198#issuecomment-3138873609 from the looks of it seems that you somehow have a x86 pcap on your system installed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[I] [Bug]: Building with enabled "enable-all-cheks" profiles fails on Arch Mac machines

2025-07-30 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz opened a new issue, #2198: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2198 ### What happened? It seems the tests of the test-generator cause errors when running with enabled "enable-all-checks" profile. ``` [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Tim

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3134934204 I'm not sure, but I could imagine that it should be possible to implement some sort of man-in-the-middle thing, where you start a process and configure it to relay all information to

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3134924066 Hi Thomas, That's great progress! If you could create a pull request from your fork, that simplifies reviewing what you did quite a lot. I think the main problem

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-29 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3133433049 ### Update: My Current State is adding the Code at the AdsProtocolLogic. Especial because I want to use the PlcUsernamePasswordAuthentication for the the PSK Exch

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: ads connection problem

2025-07-28 Thread via GitHub
bluecybermzq commented on issue #2088: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2088#issuecomment-3127240690 Thank you very much for your kind advice! I think if I get a real ADS PLC device to try, then it can be solved. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. T

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: ads connection problem

2025-07-28 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2088: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2088#issuecomment-3127074385 If you use the connect in combination with a username and password for the ADS device, the driver can auto-configure the routes -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: ads connection problem

2025-07-28 Thread via GitHub
bluecybermzq commented on issue #2088: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2088#issuecomment-3126832208 it is still not solved. it is hightly possible the problem caused by wrong twincat route setup. I may try to solve it late. Thanks a lot. -- This is an automated message from t

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: ads connection problem

2025-07-28 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2088: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2088#issuecomment-3126034663 Has this problem been solved? Can it be closed? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[I] [Bug]:Eclipse Milo OPC UA server, Invalid RSA Key

2025-07-26 Thread via GitHub
Nguyen-BangVu opened a new issue, #2196: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2196 ### What happened? I thought that PLC4X was tested using the Milo server, since that's what was written in the documentation. Today I have tried connecting to the Milo server using 4096 c

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Modbus: Support for Word Swap

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
IsmoLeszczynski commented on issue #2059: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2059#issuecomment-3106902846 We had the order for the whole byte sequence (endianness), and we had the order of bytes within a word (byte swap). Word swap is for word pairs, where the two words are switche

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Modbus: Support for Word Swap

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2059: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2059#issuecomment-3106863778 Didn't we already have 4 options for modbus? What's the difference? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: Modbus: Support for Word Swap

2025-07-23 Thread via GitHub
IsmoLeszczynski commented on issue #2059: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2059#issuecomment-3106824216 Time flies, apparently even summer holidays are too busy - I finally created #2192 to handle this and another issue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: ads connection problem

2025-07-17 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername commented on issue #2088: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2088#issuecomment-3086777801 String urlFormat = "ads:tcp://192.168.159.1:851? 851 is the ADS Internal Port. I Think you need 48898 here. https://infosys.beckhoff.com/index.php?content=../co

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3068000786 Another approach, might be not to implement a new transport, but a second driver class, which generally only adds one more layer to the stack. (Or leave it at one, but add a configur

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067991180 Here some links: https://download.beckhoff.com/download/document/automation/twincat3/Secure_ADS_EN.pdf "Secure ADS is an additional transport channel from the point of view of t

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067951828 Generally, I would say you'd be on the right track. However, observing tls secured connection via wireshark will not help unless you can provide the session key. However, I ha

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067430003 Main Reason to add this was that no other Library at the moment has the capabilities to make use of Secure ADS. I think i will first Try to fix that Issue on my own. B

Re: [I] [Feat]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067274403 However, the problem will be implementing it. I will most probably have a look at it, but I have stopped fixing bugs and implementing features for free. Are you willing to don

Re: [I] [Bug]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067268677 Let me try if I can rename it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

Re: [I] [Bug]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067267835 Should i close this Issue and Recreate it as an Feature or will you rename the Issue? For further Information: [German Beckhoff Secure ADS](https://download.beckho

Re: [I] [Bug]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067264994 Can u change it as a Feature Request. For Further Information: -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

Re: [I] [Bug]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173#issuecomment-3067254654 I would rather call this a feature request. Supporting secure communication, definitely needs implementation on the client side. It's definitely nothing that works without changes. D

[I] [Bug]: Secure ADS with Beckhoff ADS PLC

2025-07-13 Thread via GitHub
UserwithnoUsername opened a new issue, #2173: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2173 ### What happened? Setup or own a Beckhoff/BSD SPS Download .iso from Official Beckhoff Website. Setup in Combination with VirtualBox and the following Script. Load a sample Beckhoff Projec

Re: [I] [Feature Request]: How to use plc4x build a cpp project

2025-07-01 Thread via GitHub
capwevan closed issue #1363: [Feature Request]: How to use plc4x build a cpp project URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/1363 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific co

[I] [Bug]: Umati Sample Server BadIdentityTokenInvalid

2025-06-25 Thread via GitHub
Nguyen-BangVu opened a new issue, #2154: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2154 ### What happened? I am currently working on an application using PLC4X. The Umati server is running correctly. Everything should be fine The reason I know this is because everything wo

Re: [I] [Bug]: Issue with connection using 4096-bit certificates

2025-06-07 Thread via GitHub
Nguyen-BangVu commented on issue #2013: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2013#issuecomment-2953014612 Regarding the 4096 client, 4096 server problem. I put a thread into the prosys forum. I quote: "At the moment, Simulation Server supports only using 2048 bit certificates a

Re: [I] [Bug]: Getting error while reading struct type node value and it's attributes

2025-06-07 Thread via GitHub
parthgoel06 commented on issue #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2136#issuecomment-2952747265 Never mind, the issue was in data type WORD, worked using ns=6;s=Arp.Plc.Eclr/THYROBOX_COMPLETE_SYS.R_200;INT -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

Re: [I] [Bug]: Getting error while reading struct type node value and it's attributes

2025-06-07 Thread via GitHub
parthgoel06 closed issue #2136: [Bug]: Getting error while reading struct type node value and it's attributes URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2136 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[I] [Bug]: Getting error while reading struct type node value and it's attributes

2025-06-07 Thread via GitHub
parthgoel06 opened a new issue, #2136: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2136 ### What happened? My OPCUA node ID is like so -> ns=6;s=Arp.Plc.Eclr/THYROBOX_COMPLETE_SYS.R_200 I have created a testing Python script that easily reads this address, but when I use PLC4X

Re: [I] [Bug]: Integration Issues with Rockwell ControlLogix PLC

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2135: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2135#issuecomment-2949500277 Hi "Korni" ;-) Well in general we generate the generated-code from specifications we do in our own format: MSPEC. For the EIP protocol, this is in the file https://github.com/

Re: [I] [Bug]: Integration Issues with Rockwell ControlLogix PLC

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
korni128 commented on issue #2135: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2135#issuecomment-2949195091 Thank you for your prompt response. I believe the most effective approach would be for me to submit a pull request. However, I currently lack direct access to a Rockwell ControlLogix

Re: [I] [Bug]: Integration Issues with Rockwell ControlLogix PLC

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2135: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2135#issuecomment-2949139189 That being said, I think the proposed approach is valid as you and chatgpt mentioned it. If you're willing to implement the fix and prepare a PR, I am willing to assist. If y

Re: [I] [Bug]: Integration Issues with Rockwell ControlLogix PLC

2025-06-06 Thread via GitHub
chrisdutz commented on issue #2135: URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/issues/2135#issuecomment-2949131322 I took the liberty to ask ChatGPT :-) ... here's the response ;-) ... I particularly liked how it positively mentioned PLC4X ;-) -- Yes — thi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >